Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Nature and Value of Knowledge: Three Investigations [Kietas viršelis]

(University of Stirling), (University of Stirling), (Edinburgh University)
  • Formatas: Hardback, 288 pages, aukštis x plotis x storis: 241x162x25 mm, weight: 590 g
  • Išleidimo metai: 20-May-2010
  • Leidėjas: Oxford University Press
  • ISBN-10: 0199586268
  • ISBN-13: 9780199586264
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: Hardback, 288 pages, aukštis x plotis x storis: 241x162x25 mm, weight: 590 g
  • Išleidimo metai: 20-May-2010
  • Leidėjas: Oxford University Press
  • ISBN-10: 0199586268
  • ISBN-13: 9780199586264
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
'The culmination of long collaboration, this tryptich combines the latest by three outstanding contributors. The outcome is three illuminating panels on knowledge, its nature and value, and in one case more specifically on self-knowledge. Anyone with an interest in these topics will want to read this book, and others who read it are likely soon to acquire an interest.'-Ernest Sosa, Board of Governors Professor of Philosophy, Rutgers University

'Pritchard's discussion of the nature and value of knowledge is first-rate. His framing of the various problems around the value of knowledge significantly advances current discussion of the relevant issues, to the point that, in my opinion, it is far and away the best available. Millar's discussion of the epistemology of testimony draws from his earlier work on understanding language and action, and is also neatly integrated into his accounts of perceptual knowledge and indicator knowledge in earlier chapters. This discussion is also very interesting. His arguments against reductionism, and his own anti-reductionist approach, are original and compelling. Haddock's contribution is a very interesting discussion that merits attention.'-John Greco, Leonard and Elizabeth Eslick Chair in Philosophy, Saint Louis University

'The Nature and Value of Knowledge is an excellent book for those interested in either topic mentioned in the title. As one would expect, the issues of the nature and value of knowledge are deeply intertwined, and all three investigations undertaken in the book respect this fact. Indeed, each author has much original to say about both. What makes this book truly unique is that it is focused on two closely related topics, yet at the same time it encompasses a multiplicity of perspectives, in terms of philosophical method, substance and style. Anyone interested specifically in the issue of the value of knowledge would do well to read it. It's an added bonus that there are worthy contributions to the much larger literature on the nature of knowledge as well.'-Wayne Riggs, University of Oklahoma

This volume comprises three distinct investigations into the relationship between the nature and the value of knowledge. Each is written by one of the authors in consultation with the other two. 'Knowledge and Understanding' (by Duncan Pritchard) critically examines virtue-theoretic responses to the problem of the value of knowledge, and argues that the finally valuable cognitive state is not knowledge but understanding. 'Knowledge and Recognition' (by Alan Millar) develops an account of knowledge in which the idea of a recognitional ability plays a prominent role, and argues that this account enables us better to understand knowledge and its value. 'Knowledge and Action" by Adrian Haddock argues for an account. Of knowledge and justification which explains why certain species of knowledge are valuable, and enables us to make sense of the knowledge we have of our intentional actions.

This volume comprises three distinct investigations into the relationship between the nature and the value of knowledge. Each is written by one of the authors in consultation with the other two. 'Knowledge and Understanding' (by Duncan Pritchard) critically examines virtue-theoretic responses to the problem of the value of knowledge, and argues that the finally valuable cognitive state is not knowledge but understanding. 'Knowledge and Recognition' (by Alan Millar) develops an account of knowledge in which the idea of a recognitional ability plays a prominent role, and argues that this account enables us better to understand knowledge and its value. 'Knowledge and Action' (by Adrian Haddock) argues for an account of knowledge and justification which explains why knowledge is valuable, and enables us to make sense of the knowledge we have of our intentional actions.

Recenzijos

a superb, well-rounded view of some of the latest thinking on the nature and value of knowledge. * Stephen Grimm, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews * The culmination of a long collaboration, this tryptich combines the latest by three outstanding contributers. The outcome is three illuminating panels on knowledge, its nature and value, and in one case specifically on self-knowledge. Anyone with an interest in these topics will want to read this book, and others who read it are likely to soon acquire an interest. * Ernest Sosa, Board of Governors Professor of Philosophy, Rutgers University * Pritchard's discussion of the nature and value of knowledge is first- rate. His framing of the various problems around the value of knowledge significantly advances current discussion of the relevant issues, to the point that, in my opinion, it is far and away the best available. Millar's discussion of the epistemology of testimony draws from his earlier work on understanding language and action, and is also neatly integrated into his accounts of perceptual knowledge and indicator knowledge in earlier chapters. This discussion is also very interesting. His arguments against reductionism, and his own anti-reductionist approach, are original and compelling. Haddock's contribution is a very interesting discussion that merits attention. * John Greco, Leonard and Elizabeth Eslick Chair in Philosophy, Saint Louis University * The Nature and Value of Knowledge is an excellent book for those interested in either topic mentioned in the title. As one would expect, the issues of the nature and value of knowledge are deeply intertwined, and all three investigations undertaken in the book respect this fact. Indeed, each author has much original to say about both. What makes this book truly unique is that it is focused on two closely related topics, yet at the same time it encompasses a multiplicity of perspectives, in terms of philosophical method, substance and style. Anyone interested specifically in the issue of the value of knowledge would do well to read it. It's an added bonus that there are worthy contributions to the much larger literature on the nature of knowledge as well. * Wayne Riggs, University of Oklahoma * This volume ... is a feast of contemporary epistemology approached through the question of how to account for the value of knowledge. Each contribution is highly readable, each quickly carries readers towards the cutting edge of discussions in recent epistemological literature, and each adds important, original arguments to those discussions. * Peter Tramel, Philosophy * Pritchard, Millar and Haddock, in their distinct and distinctive contributions to this book, examine the nature of knowledge in general and of certain species of knowledge, as well as the value of knowledge and of other epistemic standings. This is a superb and stimulating work, where each contribution stakes out and defends an original position in the field of epistemology. There is much here that merits serious attention. * Daniel Whiting, The Philosophical Quarterly *

Part I: Knowledge And Understanding Analytical Table Of Contents 3(88)
1 The Value Problem for Knowledge
5(20)
1.1 The Value Problem
5(1)
1.2 Unpacking the Value Problem
5(3)
1.3 The Swamping Problem
8(3)
1.4 Fundamental and Non-fundamental Epistemic Goods
11(2)
1.5 The Relevance of Epistemic Value Monism
13(3)
1.6 Responding to the Swamping Problem I: The Practical Response
16(2)
1.7 Responding to the Swamping Problem II: The Monistic Response
18(2)
1.8 Responding to the Swamping Problem III: The Pluralist Response
20(3)
1.9 Concluding Remarks
23(2)
2 Knowledge and Final Value
25(23)
2.1 Introduction
25(1)
2.2 Robust Virtue Epistemology
25(3)
2.3 Knowledge and Achievement
28(5)
2.4 Interlude: Is Robust Virtue Epistemology a Reductive Theory of Knowledge?
33(1)
2.5 Achievement without Knowledge
34(6)
2.6 Knowledge without Achievement
40(4)
2.7 Back to the Value Problem
44(2)
2.8 Concluding Remarks
46(2)
3 Anti-Luck Virtue Epistemology
48(18)
3.1 Introduction
48(1)
3.2 Contra Virtue Epistemology
48(3)
3.3 Two Master Intuitions about Knowledge
51(3)
3.4 Anti-luck Virtue Epistemology
54(4)
3.5 Interlude: Is Anti-luck Virtue Epistemology a Reductive Theory of Knowledge?
58(1)
3.6 Diagnosing the Structure of Knowledge
59(3)
3.7 Back to the Value Problem
62(3)
3.8 Concluding Remarks
65(1)
4 Understanding
66(25)
4.1 Introduction
66(1)
4.2 The Final Value of Achievements
66(7)
4.3 Understanding
73(4)
4.4 Understanding and Epistemic Luck
77(3)
4.5 Understanding and Cognitive Achievement
80(3)
4.6 Back to the Value Problem
83(1)
4.7 Two Potential Implications of the Distinctive Value of Understanding Thesis
84(2)
4.8 Concluding Remarks
86(5)
Part II: Knowledge And Recognition Analytical Table Of Contents 91(100)
5 Knowledge in Recent Epistemology: Some Problems
97(23)
5.1 Introduction
97(2)
5.2 The Traditional Analytical Project and the Central Tension
99(11)
5.3 Knowledge, Evidence, and Reasons
110(5)
5.4 Concepts versus Phenomena
115(3)
5.5 The Way Ahead
118(2)
6 Perceptual Knowledge and Recognitional Abilities
120(24)
6.1 Introduction
120(4)
6.2 Perceptual-recognitional Abilities
124(4)
6.3 Broad and Narrow Competence
128(5)
6.4 Avoiding Reduction
133(4)
6.5 Perceptual Knowledge and Justified Belief
137(3)
6.6 Closure and Doxastic Responsibility
140(4)
7 Knowledge from Indicators
144(20)
7.1 Introduction
144(5)
7.2 Knowledge from Indicators
149(2)
7.3 Recognitional Abilities Again
151(4)
7.4 Detached Standing Knowledge
155(4)
7.5 Back to Knowledge from Indicators
159(3)
7.6 Taking Stock
162(2)
8 The Social Transmission of Knowledge
164(27)
8.1 Why Knowledge Matters
164(5)
8.2 Approaching the Epistemology of Testimony
169(8)
8.3 Telling and Informing
177(2)
8.4 Acquiring True Beliefs and Acquiring Knowledge through being Told
179(7)
8.5 Access to Facts about Knowledge
186(5)
Part III: Knowledge And Action Analytical Table Of Contents 191(70)
9 Knowledge and Justification
195(24)
9.1 Introductory Remarks
195(3)
9.2 The Modest Route
198(4)
9.3 Fool's Knowledge
202(2)
9.4 The Distinctive Value of Knowledge
204(6)
9.5 Fool's Justification
210(2)
9.6 Arguing from Illusion
212(2)
9.7 The Regress of Justifications
214(3)
9.8 Concluding Remarks
217(2)
10 Second-Order Knowledge
219(22)
10.1 Introductory Remarks
219(1)
10.2 Transparency and Knowledge
220(3)
10.3 Transparency and Entitlement
223(3)
10.4 On Trying to do without Transparency
226(2)
10.5 Transparency and Luminosity
228(5)
10.6 Non-sensible Knowledge
233(3)
10.7 Self-knowledge
236(3)
10.8 Concluding Remarks
239(2)
11 Knowledge of Action
241(20)
11.1 Introductory Remarks
241(1)
11.2 Non-sensible Knowledge of Action
242(3)
11.3 The Two Dimensions
245(3)
11.4 The Distinctive Value of Knowledge of Action
248(2)
11.5 Non-observational Knowledge
250(3)
11.6 Practical Knowledge and Intention
253(3)
11.7 Practical Knowledge and Direction of Fit
256(3)
11.8 Concluding Remarks
259(2)
Bibliography 261(10)
Index 271
Duncan Pritchard is a Professor of Philosophy at the University of Edinburgh. His work is mainly in the area of epistemology, in which he has published widely. His books include Epistemic Luck (Oxford University Press, 2005), What is this Thing Called Knowledge? (Routledge, 2006), and Knowledge (Palgrave, 2009).

Alan Millar has taught philosophy for many years, and is now a Professor of Philosophy at the University of Stirling. He is the author of Reasons and Experience (Oxford University Press, 1991), Understanding People: Normativity and Rationalizing Explanation (Oxford University Press, 2004), and articles mainly in the philosophy of mind and the theory of knowledge.

Adrian Haddock is a Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Stirling. He has published essays on action, knowledge, and idealism.