Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

El. knyga: Managing State Fragility: Conflict, Quantification and Power

(Pontifical Catholic University (PUC), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil)

DRM apribojimai

  • Kopijuoti:

    neleidžiama

  • Spausdinti:

    neleidžiama

  • El. knygos naudojimas:

    Skaitmeninių teisių valdymas (DRM)
    Leidykla pateikė šią knygą šifruota forma, o tai reiškia, kad norint ją atrakinti ir perskaityti reikia įdiegti nemokamą programinę įrangą. Norint skaityti šią el. knygą, turite susikurti Adobe ID . Daugiau informacijos  čia. El. knygą galima atsisiųsti į 6 įrenginius (vienas vartotojas su tuo pačiu Adobe ID).

    Reikalinga programinė įranga
    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą mobiliajame įrenginyje (telefone ar planšetiniame kompiuteryje), turite įdiegti šią nemokamą programėlę: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą asmeniniame arba „Mac“ kompiuteryje, Jums reikalinga  Adobe Digital Editions “ (tai nemokama programa, specialiai sukurta el. knygoms. Tai nėra tas pats, kas „Adobe Reader“, kurią tikriausiai jau turite savo kompiuteryje.)

    Negalite skaityti šios el. knygos naudodami „Amazon Kindle“.

This book looks at the management of ‘state fragility’ and the practices and impacts of quantification over relations of power in international politics.

It argues that practices of quantification and classification of ‘fragile states’ are not a mere technicality. They emerge from the deep-seated uses of statistical reasoning; moreover, their political entrenchment in policy-making has impacts that can be extrapolated to the development-security debate more generally. The book suggests that quantifying and classifying practices constitute a style of thinking and doing political management of ‘fragile states’, which carries symbolic power. Through the subtlety and reasonableness of practical sense, symbolic power wins the complicity of those who seem least favored by it – as exemplified by the g7+ group of self-labelled and self-measured ‘fragile states’. The book broadly suggests that by looking at quantification as a technical and political practice, we can effectively engage with newly established types of transnational power and better understand how numbers can enable powerful practices of marginalization.

In that sense, the book analyzes important direct and indirect practices of ranking and categorization that help make of ‘state fragility’ what the book calls a measurable and manageable political truth. It looks at the relations between the World Bank, OECD and the g7+ to understand how this political truth is constructed, what power is mobilized in this construction and how these insights can help make sense of a now much quantified form of making policy. As such, the book aims at understanding how the variable ‘conflict’ influences the way development is currently practiced, reinforcing and modifying an already existent quantifying reasoning; and how this quantifying reasoning towards ‘fragile states’ opens space for certain appropriation of practices of power in a way that was or is not possible in relations of power centered in more direct forms of control.

This book will be of much interest to students of critical security studies, International Political Sociology, development studies, and IR in general.  

List of figures
vi
List of tables
vii
Preface viii
Acknowledgements ix
List of abbreviations
xi
Introduction: aid engineering -- the correlates of fragility 1(27)
1 The power in being practical
28(29)
2 A historical sociology of the fragile states label
57(28)
3 How quantification ranks fragility, development-and-conflict
85(31)
4 `Good enough' politics
116(25)
5 Efficiency traps
141(27)
6 Symbolic power: the costs of engagement and disengagement
168(32)
Conclusions: a case for subtlety 200(15)
Index 215
Isabel Rocha de Siqueira is Lecturer at the Institute of International Relations, Pontifķcia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Brazil, and holds a PhD in International Relations from Kings College London, UK.