Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Making Government Work: The Promises and Pitfalls of Performance-Informed Management [Minkštas viršelis]

  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 190 pages, aukštis x plotis x storis: 227x147x11 mm, weight: 295 g, 14 BW Illustrations, 10 BW Photos
  • Serija: Making Government Work
  • Išleidimo metai: 24-Dec-2019
  • Leidėjas: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
  • ISBN-10: 1538125684
  • ISBN-13: 9781538125687
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 190 pages, aukštis x plotis x storis: 227x147x11 mm, weight: 295 g, 14 BW Illustrations, 10 BW Photos
  • Serija: Making Government Work
  • Išleidimo metai: 24-Dec-2019
  • Leidėjas: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
  • ISBN-10: 1538125684
  • ISBN-13: 9781538125687
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
As performance management has evolved, it has encompassed many different tools and approaches including measurement, data analysis, evidence-based management, process improvement, research and evaluation. In the past, many of the efforts to improve performance in government have been fragmented, separated into silos and labeled with a variety of different names including performance-based budgeting, performance-informed management, managing for results and so on.

Making Government Work: The Promises and Pitfalls of Performance-Informed Management by Katherine Barrett and Rich Greene is loaded with dozens of stories of what practitioners are currently working onwhats working and whats not. The benefits are ample, so are the challenges. This book describes both, along with practical steps taken by practitioners to make government work better. Readers will discover that while the authors strive to meet the documentation standards of carefully vetted academic papers, the approach they take is journalistic. Over the last year, Barrett and Greene talked to scores of state and local officials, as well as academics and other national experts to find out how performance management tools and approaches have changed, and what is coming in the near-term future.

Performance management has been in a state of evolution for decades now, and so Barrett and Greene have endeavored to capture the state of the world as it is today. By detailing both the challenges and conquests of performance management in Making Government Work: The Promises and Pitfalls of Performance-Informed Management, Barrett and Greene insure readers will find the kind of balanced information that is helpful to both academics and practitionersand that can move the field forward.
Acknowledgments ix
Preface xiii
About the Authors xvii
Foreword xix
1 Overview
1(2)
2 Challenges
3(6)
Sustainability
5(2)
The Human Element
6(1)
Differing Perspectives
7(2)
3 Benefits
9(14)
Exhibit A: Montgomery County
10(1)
A Catalogue of Benefits San Jose, California
11(9)
Minnesota
12(4)
Wisconsin
16(1)
Indiana
16(1)
Denver, Colorado
17(1)
King County, Washington
18(2)
Case Study a New Orleans: Shock Therapy
20(3)
4 History
23(17)
Progress at the State Level
26(2)
Our Ringside View
28(1)
Federal Advances
29(1)
Box 4.1 Building the Federal Performance Infrastructure
30(1)
Ups and Downs
30(3)
Alternate Approaches
33(3)
Box 4.2 Five Major Changes over the Last Thirty Years
36(1)
Case Study Service Efforts and Accomplishments
37(3)
5 Outcomes
40(17)
Knowing the Goal
43(2)
Box 5.1 The Demise of Oregon Benchmarks
45(1)
Striving for Efficiency
46(1)
Selecting Top-Level Measures
47(3)
Citizen Surveys
50(1)
Connecting to National Measures
51(1)
Case Study Washington: Cross-Agency Collaboration
52(5)
6 Performance Budgeting
57(14)
Performance Budgeting Legislation
58(1)
Impediments
59(3)
Attention to Evidence
62(1)
Budget Execution
63(1)
The Environment Matters
64(2)
Case Study Austin: A Budget with a Vision
66(3)
Case Study Illinois: Unrealistic Expectations
69(2)
7 Pitfalls
71(12)
Insufficient Resources
71(1)
Lack of Data Expertise
72(1)
Weak Internal Training
73(1)
Counterproductive Incentives
73(1)
Slow Response
74(1)
Lack of Sustainability
74(1)
The Practitioner-Academic Disconnect
75(1)
Fear of Adverse Reaction
76(1)
Too Much Hype
76(1)
Flaws with Targets
77(1)
A Limited Focus
78(1)
Neglect of Intractable Problems
78(1)
Legislative Indifference
79(1)
Politics Trumps Management
79(1)
Box 7.1 Rx for Pitfalls
80(3)
8 Buy-In
83(15)
Resisters
84(2)
Accountability versus Performance Improvement
86(1)
Agency Ownership
87(1)
Stat Evolution
88(2)
A Collaborative Approach
90(3)
Case Study Colorado Q&A on Achieving Buy-In
93(5)
9 Validation
98(15)
Consequences of Bad Data
99(1)
Bad Data and Drugs
100(1)
Inconsistent Comparisons
101(2)
Data Fudging and Outright Cheating
103(1)
Verification
104(3)
A Path Forward
107(2)
Box 9.1 The Roots of Inaccuracy
109(1)
Sloppy Data Input
109(1)
Ineffective System Controls
109(1)
Inappropriate System Access
109(1)
Inconsistent Information and Missing Definitions
110(1)
Privatization / Contractor / Third-Party Issues
110(1)
Case Study New York: Changing the Definitions
111(2)
10 Data Progress
113(13)
Service Delivery
114(2)
Open Data
116(1)
Data Sharing
117(1)
Data Governance
118(2)
Box 10.1 The Path Forward
120(1)
The Push for More Helpful Data
121(1)
Box 10.2 Outdated Data
122(2)
Case Study Little Rock: Of Data and Human Beings
124(2)
11 Evaluation
126(12)
Enough Money? Enough Attention?
127(5)
Evaluation on the Frontlines
128(4)
Box 11.1 The Evidence Movement
132(2)
Box 11.2 A Cost-Benefit Approach
134(1)
Case Study Los Angeles: How to Recruit Police?
135(3)
Resources 138(4)
Glossary 142(5)
Notes 147(10)
Index 157
Described by Peter Harkness, founder of Governing magazine, as "by far the most experienced journalists in the country covering public performance," Katherine Barrett and Richard Greene are special project consultants to the Volcker Alliance, senior fellows with the Council of State Governments, senior fellows at the Fels Institute of Government at the University of Pennsylvania, external advisors at the Government Finance Research Center, and fellows in the National Academy of Public Administration. They founded the Government Performance Project, which was funded for more than a decade by The Pew Charitable Trusts and which evaluated performance measurement and other management systems in all 50 states, on a biannual basis, as well as in cities and counties on several occasions. In addition, Richard Greene has been named chair of The Center for Accountability and Performance at the American Society for Public Administration (ASPA). They are also management columnists and write occasional major features for Governing magazine. They are senior fellows at the Governing Institute.