Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Nationalism and Private Law in Europe [Minkštas viršelis]

(Birkbeck College, University of London, UK)
  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 332 pages, aukštis x plotis: 234x156 mm, weight: 467 g
  • Serija: Modern Studies in European Law
  • Išleidimo metai: 25-Aug-2016
  • Leidėjas: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 1509907416
  • ISBN-13: 9781509907410
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 332 pages, aukštis x plotis: 234x156 mm, weight: 467 g
  • Serija: Modern Studies in European Law
  • Išleidimo metai: 25-Aug-2016
  • Leidėjas: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 1509907416
  • ISBN-13: 9781509907410
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
While the internationalisation of society has stimulated the emergence of common legal frameworks to coordinate transnational social relations, private law itself is firmly rooted in national law. European integration processes have altered this state of affairs to a limited degree with a few, albeit groundbreaking, interventions that have tended to engender resistance from various actors within European nation-states. Against that background, this book takes as its point of departure the need to understand the process of legal denationalisation within broader political frameworks. In particular it seeks to make sense of opposition to Europeanisation at this point in the evolution of European law when, despite growing nationalist attitudes, great efforts have been made to produce comprehensive legal instruments to synthesise general contract law - an area that has traditionally been solely within the ambit of nation-states. Combining insights from the disciplines of law, history and political science, the book investigates the conceptual and cultural associations between law and the nation-state, examines the impact of nationalist ideas in modern legal thought and reveals the nationalist underpinnings of some of the arguments employed against and, somewhat paradoxically, even in support of legal Europeanisation. The author's research for this book has been supported by the Hague Institute for the Internationalisation of Law. [ Subject: National Law, Private Law, European Law]
Table of Cases
xi
Table of Legislation
xiii
Introduction 1(19)
1.1 Nationalism
4(4)
1.1.1 From Nationalism to Supranationalism
4(2)
1.1.2 The Persistence of Nationalism
6(2)
1.2 Private Law in Europe
8(5)
1.2.1 The Acquis Communautaire
9(1)
1.2.2 Plans for Further Europeanisation
10(3)
1.3 Methodology
13(4)
1.3.1 Descriptive Character
13(1)
1.3.2 European Union as Multinational and Multi-level System
14(2)
1.3.3 Considered Countries
16(1)
1.4 Structure and Topics
17(3)
1 Nationalism
20(48)
1.1 Approaching Nationalism
20(14)
1.1.1 How Many Nationalisms are There?
21(2)
1.1.2 Interpreting Nationalism
23(2)
1.1.3 The Awakening of the Nation: Primordialism
25(2)
1.1.4 The Invention of the Nation: Modernism
27(2)
1.1.4.1 Techniques of Nation-building
29(2)
1.1.4.2 Reasons for Nation-building
31(1)
1.1.5 Primordialism vs Modernism?
32(2)
1.2 Ideas of the Nation-state
34(11)
1.2.1 The Political and the National Unit
35(1)
1.2.2 Ethnic Nationalism
36(2)
1.2.3 Civic Nationalism
38(1)
1.2.4 From Civic Nationalism to Constitutional Patriotism
39(2)
1.2.5 Cultural Nationalism
41(2)
1.2.6 Is There a Good and a Bad Nationalism?
43(2)
1.3 Why a State Should be National
45(19)
1.3.1 Nationalism and Liberalism
46(2)
1.3.2 Nation and Culture Coincide
48(2)
1.3.3 Information
50(2)
1.3.4 Democracy
52(2)
1.3.5 Solidarity
54(3)
1.3.6 Justice
57(3)
1.3.7 Do Nation and Culture Coincide?
60(2)
1.3.8 National versus Social Identities: Notes on Socialism
62(2)
1.4 The Convenience of Nationalism
64(2)
1.5 Conclusion
66(2)
2 Nationalisation and Denationalisation
68(63)
2.1 The Development of National Law
68(42)
2.1.1 From a Common to a National Private Law
71(4)
2.1.2 Between Civic, Cultural and Ethnic Nationalism: Germany
75(3)
2.1.3 Civic
78(3)
2.1.4 Cultural
81(2)
2.1.4.1 Intellectual Background
83(3)
2.1.4.2 The Volksgeist Theory
86(3)
2.1.4.3 Volksgeist and Language
89(2)
2.1.4.4 Diffusion of the Volksgeist Theory
91(1)
2.1.4.5 In Europe
92(3)
2.1.4.6 In the USA
95(3)
2.1.5 From Cultural to Ethnic
98(2)
2.1.6 Racist
100(6)
2.1.7 Back to Culture
106(2)
2.1.8 The Impact on Today's Legal Systems
108(2)
2.2 Private Law as a Nation-building Tool
110(11)
2.2.1 Homogenisation by Inclusion
112(2)
2.2.2 Homogenisation by Exclusion
114(2)
2.2.2.1 Constitutional Aspects
116(2)
2.2.2.2 A Brief Digression: Non-discrimination in Europe
118(3)
2.3 The Denationalisation of Private Law
121(10)
2.3.1 Before and after the Wars: Faith and Distrust
122(3)
2.3.2 Denationalisation and Renationalisation
125(6)
3 Why Private Law Should be National
131(98)
3.1 The Economic Argument
134(27)
3.1.1 The Ideal Locus of Private Law in the European Context
135(1)
3.1.1.1 Normative Implications of the Argument
135(5)
3.1.1.2 The Challenging Nature of Distance Relationships
140(2)
3.1.1.3 Democracy Issues
142(3)
3.1.1.4 Heterogeneity of Preferences
145(2)
3.1.1.5 The Decentralisation Theorem in Economics and Politics
147(3)
3.1.1.6 Problematic Aspects for European Private Law
150(1)
3.1.1.7 Geographical Proximity
151(2)
3.1.1.8 A Slippery Slope to Balkanisation
153(2)
3.1.2 The Argument in Light of Different Political Theories
155(1)
3.1.2.1 Communitarian and Cosmopolitan Perspectives
155(2)
3.1.2.2 Nationalist Perspective
157(1)
3.1.2.3 Cultural Similarity and the Economic Argument
158(3)
3.2 The Social Argument
161(22)
3.2.1 Social Justice in the European Context
163(3)
3.2.1.1 Normative Implications of the Argument
166(1)
3.2.1.2 Absence of a European Model of Justice
167(1)
3.2.1.3 Fundamental Rights, Justice and Harmonisation
168(3)
3.2.1.4 The Stance of European Law
171(3)
3.2.2 The Argument in Light of Different Political Theories
174(1)
3.2.2.1 Communitarian Perspective
175(1)
3.2.2.2 Nationalist Perspective
176(2)
3.2.2.3 Fortune of Communitarian and Nationalist Conceptions
178(1)
3.2.2.4 Cosmopolitan Perspective
179(4)
3.3 The Cultural Argument
183(46)
3.3.1 Culture as a Value
185(2)
3.3.2 Interactions of Law and Culture
187(2)
3.3.2.1 Transferability Thesis
189(1)
3.3.2.2 Non-transferability Thesis
190(1)
3.3.3 Law and Culture in the European Context
191(1)
3.3.3.1 Normative Implications
192(1)
3.3.3.2 Distinguishing Cultural and Technical Aspects
193(3)
3.3.3.3 Inescapability of National Categories?
196(1)
3.3.3.4 Future Convergence or Eternal Divergence?
197(2)
3.3.4 Analysing Cultures
199(1)
3.3.4.1 Legal Culture and Comparative Law
200(1)
3.3.4.2 Cultural Classifications
201(2)
3.3.4.3 Controversial Aspects of Cultural Classifications
203(1)
3.3.4.4 Culture as Nation
204(3)
3.3.4.5 Description as Explanation
207(2)
3.3.4.6 Cultural Classifications in Historical Perspective
209(1)
3.3.4.7 The Use of Cultural Classifications in Legal Studies
210(2)
3.3.4.8 Conclusion
212(2)
3.3.5 The Argument in Light of Different Political Theories
214(1)
3.3.5.1 The Nationalist Perspective
215(2)
3.3.5.2 Legal Culture as National Legal Culture
217(1)
3.3.5.3 Cultural Homogeneity and the Legal Order
218(2)
3.3.5.4 Concealing Ideological Distinctions
220(2)
3.3.5.5 Non-nationalist Perspectives
222(3)
3.3.5.6 Legal Significance of Multiple Identities
225(1)
3.3.5.7 Multiple Identities and the Process of Europeanisation
226(2)
3.3.6 Concluding Remarks
228(1)
4 Euronationalism
229(39)
4.1 The Idea of Europe
230(4)
4.2 Reasons for Europe-building
234(2)
4.3 The European Identity
236(11)
4.3.1 Does a European Identity Exist?
240(1)
4.3.2 Political Meaning of a European Identity
241(1)
4.3.3 Constitutional Europatriotism
242(2)
4.3.4 What are the European Values?
244(3)
4.4 Law as a Europe-building Tool
247(13)
4.4.1 Public Law
247(2)
4.4.2 Private Law
249(1)
4.4.2.1 Promoting Unity Through Civil Codifications
249(5)
4.4.2.2 Promoting Values and Culture Through Material Private Law
254(4)
4.4.2.3 Fundamental Rights and Social Justice
258(2)
4.5 European Culture
260(4)
4.6 Perspectives of Nation and Europe-building
264(4)
Conclusion 268(9)
Bibliography 277(25)
Index 302
Guido Comparato is a postdoctoral researcher in the Law Department of the European University Institute.