EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
|
1 | (26) |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
Use of HIV Data in the Title I and II Allocation Formulas, |
|
|
3 | (11) |
|
Estimating Resource Needs, |
|
|
14 | (3) |
|
Measuring Quality of Care, |
|
|
17 | (5) |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
|
23 | (4) |
1 INTRODUCTION |
|
27 | (14) |
|
|
28 | (2) |
|
|
30 | (4) |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
|
34 | (4) |
|
Organization of the Report, |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
|
38 | (3) |
2 OVERVIEW OF THE HIV/AIDS EPIDEMIC AND THE RYAN WHITE CARE ACT |
|
41 | (32) |
|
Overview of the HIV/AIDS Epidemic, |
|
|
41 | (3) |
|
Paying for HIV/AIDS Care, |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
|
45 | (7) |
|
Current Structure of the Act, |
|
|
52 | (9) |
|
Overview of CARE Act Allocation Formulas, |
|
|
61 | (8) |
|
|
69 | (4) |
3 PUBLIC HEALTH AND HIV/AIDS SURVEILLANCE |
|
73 | (14) |
|
Public Health Surveillance, |
|
|
73 | (3) |
|
AIDS and HIV Case Reporting, |
|
|
76 | (4) |
|
Other Methods for Estimating HIV Prevalence, |
|
|
80 | (4) |
|
|
84 | (3) |
4 HIV REPORTING DATA AND TITLE I AND II FORMULAS |
|
87 | (48) |
|
Capability of State HIV Reporting Systems to Provide Data for the Formulas, |
|
|
90 | (4) |
|
Comparability of Data Quality Across Jurisdictions, |
|
|
94 | (24) |
|
Relative Disease Burden and Ranking of Need Across Jurisdictions, |
|
|
118 | (3) |
|
Sensitivity of the Formula Allocations to Changes in the Underlying Input Data, |
|
|
121 | (4) |
|
Methods for Improving Data for the Formulas, |
|
|
125 | (3) |
|
|
128 | (2) |
|
|
130 | (5) |
5 ESTIMATING RESOURCE NEEDS |
|
135 | (53) |
|
Factors Affecting Resource Needs, |
|
|
137 | (3) |
|
Title I Supplemental Award Process, |
|
|
140 | (4) |
|
Criteria for Assessing Measures of Resource Needs, |
|
|
144 | (2) |
|
Analysis of Title I Supplemental Applications, |
|
|
146 | (22) |
|
|
168 | (3) |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
|
172 | (12) |
|
|
184 | (2) |
|
|
186 | (2) |
6 MEASURING QUALITY OF CARE |
|
188 | (33) |
|
Current HRSA/HAB Quality of Care Activities, |
|
|
190 | (4) |
|
Four-Dimensional Conceptual Framework for HIV Quality Assessment, |
|
|
194 | (6) |
|
Principles for Selecting Quality-of-Care Measures, |
|
|
200 | (2) |
|
Existing Quality-of-Care Measures for HIV/AIDS, |
|
|
202 | (11) |
|
|
213 | (2) |
|
|
215 | (2) |
|
|
217 | (4) |
7 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS |
|
221 | (16) |
|
|
233 | (4) |
APPENDIXES |
|
|
|
237 | (2) |
|
B Financial Resources of States for HIV/AIDS Reporting |
|
|
239 | (8) |
|
C Analyses of the Sensitivity of the Formula Allocations to Underlying Changes in Input Data |
|
|
247 | (14) |
|
D Methodological Details of HCSUS Analyses |
|
|
261 | (6) |
|
E Tables of HIV/AIDS Quality Measures from Selected Sources |
|
|
267 | (28) |
|
|
295 | |