|
1 Meta-analysis in a Nutshell |
|
|
1 | (22) |
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
1.3 How to Perform a Meta-analysis? |
|
|
5 | (3) |
|
1.4 Scientific Rigor, Rule 1 |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
1.5 Scientific Rigor, Rule 2 |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
1.6 Scientific Rigor, Rule 3 |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
1.7 Scientific Rigor, Rule 4 |
|
|
12 | (3) |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
|
16 | (3) |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
1.11 Benefits and Criticisms of Meta-analyses |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
|
21 | (2) |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
|
23 | (20) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
2.3 Continuous Outcome Data, Mean and Standard Deviation |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
2.3.1 Means and Standard Deviation (SD) |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
2.4 Continuous Outcome Data, Strictly Standardized Mean Difference (SSMD) |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
2.5 Continuous Outcome Data, Regression Coefficient and Standard Error |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
2.6 Continuous Outcome Data, Student's T-Value |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
2.7 Continuous Outcome Data, Correlation Coefficient (R or r) and Its Standard Error |
|
|
29 | (2) |
|
2.8 Continuous Outcome Data, Coefficient of Determination R2 or r2 and Its Standard Error |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
2.9 Binary Outcome Data, Risk Difference |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
2.10 Binary Outcome Data, Relative Risk |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
2.11 Binary Outcome Data, Odds Ratio |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
2.12 Binary Outcome Data, Survival Data |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
2.13 Pitfalls, Publication Bias |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
2.14 Pitfalls, Heterogeneity |
|
|
35 | (3) |
|
2.15 Pitfalls, Lack of Sensitivity |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
40 | (3) |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
3 Meta-analysis and the Scientific Method |
|
|
43 | (8) |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
3.2 Example 1, the Potassium Meta-analysis of the Chap. 6 |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
3.3 Example 2, the Calcium Channel Blocker Meta-analysis of the Chap. 6 |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
3.4 Example 3, the Large Randomized Trials Meta-analyses of the Chap. 6 |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
3.5 Example 4, the Diabetes and Heart Failure Meta-analysis of the Chap. 7 |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
3.6 Example 5, the Adverse Drug Effect Admissions and the Type of Research Group Meta-analysis of the Chap. 8 |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
3.7 Example 6, the Coronary Events and Collaterals Meta-analysis of the Chap. 8 |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
3.8 Example 7, the Diagnostic Meta-analysis of Metastatic Lymph Node Imaging of the Chap. 10 |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
3.9 Example 8, the Homocysteine and Cardiac Risk Meta-analysis of the Chap. 11 |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
|
48 | (3) |
|
|
49 | (2) |
|
4 Meta-analysis and Random Effect Analysis |
|
|
51 | (12) |
|
|
51 | (2) |
|
4.2 Visualizing Heterogeneity |
|
|
53 | (2) |
|
4.3 Binary Outcome Data, Fixed Effect Analysis |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
4.4 Binary Outcome Data, Random Effect Analysis |
|
|
56 | (2) |
|
4.5 Continuous Outcome Data, Fixed Effect Analysis |
|
|
58 | (2) |
|
4.6 Continuous Outcome Data, Random Effect Analysis |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
|
61 | (2) |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
5 Meta-analysis with Statistical Software |
|
|
63 | (16) |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
5.2 Using Online Meta-analysis Calculators and MetaXL Free Meta-analysis Software |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
5.3 Continuous Outcome Data, Online Meta-analysis Calculator |
|
|
64 | (3) |
|
5.4 Binary Outcome Data, MetaXL Free Meta-analysis Software |
|
|
67 | (8) |
|
5.4.1 Traditional Random Effect Analysis |
|
|
68 | (4) |
|
5.4.2 Quasi Likelihood (Invert Variance Heterogeneity (IVhet)) Modeling for Heterogeneity |
|
|
72 | (3) |
|
|
75 | (4) |
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
6 Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials |
|
|
79 | (14) |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
6.2 Example 1: Single Outcomes |
|
|
81 | (4) |
|
6.3 Example 1, Confirming the Scientific Question |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
6.4 Example 2: Multiple Outcomes |
|
|
85 | (2) |
|
6.5 Example 2, Handling Multiple Outcomes |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
6.6 Example 3, Large Meta-analyses Without Need for Pitfall Assessment |
|
|
88 | (2) |
|
|
90 | (3) |
|
|
91 | (2) |
|
7 Meta-analysis of Observational Plus Randomized Studies |
|
|
93 | (8) |
|
7.1 Introduction and Example |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
7.2 Sound Clinical Arguments and Scientific Question |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
|
96 | (2) |
|
7.5 Heterogeneity Assessments |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
7.6 Publication Bias Assessments |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
7.7 Robustness Assessments |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
7.8 Improved Information from the Combined Meta-analysis |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
8 Meta-analysis of Observational Studies |
|
|
101 | (14) |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
8.2 Prospective Open Evaluation Studies |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
8.3 Example 1, Event Analysis in Patients with Collateral Coronary Arteries |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
8.4 Example 1, the Scientific Method |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
8.5 Example 1, Publication Bias |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
8.6 Example 1, Pooled Results, Tests for Heterogeneity and Robustness |
|
|
104 | (2) |
|
8.7 Example 1, Meta-regression Analysis |
|
|
106 | (2) |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
8.9 Example 2, Event Analysis of Iatrogenic Hospital Admissions |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
8.10 Example 2, the Scientific Method |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
8.11 Example 2, Publication Bias |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
8.12 Example 2, Overall Results and Heterogeneity and Lack of Robustness |
|
|
110 | (2) |
|
8.13 Example 2, Meta-regression |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
8.14 Example 2, Conclusions |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
|
113 | (2) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
|
115 | (12) |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
9.2 Example 1, Continuous Outcome |
|
|
115 | (6) |
|
9.2.1 Exploratory Purpose |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
|
117 | (2) |
|
|
119 | (2) |
|
9.3 Example 2, Binary Outcome |
|
|
121 | (3) |
|
9.3.1 Exploratory Purpose |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
|
124 | (3) |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
10 Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Studies |
|
|
127 | (8) |
|
|
127 | (2) |
|
10.2 Diagnostic Odds Ratios (DORs) |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
|
129 | (3) |
|
10.4 Constructing Summary ROC Curves |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
|
133 | (2) |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
|
135 | (10) |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
11.2 Example 1, Meta-Meta-analysis for Re-assessment of the Pitfalls of the Original Meta-analyses |
|
|
136 | (5) |
|
11.3 Example 2, Meta-Meta-analysis for Meta-learning Purposes |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
|
142 | (3) |
|
|
143 | (2) |
|
|
145 | (12) |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
12.2 Example 1, Lazarou-1 (JAMA 1998; 279: 1200-5) |
|
|
146 | (2) |
|
12.3 Example 2, Atiqi (Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2009; 47: 549-56) |
|
|
148 | (3) |
|
12.4 Example 3, Lazarou-1 and Atiqi (JAMA 1998; 279: 1200-5, and Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2009; 47: 549-56) |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
12.5 Example 4, Lazarou-1 and -2 (JAMA 1998; 279: 1200-5) |
|
|
152 | (3) |
|
|
155 | (2) |
|
|
155 | (2) |
|
13 Random Intercepts Meta-analysis |
|
|
157 | (10) |
|
|
157 | (2) |
|
13.2 Example, Meta-analysis of Three Studies |
|
|
159 | (6) |
|
|
165 | (2) |
|
|
165 | (2) |
|
14 Probit Meta-regression |
|
|
167 | (10) |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
|
167 | (8) |
|
|
175 | (2) |
|
|
175 | (2) |
|
15 Meta-analysis with General Loglinear Models |
|
|
177 | (8) |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
15.2 Example, Weighted Multiple Linear Regression |
|
|
177 | (3) |
|
15.3 Example, General Loglinear Modeling |
|
|
180 | (3) |
|
|
183 | (2) |
|
|
183 | (2) |
|
16 Meta-analysis with Variance Components |
|
|
185 | (10) |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
|
185 | (2) |
|
|
187 | (2) |
|
|
189 | (3) |
|
|
192 | (3) |
|
|
193 | (2) |
|
17 Ensembled Correlation Coefficients |
|
|
195 | (10) |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
17.2 Ensemble Learning with SPSS Modeler |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
|
197 | (6) |
|
|
203 | (2) |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
|
205 | (12) |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
18.2 Ensemble Learning with SPSS Modeler |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
|
207 | (8) |
|
|
215 | (2) |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
19 Multivariate Meta-analysis |
|
|
217 | (16) |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
|
218 | (4) |
|
|
222 | (4) |
|
|
226 | (5) |
|
|
231 | (2) |
|
|
231 | (2) |
|
20 Transforming Odds Ratios into Correlation Coefficients |
|
|
233 | (10) |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
20.2 Unweighted Odds Ratios as Effect Size Calculators |
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
20.3 Regression Coefficients and Correlation Coefficients as Replacement of Odds Ratios |
|
|
234 | (4) |
|
20.4 Examples of Approximation Methods for Computing Correlation Coefficients from Odds Ratios |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
20.4.1 The Yule Approximation |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
20.4.2 The Ulrich Approximation |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
20.5 Computing Tetrachoric Correlation Coefficients from an Odds Ratio |
|
|
239 | (2) |
|
|
241 | (2) |
|
|
242 | (1) |
|
21 Meta-analyses with Direct and Indirect Comparisons |
|
|
243 | (6) |
|
|
243 | (1) |
|
21.2 Challenging the Exchangeability Assumption |
|
|
244 | (1) |
|
21.3 Frequentists' Methods for Indirect Comparisons |
|
|
244 | (1) |
|
21.4 The Confidence Intervals Methods for Indirect Comparisons |
|
|
245 | (2) |
|
|
247 | (1) |
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
22 Contrast Coefficients Meta-analysis |
|
|
249 | (12) |
|
|
249 | (1) |
|
|
250 | (2) |
|
22.3 Fixed Effect Meta-analysis |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
22.4 Random Effect Meta-analysis |
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
22.5 Principles of Linear Contrast Testing |
|
|
254 | (1) |
|
22.6 Null Hypothesis Testing of Linear Contrasts |
|
|
255 | (1) |
|
22.7 Pocket Calculator One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) of Linear Contrasts |
|
|
256 | (1) |
|
22.8 Contrast Testing Using One Way Analysis of Variance on SPSS Statistical Software |
|
|
257 | (1) |
|
|
258 | (3) |
|
|
259 | (2) |
|
23 Meta-analysis with Evolutionary Operations (EVOPs) |
|
|
261 | (8) |
|
|
261 | (1) |
|
23.2 Example of the Meta-analysis of Three Studies Assessing Determinants of Infectious Disease |
|
|
262 | (1) |
|
|
263 | (1) |
|
|
263 | (2) |
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
23.6 Meta-analysis of the Above Three Studies |
|
|
266 | (1) |
|
|
267 | (2) |
|
|
267 | (2) |
|
24 Meta-analysis with Heterogeneity as Null-Hypothesis |
|
|
269 | (10) |
|
|
269 | (1) |
|
24.2 Heterogeneity Rather Than Homogeneity of Studies as Null-Hypothesis |
|
|
270 | (2) |
|
24.3 Frequency Distribution of the Treatments |
|
|
272 | (1) |
|
24.4 Beneficial Effects of the Treatments, Histograms |
|
|
272 | (1) |
|
24.5 Beneficial Effects of Treatments, Clusters |
|
|
273 | (1) |
|
24.6 Beneficial Effects of Treatments, Network of Causal Associations Displayed as a Web |
|
|
274 | (1) |
|
24.7 Beneficial Effects of Treatments, Decision Trees |
|
|
275 | (1) |
|
24.8 Beneficial Effects of Treatments, Accuracy Assessment of Decision Tree Output |
|
|
276 | (1) |
|
|
276 | (3) |
|
|
277 | (2) |
|
25 Meta-analytic Thinking and Other Spin-Offs of Meta-analysis |
|
|
279 | (20) |
|
|
279 | (1) |
|
|
279 | (1) |
|
25.3 Meta-analytic Graphing |
|
|
280 | (2) |
|
25.4 Meta-analytic Thinking in Writing Study Protocols and Reports |
|
|
282 | (2) |
|
25.5 Meta-analytic Forest Plots of Baseline Patient Characteristics |
|
|
284 | (3) |
|
25.6 Meta-analysis of Forest Plots of Propensity Scores |
|
|
287 | (3) |
|
25.7 Meta-analytic Thinking: Effect Size Assessments of Important Scientific Issues Other Than the Main Study Outcomes |
|
|
290 | (2) |
|
25.8 Forest Plots for Assessing and Adjusting Baseline Characteristic Imbalance |
|
|
292 | (1) |
|
25.9 Sensitivity Analysis |
|
|
293 | (1) |
|
25.10 Pooled Odds Ratios for Multidimensional Outcome Effects |
|
|
294 | (2) |
|
25.11 Ratios of Odds Ratios for Subgroup Analyses |
|
|
296 | (2) |
|
|
298 | (1) |
|
|
298 | (1) |
|
|
299 | (10) |
|
26.1 Introduction, Condensed Review of the Past |
|
|
299 | (1) |
|
26.2 Condensed Review of the Current Edition and Novel Developments |
|
|
300 | (1) |
|
26.3 Meta-analysis of Studies Tested with Analyses of Variance |
|
|
301 | (2) |
|
26.4 Meta-analyses of Crossover Trials with Binary Outcomes |
|
|
303 | (1) |
|
26.5 Equivalence Study Meta-analysis |
|
|
304 | (2) |
|
26.6 Agenda-Driven Meta-analyses |
|
|
306 | (1) |
|
26.7 Hills' Plurality of Reasoning Statement, Evidence Based Medicine Avant la Lettre |
|
|
307 | (1) |
|
|
307 | (2) |
|
|
308 | (1) |
Index |
|
309 | |