|
List of Tables and Figures |
|
|
ix | |
Preface |
|
x | |
Acknowledgements |
|
xiii | |
|
Introducing Rehabilitation: The Theoretical Context |
|
|
1 | (15) |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
The concept of rehabilitation |
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
The human and criminological subject of rehabilitation |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
Rehabilitation and the criminal justice process |
|
|
5 | (3) |
|
Rehabilitation and diversion |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
Rehabilitative punishment |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
Rehabilitation beyond punishment |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
Theoretical justifications for rehabilitation |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
Rehabilitation and its critics |
|
|
10 | (3) |
|
Rehabilitative punishment and questions of justice |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
Suggested further reading |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
Rehabilitation in an Historical Context |
|
|
16 | (18) |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
|
16 | (4) |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
The early twentieth century: rising aspirations |
|
|
20 | (6) |
|
|
21 | (2) |
|
Rehabilitation in the community |
|
|
23 | (3) |
|
The late twentieth century: falling aspirations |
|
|
26 | (6) |
|
|
28 | (2) |
|
|
30 | (2) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
Suggested further reading |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
Delivering Rehabilitation: Custodial and Community Contexts |
|
|
34 | (21) |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
Rehabilitation in the context of prison |
|
|
34 | (8) |
|
|
34 | (3) |
|
Rehabilitative work in prison |
|
|
37 | (5) |
|
Rehabilitation in the context of community penalties |
|
|
42 | (5) |
|
Reconfiguring probation from the 1970s |
|
|
42 | (3) |
|
Rehabilitation in the context of `corrections' |
|
|
45 | (2) |
|
Assessing the potential for rehabilitation |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
Rehabilitation in the context of the non-statutory sector |
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
Rehabilitation in the context of therapeutic communities |
|
|
49 | (3) |
|
|
49 | (2) |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
Suggested further reading |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
|
55 | (20) |
|
Introduction: defining evaluation |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
The experimental model of evaluation |
|
|
56 | (6) |
|
Evaluating programmes for offenders |
|
|
62 | (4) |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
Programme implementation and integrity |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
The role of evaluation in rehabilitation |
|
|
66 | (7) |
|
|
67 | (6) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
Suggested further reading |
|
|
73 | (2) |
|
Reviving Rehabilitation: The `What Works?' Movement |
|
|
75 | (14) |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
The roots of `What Works?' |
|
|
75 | (3) |
|
The mid-1990s: The `principles of effective practice' |
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
New Labour and the `Effective Practice Initiative' |
|
|
80 | (2) |
|
The Crime Reduction Programme `Pathfinders' |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
Doubts about the `What Works?' initiative |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
High hopes ... or unrealistic expectations? |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
Conclusion: putting `What Works?' in context |
|
|
86 | (2) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
Suggested further reading |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
Assessing Offenders: Risks, Needs, Responsivity and Strengths |
|
|
89 | (16) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
|
90 | (3) |
|
Predicting recidivism: actuarial risk assessment |
|
|
91 | (2) |
|
|
93 | (6) |
|
Risk/needs assessment instruments |
|
|
94 | (5) |
|
|
99 | (3) |
|
Prochaska and DiClemente's `cycle of change' |
|
|
100 | (2) |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
Suggested further reading |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
Offending Behaviour Programmes |
|
|
105 | (19) |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
|
106 | (2) |
|
Cognitive-behavioural theory and offending behaviour |
|
|
108 | (3) |
|
General offending behaviour programmes |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
Evaluations of general offending behaviour programmes |
|
|
112 | (7) |
|
Evaluating prison-based programmes |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
Evaluating community-based programmes |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
|
115 | (4) |
|
Offending behaviour programmes in context |
|
|
119 | (3) |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
Suggested further reading |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
|
124 | (16) |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
What is social rehabilitation? |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
|
125 | (9) |
|
|
125 | (3) |
|
|
128 | (3) |
|
|
131 | (2) |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
|
134 | (2) |
|
The responses: social rehabilitation and social policy |
|
|
136 | (2) |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
Suggested further reading |
|
|
138 | (2) |
|
Emerging Approaches: Rehabilitation and the Relational Context |
|
|
140 | (20) |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
The supervisory relationship: a therapeutic alliance? |
|
|
141 | (4) |
|
The importance of quality and consistency |
|
|
142 | (2) |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
Mentoring: advise, assist and befriend? |
|
|
145 | (2) |
|
`Therapeutic jurisprudence': rethinking the role of the criminal courts |
|
|
147 | (4) |
|
|
148 | (2) |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
Restorative justice approaches: offenders, victims and communities |
|
|
151 | (4) |
|
Braithwaite's theory of reintegrative shaming |
|
|
152 | (2) |
|
Developing social capital |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
Circles of support and accountability: reintegrating the `worst of the worst'? |
|
|
155 | (2) |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
Suggested further reading |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
Conclusion: Rehabilitation in the Twenty-First Century |
|
|
160 | (4) |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
Suggested further reading |
|
|
163 | (1) |
References |
|
164 | (19) |
Index |
|
183 | |