Preface |
|
xiii | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xxi | |
About the Authors |
|
xxv | |
Common Abbreviations |
|
xxix | |
1 Introduction |
|
1 | (14) |
|
1.1 Introduction of Biomaterials |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
1.1.1 What Is a Biomaterial? |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
1.1.2 What Is Biocompatibility? |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
1.2 Types of Biomaterials |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
1.2.1 Incompatible and Biocompatible Materials |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
1.2.2 Nearly Bioinert Materials |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
1.2.3 Bioactive Materials |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
1.3 Categories of Bioceramics |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
1.4 What Is Hydroxyapatite? |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
1.5 What Is Hydroxyapatite Coating? |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
1.6 Introduction of Bone: A Natural Biomaterial |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
1.7 Introduction of Teeth: A Natural Biomaterial |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
1.8 Surface Engineering of Bioinert Materials |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
1.9 Challenges to Develop Surface-Engineered Implants |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (2) |
2 Plasma Spraying and Other Related Coating Techniques |
|
15 | (28) |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
2.2 How Will Coating Form? |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
2.3 Plasma Sprayed HAp Coatings |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
2.5 Microplasma Spraying and Its Application |
|
|
19 | (3) |
|
2.6 Microplasma Spraying: A Unique Manufacturing Technique |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
2.7 Other Coating Processes |
|
|
24 | (11) |
|
2.7.1 High Velocity Oxy Fuel |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
2.7.2 Pulsed Laser Deposition |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
2.7.4 Liquid Precursor Plasma Spraying |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
2.7.5 Electrophoretic Deposition |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
2.7.6 Electrohydrodynamic Atomization |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
31 | (2) |
|
2.7.8 Sol-Gel and Dip Coating |
|
|
33 | (2) |
|
2.7.9 Biomimetic Coating Process |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
2.8 Microplasma vs. Macroplasma Spraying |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
|
37 | (6) |
3 Hydroxyapatite Coating and Its Application |
|
43 | (16) |
|
3.1 Background of the Problem and Basic Issues |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
3.2 Applications of HAp Coating |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
3.3 HAp Coating Developed by Different Methods |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
3.3.1 Issues Related to High Temperature Processes |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
3.3.2 Issues Related to Low-Temperature Processes |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
3.3.3 Issues Related to MIPS Processes |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
3.4 Microplasma and Macroplasma Sprayed HAp Coatings: Pros and Cons |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
3.5 Influence of Plasma Spraying Parameters on HAp Coating |
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
3.5.1 Role of Plasma Spraying Atmosphere, Spraying Current, and Stand-Off Distance |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
3.5.2 Role of Gun Traverse Speed |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
3.5.3 Role of Specimen Holder Arrangements |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
3.5.4 Macroplasma Spraying vs. Microplasma Spraying |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
3.6 Nanostructured HAp Coating |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
3.7 HAp Composite Coating |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
3.8 Plasma-Sprayed HAp Coating: Current Research Scenario |
|
|
50 | (2) |
|
3.8.1 Robot-Assisted Plasma Spraying |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
3.8.2 Vacuum Plasma Spraying |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
3.8.3 Liquid Precursor Plasma Spraying |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
3.8.5 Microplasma Spraying |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (6) |
4 Structural and Chemical Properties of Hydroxyapatite Coating |
|
59 | (32) |
|
|
59 | (4) |
|
4.1.1 Thickness of HAp Coatings |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
4.1.2 Porosity of HAp Coatings |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
4.1.3 Crystallinity of HAp Coatings |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
4.3 Phase Analysis of MIPS-HAp Coatings |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
4.4 Spectroscopic Investigation of MIPS-HAp Coatings |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
4.5 Microstructure of MIPS-HAp Coating |
|
|
66 | (10) |
|
4.5.1 As-Sprayed Condition |
|
|
66 | (3) |
|
4.5.2 Microstructure of MIPS-HAp Coatings in the Polished Condition |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
4.5.3 Splat Geometry and Dimension |
|
|
69 | (2) |
|
4.5.4 Analysis of Splat Formation |
|
|
71 | (2) |
|
4.5.5 Why Are Micropores Formed? |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
4.5.6 How Are Macropores Formed? |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
4.5.7 Coating Cross Section |
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
4.6 Porosity Dependencies of Young's Modulus and Hardness |
|
|
76 | (2) |
|
4.7 Qualitative Model for Explanation of Anisotropy |
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
4.8 Origin of Modeling on Pore Shape |
|
|
80 | (4) |
|
4.8.1 Modeling of Elastic Constants |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
4.8.2 Physical Background of Modeling |
|
|
81 | (2) |
|
4.8.3 Experimental Validation of the Void Models: Superimposition of Spherical and Elliptical Voids |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (6) |
5 In Vitro Studies of Hydroxyapatite Coatings |
|
91 | (18) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
5.3 Synthesis of SBF in the Laboratory |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
5.4 SBF Immersion of MAPS-HAp Coatings on SS316L |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
5.5 SBF Immersion of MIPS-HAp Coatings on SS316L |
|
|
95 | (11) |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
|
106 | (3) |
6 Macromechanical Properties of Hydroxyapatite Coating |
|
109 | (24) |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
6.2 What Governs HAp Coating's Performance? |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
6.4 Bonding Strength and Methods of Measurements |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
6.5 What Are General Guidelines to Improve Bonding Strength? |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
6.6 Other Important Parameters |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
6.7 Influence of Adhesive |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
6.8 Influence of Microstructure |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
6.9 Influence of Vacuum Heat Treatment |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
6.10 Role of Interfacial Stress |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
6.11 Role of Substrate Holding Arrangements |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
6.12 Failure Mode and Related Issues |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
6.13 Influence of Humidity |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
6.14 Influence of the Dissolution Behavior |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
6.15 Bonding Strength Measurements by Techniques Other than ASTM C-633 |
|
|
117 | (2) |
|
6.16 HAp Coatings Developed by Other Coating Processes |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
6.17 Bonding Strength of MIPS-HAp Coatings |
|
|
119 | (2) |
|
6.18 MAPS-HAp vs. MIPS-HAp Coatings |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
6.19 Effect of Residual Stress |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
6.20 Shear Strength and Pushout Strength |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
6.21 Three-Point Bending Test |
|
|
124 | (3) |
|
|
127 | (2) |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
|
129 | (4) |
7 Micro/Nanomechanical Properties of Hydroxyapatite Coating |
|
133 | (28) |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
7.2 Basic Theory of Nanoindentation |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
|
135 | (4) |
|
7.3.1 What Does the Literature Say about Hardness? |
|
|
136 | (2) |
|
7.3.2 Nanohardness of MIPS-HAp Coatings |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
|
139 | (5) |
|
7.4.1 What Does the Literature Say about Young's Modulus? |
|
|
139 | (5) |
|
7.4.2 Young's Modulus of MIPS-HAp Coatings |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
7.5 Effect of SBF Immersion |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
7.5.1 Effect of SBF Immersion for MIPS-HAp Coatings |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
7.6 Reliability Issues in Nanoindentation Data |
|
|
145 | (7) |
|
7.6.1 Weibull Distribution Function |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
7.6.2 Weibull Modulus of Nanohardness and Young's Modulus of MIPS-HAp Coating |
|
|
147 | (2) |
|
7.6.3 ISE in MIPS-HAp Coating |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
7.6.4 Anisotropy in MIPS-HAp Coating |
|
|
150 | (2) |
|
7.7 Fracture Toughness of MIPS-HAp Coatings |
|
|
152 | (5) |
|
7.7.1 Why Is Fracture Toughness Important and How Is It Measured? |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
7.7.2 Site-Specific Nanoindentation |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
7.7.3 What Does the Literature Say? |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
7.7.4 Why Do MIPS-HAp Coatings Show High Toughness? |
|
|
155 | (2) |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
|
158 | (3) |
8 Tribological Properties of Hydroxyapatite Coatings |
|
161 | (20) |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
8.2 What Does the Literature Say? |
|
|
161 | (4) |
|
8.3 Nanoscratch Testing of MIPS-HAp Coatings at Lower Load |
|
|
165 | (2) |
|
8.4 Nanoscratch Testing of MIPS-HAp Coating at Higher Load |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
8.5 Microscratch Testing of MIPS-HAp Coatings |
|
|
167 | (7) |
|
8.5.1 As-Sprayed MIPS-HAp Coating |
|
|
169 | (3) |
|
8.5.2 Polished MIPS-HAp Coating |
|
|
172 | (2) |
|
8.6 Microscratch Testing of MIPS-HAp Coatings before and after the SBF Immersion |
|
|
174 | (2) |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
|
177 | (4) |
9 Residual Stress of Hydroxyapatite Coating |
|
181 | (22) |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
9.2 Origin of Residual Stress |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
9.3 Identification of Residual Stress and Importance |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
9.4 Factors Affecting Residual Stress |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
9.5 Common Methodologies to Evaluate Residual Stress |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
9.6 Relative Advantages and Disadvantages |
|
|
184 | (8) |
|
|
186 | (3) |
|
9.6.2 Hole Drilling Method |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
9.6.3 Raman Piezospectroscopy-Based Method |
|
|
190 | (1) |
|
|
190 | (1) |
|
|
190 | (2) |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
9.7 Role of Higher Plasmatron Power and Secondary Gas |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
9.8 Role of the Substrate Temperature |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
9.9 Nature of the Residual Stress State |
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
9.10 Role of Other Basic Process Parameters |
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
9.11 Residual Stress of Thermally-Sprayed and Sol-Gel-Derived HAp Coatings |
|
|
194 | (2) |
|
9.12 Residual Stress of MIPS-HAp Coatings |
|
|
196 | (2) |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
|
199 | (4) |
10 In Vivo Studies of Microplasma Sprayed Hydroxyapatite Coating |
|
203 | (16) |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
|
203 | (9) |
|
10.2.1 Intramedullary Pinning |
|
|
203 | (3) |
|
10.2.2 Visual Observation |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
10.2.3 Studies of Serum Calcium, Inorganic Phosphorus, and Alkaline Phosphatase |
|
|
207 | (2) |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
10.2.3.2 Inorganic Phosphorus |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
10.2.3.3 Alkaline Phosphatase |
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
10.2.4 Radiographic Evaluation |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
10.2.5 Histological Observations |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
10.2.6 Fluorochrome Labeling Study |
|
|
210 | (2) |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
10.3.1 Visual Observation |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
10.3.2 Mechanical Behavior |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
|
213 | (2) |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
|
215 | (4) |
11 Future Scope and Possibilities |
|
219 | (10) |
|
11.1 MIPS-HAp Coating on Complex and Contoured Implants |
|
|
219 | (2) |
|
11.2 MIPS Coating of Other Calcium Phosphates (TCP, BCP, etc.) |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
11.3 MIPS-HAp Coatings on C/C Composites |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
11.4 Second Phase Incorporation in HAp Coatings |
|
|
223 | (1) |
|
11.5 Nanostructured Plasma Sprayed HAp Coating |
|
|
224 | (2) |
|
|
226 | (3) |
12 Conclusions |
|
229 | (6) |
Index |
|
235 | |