List of Figures, Tables, Case Examples, and Case Studies |
|
xv | |
About the Authors |
|
xvii | |
Foreword |
|
xix | |
Preface and Acknowledgments |
|
xxi | |
General Introduction - Crisis communication as a field of research and practice |
|
1 | (14) |
|
The institutionalization of crisis management and crisis communication |
|
|
2 | (6) |
|
As an organizational practice |
|
|
2 | (5) |
|
Box 1 Professional associations |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
As an academic discipline S |
|
|
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
|
10 | (3) |
|
What is an organizational crisis? |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
Crisis management and crisis communication - one or two disciplines? |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (2) |
Part 1 Dimensions of Organizational Crises, Crisis Management, and Crisis Communication |
|
15 | (122) |
|
1 Living in a Crisis Society |
|
|
17 | (17) |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
Signs of a crisis society |
|
|
17 | (3) |
|
Case example 1.1 The MS Estonia disaster as a social icon |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
|
20 | (3) |
|
The techno-scientific approach |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
The psychological approach |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
The organizational approach |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
The politological approach |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
The anthropological approach |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
The sociological approach |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
Ulrich Beck and the risk society |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
Classical and reflexive modernization |
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
Case example 1.2 The swine flu pandemic and the risk society |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
Michael Power and the risk organization |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
Reactions to the risk society |
|
|
29 | (3) |
|
Crisis management and crisis communication in private and public organizations |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
Crises as a field of research |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
Beyond the risk society? Criticisms and elaborations |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
2 What Is a Crisis? Definitions and Typologies |
|
|
34 | (18) |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
|
35 | (3) |
|
Box 2.1 What is a definition? |
|
|
35 | (2) |
|
Box 2.2 Crisis perception |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
|
38 | (3) |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
The crisis after the crisis |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
|
41 | (3) |
|
Case example 2.1 Lists and clusters of crisis types in crisis management plans |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
Box 2.3 What is a typology? |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
The standard crisis portfolio model |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
The extended crisis portfolio model |
|
|
46 | (5) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
Case study 2.1 The crisis portfolio model of FrieslandCampina |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
3 Crisis Management (I): General Perspectives - From Anticipation to Resilience |
|
|
52 | (17) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
What is crisis management? |
|
|
53 | (2) |
|
Box 3.1 Crisis management or crisis leadership? |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
General perspectives on crisis management |
|
|
55 | (8) |
|
The tactical, reactive, and event-oriented perspective |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
The strategic, proactive, and process-oriented perspective |
|
|
57 | (3) |
|
Box 3.2 Image, reputation, status, and legitimacy |
|
|
58 | (2) |
|
New trends in crisis management |
|
|
60 | (3) |
|
Box 3.3 Mindful crisis management |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
The debate on anticipation vs. resilience |
|
|
63 | (4) |
|
Organizational improvisation |
|
|
64 | (2) |
|
Case study 3.1 DEMA's comprehensive preparedness planning |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
4 Crisis Management (II): Staged Approaches - Before, During, and After Crisis |
|
|
69 | (19) |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
|
71 | (9) |
|
Box 4.1 Ten principles of signal detection |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
From prevention to preparation |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
Crisis management team (CMT) |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
Crisis management plan (CMP) |
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
|
80 | (3) |
|
Decision making in crisis situations |
|
|
80 | (2) |
|
Crisis communication plan |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
|
83 | (2) |
|
Evaluation of the crisis management process |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
Criticisms of staged approaches |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
5 Crisis Communication (I): Rhetorical and Text-oriented Approaches |
|
|
88 | (18) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
What is crisis communication? |
|
|
89 | (3) |
|
Box 5.1 Anti-handbook of media failure |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
Crisis communication research: an overview |
|
|
92 | (2) |
|
Box 5.2 What is (a) theory? |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
The rhetorical and text-oriented research tradition |
|
|
94 | (11) |
|
Image repair theory (IRT) |
|
|
95 | (5) |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
Theory (1): Image repair theory |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
Theory (2): Persuasive attacks |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
Further developments and criticisms |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
Terminological control theory (TCT) |
|
|
100 | (7) |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
Theory (1): Terminological control theory |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
Theory (2): Apologetic ethics |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
Further developments and criticisms |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
6 Crisis Communication (II): Strategic and Context-oriented Approaches |
|
|
106 | (15) |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
The strategic and context-oriented research tradition |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
Box 6.1 Methodological controversies |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
Situational crisis communication theory (SCCT) |
|
|
108 | (4) |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
Theory: Situational crisis communication theory |
|
|
110 | (2) |
|
Further developments and criticisms |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
|
112 | (12) |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
Box 6.2 Best practices in crisis communication |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
Theory (1): Contingency theory |
|
|
114 | (2) |
|
Theory (2): The factor-position-strategy model |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
Further developments and criticisms |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
Case study 6.1 Scandinavian Airlines and the Dash 8 Q400 crisis (2007) |
|
|
117 | (2) |
|
Alternative theories and emerging research themes |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
7 Crisis Communication Across Cultures |
|
|
121 | (16) |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
|
121 | (2) |
|
Box 7.1 Host crisis versus global crisis |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
Approaches to the study of culture |
|
|
124 | (3) |
|
The functionalist approach |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
Applying the functionalist approach: the Coca-Cola crisis of 1999 |
|
|
124 | (2) |
|
Box 7.2 Transboundary crises |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
The interpretive or symbolic approach |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
Applying the interpretive or symbolic approach: the Coca-Cola crisis of 1999 |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
Culture, crisis management, and crisis communication |
|
|
127 | (8) |
|
National culture, crisis management, and crisis communication |
|
|
128 | (4) |
|
Box 7.3 How do communication professionals handle the cultural aspects of crises? |
|
|
129 | (2) |
|
Box 7.4 Challenges to intercultural crisis management and crisis communication |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
Organizational culture, crisis management and crisis communication |
|
|
132 | (9) |
|
Case study 7.1 The giraffe Marius and Copenhagen Zoo |
|
|
133 | (2) |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
|
136 | (1) |
Part 2 Inside the Rhetorical Arena |
|
137 | (85) |
|
8 The Rhetorical Arena: A New Theoretical Framework |
|
|
139 | (20) |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
Evaluation of previous crisis communication research |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
Rhetorical arena theory: developing a multivocal approach |
|
|
141 | (3) |
|
What rhetorical arena theory is not |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
What rhetorical arena theory is |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
Box 8.1 An approach to voices - power or complexity? |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
|
144 | (4) |
|
A social science approach to complexity |
|
|
144 | (2) |
|
Box 8.2 Characteristics of complex systems |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
|
148 | (10) |
|
The macro component: patterns of interaction |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
The micro component: parameters of mediation |
|
|
149 | (6) |
|
|
150 | (2) |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
Case example 8.1 Tiger Woods' apology |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
Case study 8.1 Volkswagen and the Dieselgate scandal |
|
|
155 | (3) |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
9 Consumers and Citizens: Emotions and Social Media |
|
|
159 | (18) |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
Consumers as citizens/citizens as consumers? |
|
|
160 | (4) |
|
Case example 9.1 Citizens, activists, and hostage crisis |
|
|
162 | (2) |
|
Do I like this organization? A theory of social approval |
|
|
164 | (2) |
|
Case example 9.2 Jensen's Steakhouse vs. Jensen's Seafood restaurant: From fast food to slow thinking |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
|
167 | (2) |
|
Negative emotions and voices |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
Positive emotions and voices |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
Emotional voices of the organization |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
Social media and crisis communication |
|
|
169 | (4) |
|
Box 9.1 Online firestorms |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
Types of social media crises |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
Social-mediated crisis communication |
|
|
171 | (2) |
|
Patterns of interactions in the rhetorical arena |
|
|
173 | (2) |
|
Case study 9.1 Emotional stakeholders and Telenor's customer complaints crisis on Facebook |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
10 News Media: Mediatization and Crisis Journalism |
|
|
177 | (15) |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
|
177 | (2) |
|
Box 10.1 The life cycle of a disaster: a field guide for journalists |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
A theory of mediatization |
|
|
179 | (7) |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
|
180 | (2) |
|
Box 10.2 Gatekeeping, news values, and focusing events |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
Mediatization of organizations |
|
|
182 | (2) |
|
|
184 | (2) |
|
Box 10.3 Media storm or media hype |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
|
186 | (5) |
|
|
187 | (2) |
|
The news media as a stage for crisis exploitation strategies |
|
|
189 | (6) |
|
Case study 10.1 Dare you eat your own product? Crisis entertainment on television |
|
|
189 | (2) |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
11 Intermediaries: Trade Associations |
|
|
192 | (14) |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
A theory of intermediaries |
|
|
193 | (2) |
|
Box 11.1 The benefits of trade associations |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
|
195 | (10) |
|
Case example 11.1 Tesla Denmark strikes back- supported by a trade association |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
Collective reputation management |
|
|
198 | (15) |
|
The corporate level of reputation |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
The industry level of reputation |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
The trade association level of reputation |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
Case study 11.1 The Bestseller multi-crisis |
|
|
201 | (4) |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
12 Managers and Employees: Inside the Organization |
|
|
206 | (16) |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
Defining the internal voices of an organization |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
Integrative framework for the study of internal crisis communication |
|
|
208 | (2) |
|
How internal is internal? |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
|
211 | (2) |
|
Box 12.1 Crisis communication and strategic human resource development |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
Internal crisis management and crisis communication |
|
|
213 | (4) |
|
How do employees react in crisis situations? |
|
|
213 | (2) |
|
Box 12.2 Implicit theories about managers and employees in crisis situations |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
How do private and public organizations practise internal crisis management and crisis communication? |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
Employees as active crisis communicators |
|
|
217 | (3) |
|
Case study 12.1 Odense Waste Management Company - When whistleblowing is the problem, not the solution |
|
|
219 | (1) |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
|
221 | (1) |
Epilogue The Future of Organizational Crisis Communication: Agendas for Research, Education, and Practice |
|
222 | (6) |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
Thought leadership in crisis communication |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
An agenda for researchers |
|
|
223 | (2) |
|
An agenda for educators and students |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
An agenda for practitioners |
|
|
226 | (2) |
References |
|
228 | (18) |
Index |
|
246 | |