Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

El. knyga: Mapping Paths to Family Justice: Resolving Family Disputes in Neoliberal Times

  • Formatas: PDF+DRM
  • Serija: Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies
  • Išleidimo metai: 07-Mar-2017
  • Leidėjas: Palgrave Macmillan
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781137554055
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: PDF+DRM
  • Serija: Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies
  • Išleidimo metai: 07-Mar-2017
  • Leidėjas: Palgrave Macmillan
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781137554055
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:

DRM apribojimai

  • Kopijuoti:

    neleidžiama

  • Spausdinti:

    neleidžiama

  • El. knygos naudojimas:

    Skaitmeninių teisių valdymas (DRM)
    Leidykla pateikė šią knygą šifruota forma, o tai reiškia, kad norint ją atrakinti ir perskaityti reikia įdiegti nemokamą programinę įrangą. Norint skaityti šią el. knygą, turite susikurti Adobe ID . Daugiau informacijos  čia. El. knygą galima atsisiųsti į 6 įrenginius (vienas vartotojas su tuo pačiu Adobe ID).

    Reikalinga programinė įranga
    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą mobiliajame įrenginyje (telefone ar planšetiniame kompiuteryje), turite įdiegti šią nemokamą programėlę: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą asmeniniame arba „Mac“ kompiuteryje, Jums reikalinga  Adobe Digital Editions “ (tai nemokama programa, specialiai sukurta el. knygoms. Tai nėra tas pats, kas „Adobe Reader“, kurią tikriausiai jau turite savo kompiuteryje.)

    Negalite skaityti šios el. knygos naudodami „Amazon Kindle“.

The family justice system in England and Wales has undergone radical change over the past 20 years. A significant part of this shifting landscape has been an increasing emphasis on settling private family disputes out of court, which has been embraced by policy-makers, judges and practitioners alike and is promoted as an unqualified good.

Mapping Paths to Family Justice: Resolving Family Disputes in Neoliberal Times examines the experiences of people taking part in out-of-court family dispute resolution in England and Wales. It addresses questions such as how participants experiences match up to the ideal; how recent changes to the legal system have affected peoples ability to access out-of-court dispute resolution; and what kind of outcomes are achieved in family dispute resolution.







This book is the first study systematically to compare different forms of family dispute resolution. It explores peoples experiences of solicitor negotiations, mediation and collaborative law empirically by analyzing findings from a nationally representative survey, individual in-depth interviews with parties and practitioners, and recorded family dispute resolution processes. It considers these in the context of ongoing neoliberal reforms to the family justice system, drawing out conclusions and implications for policy and practice.
List of Figures
ix
List of Tables
x
Authors' Note xi
Acknowledgements xii
List of Abbreviations
xiv
1 Introduction
1(19)
Key concepts
2(8)
Neoliberalism
2(1)
Family dispute resolution
3(3)
(Family) justice
6(4)
The neoliberal transformation of the family justice system
10(7)
Chapter outline
17(3)
2 The Three FDRs
20(33)
Family solicitors
20(6)
Qualifications, training, regulation and professional bodies
21(1)
Research and policy on family solicitors
22(4)
Mediation
26(20)
Styles of mediation
26(2)
The mediation process
28(1)
Qualifications, training, regulation and professional bodies
29(5)
Family mediation in practice
34(1)
Research on family mediation
34(12)
Collaborative law
46(5)
Qualifications, training, regulation and professional bodies
46(1)
The collaborative process
47(2)
Collaborative law in practice
49(1)
Research on collaborative law
50(1)
Conclusion
51(2)
3 The Research Project
53(14)
Introduction
53(1)
Aims of the study
54(5)
Creating an evidence base
54(1)
Exploring normative issues
55(2)
Research questions
57(1)
Subsequent policy developments
58(1)
Research design and methods
59(8)
Phase 1 The Quantitative national survey
60(1)
Phase 2 Qualitative Party and practitioner interviews
61(3)
Phase 3 Recorded Sessions
64(1)
Analysis and synthesis
65(2)
4 Awareness of FDRs: The Policy Challenge
67(17)
Research findings on awareness
69(9)
Survey findings
70(4)
Interview findings
74(4)
The trials and tribulations of family mediation after LASPO
78(4)
Conclusion
82(2)
5 Entering Family Dispute Resolution
84(27)
Introduction
84(1)
Choosing an FDR process
85(11)
Exercising autonomy -- positive choice
86(2)
Limited autonomy -- constrained choice
88(6)
Mitigating constraint -- the importance of informed choice
94(2)
Screening for domestic violence
96(11)
The screening process
98(3)
Responding to disclosures of violence
101(3)
Party perspectives on MIAMs and mediation after experiencing domestic violence
104(3)
Conclusion
107(4)
6 Experiences of FDRs
111(42)
Introduction
111(1)
The experience of solicitor negotiation
112(10)
What parties liked about the solicitor negotiation process
113(1)
What parties did not like about the solicitor negotiation process
114(1)
Emotion and conflict in the solicitor negotiation process
115(2)
Experiences of solicitor negotiation in domestic abuse cases
117(1)
Gendered experiences of the solicitor negotiation process
118(1)
The role of the practitioner in solicitor negotiation
119(1)
Focus on children's welfare in solicitor negotiation
120(2)
Experience of the process of mediation
122(16)
What parties liked about the mediation process
122(2)
What parties did not like about the mediation process
124(2)
Gendered experiences of mediation
126(1)
Emotions and conflict in the mediation process
126(3)
Experiences of co-mediation
129(2)
Experiences of shuttle mediation
131(1)
The role of the practitioner in mediation
132(3)
Focus on children's welfare in the mediation process
135(3)
Experiences of the process of collaborative law
138(9)
What parties liked about the collaborative law process
138(2)
What parties did not like about the collaborate law process
140(1)
Experiences of the disqualification clause
141(1)
Gendered experiences of the collaborative law process
142(1)
Emotions and conflict in collaborative law
143(1)
Experiences of collaborative law in domestic abuse cases
144(1)
The role of the practitioner in the collaborative law process
145(1)
The collaborative process and children's welfare
146(1)
Participants' comparisons of FDR processes
147(2)
Conclusions
149(4)
7 Outcomes of FDRs
153(21)
Introduction
153(1)
Resolution rates
154(2)
Satisfaction with outcomes
156(3)
Partial outcomes
157(1)
The non-binding nature of mediated agreements
158(1)
Reasons for settlement
159(6)
Mediation
160(1)
Solicitor negotiations
161(1)
Collaborative law
162(1)
Gendered reasons for settlement
162(3)
Longer-term outcomes -- improving communication and reducing conflict
165(3)
Improving communication
165(2)
Reducing conflict
167(1)
Cases that were not resolved by FDRs
168(3)
Conclusion
171(3)
8 `Just' Settlements?
174(31)
Introduction
174(1)
Parties' norms
175(20)
Practitioners' norms
180(1)
Child welfare norms
181(3)
The shadow of the law
184(11)
The encounter between party and practitioner norms
195(1)
The norms embodied in outcomes
195(3)
The relationship between norms and resolution
198(2)
Just settlement?
200(2)
Conclusion
202(3)
9 Conclusion
205(7)
Appendix 1 Summary of Project Information Available on UK Data Service 212(2)
Appendix 2 Summary of TNS-BMRB Omnibus Survey Methodology 214(3)
References 217(12)
Index 229
Anne Barlow FAcSS is a Professor of Family Law and Policy at the University of Exeter. She has published widely in the field of family law and has a particular research interest in the regulation of adult relationships and in the family justice system.  She has directed a number of socio-legal research projects on family and property issues including on cohabitation law reform and pre-nuptial agreements, funded by the Nuffield Foundation.  Most recently, she led the ESRC-funded Mapping Paths to Family Justice project on which this book is based, which explored norms and experiences within alternative family dispute resolution.

Rosemary Hunter FAcSS is Professor of Law and Socio-Legal Studies at Queen Mary University of London. She was previously Professor of Law at the University of Kent, and Professor and Dean of Law at Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia, and has chaired the Research Committee on Sociology of Laws Working Group on Gender and Law (2003-10) and the UK Socio-Legal Studies Association (2011-17). Her socio-legal work includes studies of family court processes and out-of-court family dispute resolution, the experiences in court of litigants in person and victims of domestic violence, legal aid and access to justice, the implementation of feminist law reforms, women in the legal profession and the judiciary, and feminist judging.

Janet Smithson is a social psychologist, and a senior lecturer in the School of Psychology at the University of Exeter. She has worked on a variety of national and European funded research projects, Her research interests include gender and discourse, work-life practices and policies, life course transitions, interactions in therapy and mediation, and internet-mediated communication.

Jan Ewing is the Shackleton Research Fellow and Creating Paths to Family Justice Research Fellow in the Law School, University of Exeter. Jan was a Research Associate on the preceding Mapping Paths to Family Justice project. She was a family law solicitor, including at partnership level, in a career spanning 20 years. She lectures in Family Law on the Legal Practice Course at BPP University. Her PhD at the University of Cambridge was a longitudinal study of 52 couples over the first four years of marriage to examine what drives thriving marriages and what erodes marital satisfaction in this period.