Foreword |
|
9 | (1) |
|
|
Acknowledgements |
|
10 | (1) |
Abbreviations |
|
11 | (2) |
Prologue |
|
13 | (2) |
|
Chapter 1 Who is Charlene? |
|
|
15 | (10) |
|
Chapter 2 Charlene's final illness |
|
|
25 | (8) |
|
24 Hour Surgery in Bealey Avenue |
|
|
25 | (2) |
|
|
27 | (6) |
|
Chapter 3 A change of diagnosis |
|
|
33 | (12) |
|
|
33 | (12) |
|
Chapter 4 The family's life changes forever |
|
|
45 | (12) |
|
Initial police investigations |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
|
46 | (2) |
|
The investigation continues |
|
|
48 | (4) |
|
Child, Youth and Family involvement |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
Charlene is buried and the family returns home |
|
|
53 | (2) |
|
|
55 | (2) |
|
Chapter 5 After the arrest |
|
|
57 | (4) |
|
|
57 | (2) |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
Chapter 6 Enter expert witnesses for the defence |
|
|
61 | (8) |
|
My role as medical adviser for the case |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
Assessing the forensic science |
|
|
62 | (4) |
|
A dearth of expert witnesses in New Zealand |
|
|
66 | (3) |
|
Chapter 7 The first trial |
|
|
69 | (8) |
|
The case for the prosecution |
|
|
69 | (6) |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
Chapter 8 Short-lived freedom |
|
|
77 | (8) |
|
Post-trial report commissioned by the Crown |
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
|
79 | (3) |
|
Hearing in the Court of Appeal |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
|
83 | (2) |
|
Chapter 9 The waiting days |
|
|
85 | (4) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (3) |
|
Chapter 10 Further forensic testing |
|
|
89 | (8) |
|
Explaining the forensic science |
|
|
89 | (2) |
|
|
91 | (4) |
|
|
95 | (2) |
|
Chapter 11 Expert medical witnesses for the second trial |
|
|
97 | (8) |
|
Professor Sebastian Lucas, world expert in HIV histopathology |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
Professor Michael Sharland, expert in infectious diseases in children |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
Dr Simon Nadel, children's intensive care consultant |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
Dr Nathaniel Cary, Home Office forensic pathologist |
|
|
101 | (2) |
|
Dr David Hammer, microbiologist |
|
|
103 | (2) |
|
Chapter 12 Double jeopardy in action |
|
|
105 | (30) |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
Witnesses called by the Crown |
|
|
106 | (12) |
|
Medical expert witnesses called by the Crown |
|
|
118 | (2) |
|
Forensic scientist witnesses called by the Crown |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
Further Crown evidence from police |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
|
122 | (11) |
|
|
133 | (2) |
|
Chapter 13 Legal ramifications |
|
|
135 | (8) |
|
The influence of medical opinion on the investigation |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
Medical expert witnesses for the prosecution |
|
|
135 | (2) |
|
Timing of the briefs provided by the Crown expert witnesses |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
Difficulty obtaining expert witnesses for the defence |
|
|
138 | (2) |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
The challenge of double jeopardy |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
Publication of the case in the scientific literature |
|
|
141 | (2) |
|
Chapter 14 Good versus bad science |
|
|
143 | (8) |
|
Good science tests hypotheses |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
With the best of intentions |
|
|
143 | (2) |
|
Evidence gathering by the ESR |
|
|
145 | (2) |
|
Reporting and interpretation of the clinical findings |
|
|
147 | (2) |
|
Autopsy focused on sexual trauma and suffocation |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
When does good science turn bad? |
|
|
149 | (2) |
|
|
151 | (6) |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
Hickam's Dictum not Occam's Razor |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
|
154 | (3) |
Aftermath |
|
157 | (2) |
Notes |
|
159 | |