In memoriam |
|
xiii | |
|
Acknowledgements |
|
xv | |
|
|
1 | (34) |
|
Absolute non-occurrences and the arbitrariness of syntax |
|
|
3 | (5) |
|
Pinker's account of ``negative'' exceptions |
|
|
4 | (3) |
|
Syntactic and morphological non-occurrences |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
Arbitrariness and conventionality in Usage-based Grammar |
|
|
8 | (4) |
|
Constructions and syntactic arbitrariness |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
Usage-based Grammar and relative frequency of use |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
Syntax as compositional routines |
|
|
12 | (8) |
|
Inference: the key to syntactic computation |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
Accounting for syntactic variation and ``negative exceptions'' |
|
|
16 | (3) |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
The non-arbitrary compositionality of Spanish clitic clusters |
|
|
20 | (15) |
|
PART I. The morphological roots of Spanish clitic syntax |
|
|
|
The problem: Unacceptable clitic clusters |
|
|
35 | (14) |
|
|
36 | (4) |
|
Absolutely non-occurring cluster, with clitic alternative: le lo |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
Absolutely non-occurring cluster, lacking clitic alternative: se se |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
Interpretation-dependent unacceptable clusters |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
The nature of the problem |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
Previous handling of the issue(s) |
|
|
41 | (3) |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
me (Acc) le (Dat) + non-coreferential subject |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
spur. se + le vs. OK refl. se + le |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
spur. se + me (Dat) + lo (Acc) |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
|
44 | (5) |
|
The communicative value of clitic reference |
|
|
49 | (18) |
|
The verbal complex (= VC) |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
The participancy oppositions |
|
|
51 | (4) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
52 | (2) |
|
Case and the nature of the event |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
|
55 | (12) |
|
Central vs. Peripheral case |
|
|
55 | (5) |
|
Variably Peripheral involvements |
|
|
60 | (7) |
|
|
67 | (28) |
|
Double mention, role-levelling, and event-introversion |
|
|
67 | (9) |
|
Introversion of transitive events |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
Introversion of intransitive events |
|
|
72 | (2) |
|
Semantic versatility of double mention |
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
Clitic vs. non-clitic reference |
|
|
76 | (3) |
|
Lexical reference: Bare noun phrases |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
Prepositional phrases, a-phrases |
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
``Understood'' participants |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
Cumulation of clitic and extra-verbal reference |
|
|
79 | (16) |
|
(Im)possibility of duplicate reference |
|
|
81 | (2) |
|
Pragmatic motivation of clitic duplication |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
Factors conditioning reference-duplication |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
Lexical vs. pronominal a-phrase |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
Variable obligatoriness of clitic reference with diverse Dat roles |
|
|
85 | (2) |
|
Clitic duplication as an inferential manoeuvre |
|
|
87 | (8) |
|
Variable clitic-cluster acceptability |
|
|
95 | (36) |
|
Participancy and case-categorization |
|
|
95 | (4) |
|
Participant vs. non-participant involvement |
|
|
95 | (2) |
|
Central vs. Peripheral participation |
|
|
97 | (2) |
|
Interpretation of case-neutral clitics |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
The interpretation of clitic clusters |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
Centrifugal events: Dative + Accusative participants |
|
|
100 | (7) |
|
1st vs. 3*rd ps participants |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
IInd vs. 3*rd ps Dative in me le cluster |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
Relative activeness of the Dat under single mention of the p.i.f. |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
1st person as double mentioned p.i.f. |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
Relative activeness of the Dat under double mention of the p.i.f. |
|
|
103 | (2) |
|
Person of the double-mentioned p.i.f., plus 3*rd ps Dat |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
Asymmetry between 1st/2nd and 3rd person p.i.f |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
Person of the Dat with a distinct human DO, under single mention |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
Clitic vs. a-phrase reference for distinct Dat vs. Acc |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
1st vs. 2nd ps participants |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
Distinct 3*rd ps participants |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
Same 3*rd person in both Dative and Accusative roles |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
Syntagmatic differentiation of Peripheral roles |
|
|
109 | (6) |
|
All Dat participants distinct from the p.i.f. |
|
|
110 | (3) |
|
Multiple Dat role/referent allotment under double mention |
|
|
113 | (2) |
|
Clitic clustering in centripetal events |
|
|
115 | (6) |
|
Subject Complement (SC) plus Peripheral roles |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
Distinct DO plus Object Complement (OC) |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
Double mention of the p.i.f. and S/O Complementation |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
Subject Complement + double mention as Peripheral involvement of the p.i.f. |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
Event introversion + Subject Complement |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
Double mentioned p.i.f in a DO role + Object Complement |
|
|
119 | (2) |
|
Summary and partial conclusions |
|
|
121 | (10) |
|
Accounting for all the uses of Sp. se |
|
|
131 | (26) |
|
|
131 | (3) |
|
|
132 | (2) |
|
The number of se's in Modern Spanish |
|
|
134 | (2) |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
|
134 | (2) |
|
The unitary meaning of se |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
Three inferential routines |
|
|
136 | (14) |
|
Case-based identification of se's positive referent: the se + lo cluster |
|
|
137 | (3) |
|
``Spurious'' se and the migrant pl. -s |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
The absolute non-occurrence of *le lo. |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
Cognitive economy and the lelo/selo contrast |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
Self-salience of 3rd ps p.i.f.'s |
|
|
143 | (2) |
|
Focus defeasing by impersonal se |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
The pragmatic value of imp. se. |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
The morpho-syntactic need for se |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
The inferential mechanics of focus defeasing |
|
|
147 | (3) |
|
|
150 | (7) |
|
Accounting for the non-uses of Sp. se |
|
|
157 | (28) |
|
The variable acceptability of se me lo V3 |
|
|
157 | (4) |
|
Negative reference of se: imp. se + me lo |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
Positive reference of Dat se: se lo + me |
|
|
158 | (3) |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
Impossible reference by se to a 3*rd person |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
Impossible * se se clusters |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
Context-dependence of se's diverse interpretations |
|
|
163 | (5) |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
se lo V3sg: imp. se vs. refl. se |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
se lo V3sg: imp. se vs. spur. se |
|
|
166 | (2) |
|
The interpretation of se in non-finite VC's |
|
|
168 | (2) |
|
Independent support for the analysis of se |
|
|
170 | (4) |
|
Clitic duplication and the positive/negative reference of se |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
Cliticization of se in auxiliary periphrases |
|
|
171 | (3) |
|
Disjoint se.....se sequences in auxiliary periphrases |
|
|
174 | (11) |
|
Focus-defeasing se followed by positively referring se |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
Consecutive positive interpretations of se |
|
|
176 | (9) |
|
PART II. Clitic distribution in complex Verb-Phrases |
|
|
|
The syntactic structure of AcI's |
|
|
185 | (14) |
|
Cliticization in complex VP's |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
Semanto-syntactic indeterminacy in AcI's |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
AcI-roles: shared participants |
|
|
188 | (2) |
|
Clitic vs. lexical reference to AcI-roles |
|
|
190 | (2) |
|
Conflicting pressures on clitic clustering at Vx |
|
|
192 | (7) |
|
|
199 | (12) |
|
Case-categorization in AcI's |
|
|
199 | (4) |
|
Context-sensitiveness of M's case-variability |
|
|
201 | (2) |
|
Concatenation vs. conflation of AcI's |
|
|
203 | (8) |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
Non-equivalence of different AcI formulations |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
Semanto-pragmatic distinctness of conflated and non-conflated variants |
|
|
205 | (6) |
|
Clitic placement in AcI's |
|
|
211 | (22) |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
Role/referent allotment in dynamic transitive AcI's: M + Oa clusters |
|
|
212 | (4) |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
Uniconic backgrounding of M |
|
|
214 | (2) |
|
Conflation in static AcI's |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
|
217 | (2) |
|
Reference at Vx to the Od of dynamic Inf's |
|
|
219 | (7) |
|
M + Od (=IO) with a further DO (Oa) |
|
|
220 | (3) |
|
M + Od with verbs of communication |
|
|
223 | (2) |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
Summary: clitic clustering in centrifugal AcI's |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
Clitic placement in AcI's with copulative events |
|
|
227 | (6) |
|
|
228 | (5) |
|
Complex role/referent allotment in AcI's |
|
|
233 | (32) |
|
|
233 | (4) |
|
Variable double mention of M |
|
|
234 | (2) |
|
M's double mention and clitic fronting |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
S in a non-focus AcI-role |
|
|
237 | (14) |
|
|
239 | (3) |
|
Heterogenous clusters with S in a non-focus AcI-role |
|
|
242 | (1) |
|
|
243 | (1) |
|
|
243 | (1) |
|
|
244 | (2) |
|
Dynamic transitive AcI: =SO + M |
|
|
246 | (2) |
|
S = O, double mentioned M |
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
|
249 | (1) |
|
Indeterminate double mention of M |
|
|
250 | (1) |
|
AcI's and ``clitic climbing'' |
|
|
251 | (3) |
|
|
254 | (11) |
|
Clitic placement in AcI's and their look-alikes |
|
|
265 | (24) |
|
The syntactic relation of Inf to Vx |
|
|
265 | (3) |
|
|
268 | (4) |
|
Vx + [ Z] + Inf auxiliary periphrases |
|
|
270 | (2) |
|
|
272 | (3) |
|
Vx + [ Z] + Inf Control structures |
|
|
274 | (1) |
|
Between control structures and AcI's |
|
|
275 | (4) |
|
|
275 | (1) |
|
|
276 | (2) |
|
mirar `to look at, watch' |
|
|
278 | (1) |
|
The place of AcI's in the syn-tactic landscape |
|
|
279 | (10) |
|
|
289 | (8) |
|
|
289 | (2) |
|
|
291 | (1) |
|
The nature of syntax and the nature of language |
|
|
291 | (2) |
|
|
293 | (4) |
Abbreviations |
|
297 | (1) |
Glossary |
|
298 | (9) |
References |
|
307 | (19) |
Corpus |
|
326 | (3) |
Name index |
|
329 | (4) |
Subject index |
|
333 | |