Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

El. knyga: Patent Law Injunctions

  • Formatas: 280 pages
  • Išleidimo metai: 27-Nov-2018
  • Leidėjas: Kluwer Law International
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9789041194589
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: 280 pages
  • Išleidimo metai: 27-Nov-2018
  • Leidėjas: Kluwer Law International
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9789041194589
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:

DRM apribojimai

  • Kopijuoti:

    neleidžiama

  • Spausdinti:

    neleidžiama

  • El. knygos naudojimas:

    Skaitmeninių teisių valdymas (DRM)
    Leidykla pateikė šią knygą šifruota forma, o tai reiškia, kad norint ją atrakinti ir perskaityti reikia įdiegti nemokamą programinę įrangą. Norint skaityti šią el. knygą, turite susikurti Adobe ID . Daugiau informacijos  čia. El. knygą galima atsisiųsti į 6 įrenginius (vienas vartotojas su tuo pačiu Adobe ID).

    Reikalinga programinė įranga
    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą mobiliajame įrenginyje (telefone ar planšetiniame kompiuteryje), turite įdiegti šią nemokamą programėlę: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą asmeniniame arba „Mac“ kompiuteryje, Jums reikalinga  Adobe Digital Editions “ (tai nemokama programa, specialiai sukurta el. knygoms. Tai nėra tas pats, kas „Adobe Reader“, kurią tikriausiai jau turite savo kompiuteryje.)

    Negalite skaityti šios el. knygos naudodami „Amazon Kindle“.

About this book:
Patent Law Injunctions is a comparative work on injunctive relief in patent law in major jurisdictions around the world. It contains an extensive analysis of the United States, the European Union (EU), selected EU Member States (Germany, France, the Netherlands, Belgium, the United Kingdom and Poland), China, India, Japan and South Korea. It covers both preliminary (interim) and permanent injunctions. In numerous jurisdictions, courts have realized that injunctive relief should not be available automatically in case of patent infringement. Particularly in the wake of the US Supreme Court decision in eBay v. MercExchange, it has become clear that granting an injunction may in some cases enable abuse by patent holders in order to obtain royalties exceeding significantly the value of the patent-protected invention or that it may be manifestly against the public interest.

What’s in this book:
Recognizing that patent disputes have become truly global disputes and responding to the growing need to provide a comprehensive and flexible framework for the application of injunctive relief, twelve patent law experts, both academics and well-known practitioners familiar with practice in their particular jurisdictions, offer analyses of such elements of patent law injunctions as the following:

  • access to SEPs;
  • operations of patent assertion entities;
  • trolls and patent privateers;
  • equitable nature of injunctive relief as a source of flexibility;
  • abuse of right and competition law defences to injunctive relief as sources of flexibility;
  • analysis of EU instruments that could be used in the interpretation of Member State implementing laws;
  • conditions for the application of tools such as equity, competition law or general doctrines such as abuse of rights;
  • circumstances when injunctions should be denied to patentees even though a valid patent was infringed;
  • complex products cases where patents protect minor parts of the technologies; and
  • advantages and disadvantages of various approaches to injunctive relief.

A proposal for an optimal model of granting injunctions is also included.

How this will help you:
Given that there is a growing consensus as to the circumstances in which injunctions should be available to the patentees and the circumstances when injunctions should be denied, a comprehensive analysis of the various legal doctrines that justify a more flexible approach towards injunctive relief is warranted. This book will give patent law practitioners and in-house counsel the opportunity to draw from the experience of other jurisdictions where courts faced similar problems. Policymakers, patent office officials, academics and researchers in intellectual property law will also welcome this approach.

Editor v
Contributors vii
Preface xxiii
Part I US Law
1(152)
Chapter 1 Injunctive Relief in US Patent Cases
3(84)
Jorge L. Contreras
§1.01 Equitable Remedies and Injunctive Relief under US Law
3(3)
A Equitable Relief under the Common Law
3(1)
B Merger of Law and Equity
4(1)
C Irreparable Harm and the Grant of Equitable Relief
5(1)
§ 1.02 Permanent Injunctive Relief in US Patent Cases
6(11)
A Before eBay: Presumption of Irreparable Harm
7(1)
B eBay and the Four Factor Test
8(1)
C Determining Irreparable Harm After eBay
9(1)
D Balancing Hardships and Equities
10(1)
E The Public Interest Factor After eBay
11(1)
F Multicomponent Products and Causal Nexus
12(1)
G Empirical Studies of Injunctive Relief
13(1)
H Scope of Injunctions
14(1)
I Compulsory Licensing and Ongoing Royalties After the Denial of Injunctive Relief
15(2)
§1.03 Preliminary Injunctions in Patent Cases
17(70)
A Preliminary Injunction Overview
17(65)
[ 2] Course of PI Infringement Proceedings
82(1)
[ 3] Urgency
83(1)
[ 4] Validity of the Patent
83(1)
[ 5] Weighting of Interests
84(1)
[ 6] Prima Facie Evidence
84(1)
[ 7] Enforcement
85(2)
Chapter 5 Injunctions in French Patent Law Amandine Leonard
87(30)
§5.01 Introduction
87(2)
A Legislative Framework
87(1)
B Competent Court
87(1)
C Patent Litigation in France
88(1)
D Remark on Recent Developments
89(1)
§ 5.02 Injunctive Relief: Conditions and Flexibility
89(7)
A Preliminary Injunctions
89(3)
B Permanent Injunctions
92(3)
C Enforcement Directive and TRIPs Agreement
95(1)
§ 5.03 Exceptional Circumstances
96(4)
A Competition Law
96(2)
B Abuse of Rights
98(1)
C Somewhere Between Competition Law and Abuse of Rights?
99(1)
§ 5.04 Standardization and FRAND
100(8)
A Case Law
101(3)
B FRAND Pledges and Requirement to Act in Good Faith
104(2)
C Royalty Rate and FRAND Terms
106(2)
§ 5.05 Exploring New Territories
108(3)
A On Acquiescence (Tolerance), Legitimate Expectations and Estoppel `a In. francaise'
108(2)
B The Complex Product Issue
110(1)
§ 5.06 US Concerns
111(5)
A The Impact of eBay on Injunctive Relief in France
111(1)
B Patent Trolling Scenarios under French Patent Law
112(4)
§ 5.07 Conclusive Remarks
116(1)
Chapter 6 Patent Injunctions in Dutch Law
117(18)
Matt Heckman
§6.01 Introduction to Dutch Patent Law
117(1)
§ 6.02 General Overview of Remedies and Procedure in Patent Infringement Disputes
118(1)
§6.03 Preliminary (Interim) Injunctions
119(3)
A Patent Validity
120(1)
B Urgency
120(1)
C Likelihood of Infringement
120(1)
D Complexity of the Case
121(1)
E Balance of Interests
121(1)
F Standard of Proof and Other Procedural Requirements
121(1)
G Judicial Discretion
122(1)
§ 6.04 Permanent Injunctions
122(1)
§ 6.05 Cross-Border Injunctions
123(3)
A Roche v. Primus
123(1)
B GAT-LuK
124(1)
C Solvay v. Honeywell
125(1)
§ 6.06 Injunctive Relief for Standard Essential Patents: Analysis of the Relevant Case Law
126(5)
A Philips v. SK Kassetten
126(1)
B LG Electronics v. Sony
127(1)
C Samsung v. Apple
128(3)
D Archos v. Philips
131(1)
§ 6.07 Flexibility and Equitable Concerns in Granting Injunctive Relief
131(4)
A FRAND Licensing
131(2)
B Patent Trolls
133(2)
Chapter 7 Injunctive Relief in Polish Patent Law
135(18)
Rafal Sikorski
Piotr Andrzejewski
Piotr Ruchala
§7.01 Introduction
135(2)
§7.02 Permanent Injunctions and Alternative Measures
137(7)
A Permanent Injunctions
137(3)
B Compensation in Lieu of Injunction (Alternative Measure)
140(4)
§ 7.03 Abuse of Right Doctrines
144(3)
§ 7.04 EU Competition Law/National Competition Law Defense
147(1)
§ 7.05 Enforcement of Permanent Injunctions
148(1)
§ 7.06 Interim (Preliminary, Interlocutory) Injunctions
149(2)
§ 7.07 Conclusions
151(2)
PART III Asia
153(84)
Chapter 8 Injunctive Relief in China's Patent Law
155(24)
Liguo Zhang
§8.01 Introduction
155(3)
A Remedies for Patent Infringement in Chinese Law
156(1)
B Who Awards an Injunction in China: A Court or Administrative Entity
157(1)
[ 1] Judicial Institutions
157(1)
[ 2] Administrative Authority
158(1)
§ 8.02 Preliminary Injunctions and Permanent Injunctions: Procedure and Conditions
158(4)
A Preliminary Injunctions
158(3)
B Permanent Injunction
161(1)
§ 8.03 Defenses Against an Injunction
162(7)
A Public Interest Defense
162(4)
B Good Faith
166(1)
[ 1] Patentee Violating the Principle of Good Faith
166(1)
[ 2] Infringer Using a Patent in Good Faith
166(1)
C Compulsory License
167(1)
[ 1] Procedure to Apply for a Compulsory License in China
168(1)
[ 2] Compulsory License Procedure and Injunction
168(1)
§8.04 Injunctions for SEPs and FRAND Commitments
169(8)
A In re Qualcomm by the NDRC
169(1)
[ 1] Qualcomm's Dominant Position in the Relevant Markets
170(1)
[ 2] Licensing Offers Violating the ALM
171(1)
[ 3] Licensing Offers Violating the AML as a Defense Against an Injunction
172(1)
B Huawei v. InterDigital
172(3)
C Huawei v. Samsung
175(2)
§ 8.05 Conclusions
177(2)
Chapter 9 Patent Injunction Heuristics in India
179(28)
Yogesh Pai
§9.01 Introduction
179(2)
§9.02 Situating Patent Injunctions in India in the Current Debate
181(7)
§9.03 Statutory Foundations of Patent Injunctions in India
188(3)
§9.04 Standards for Granting Patent Injunctions
191(13)
A Interim Injunctions
191(1)
[ 1] Prima Facie Case
192(2)
[ 2] Irreparable Injury
194(2)
[ 3] Balance of Convenience and Public Interest
196(3)
B Ex Parte Injunctions
199(2)
C Quia-Timet Injunctions
201(2)
D Permanent Injunctions
203(1)
§ 9.05 Conclusion
204(3)
Chapter 10 Patent Injunctions in South Korea
207(16)
Yoonhee Kim
Hui Jin Yang
§10.01 Injunctive Relief under Korean Law
207(3)
A Preliminary Injunction
207(2)
B Permanent Injunction
209(1)
§ 10.02 Abuse of Rights Defenses to Claims for Injunctive Relief
210(2)
A Civil Law
210(1)
B Patent Law
210(1)
C Competition Law
211(1)
§ 10.03 Samsung v. Apple: The Korean Court's Perspectives on SEP Injunctions
212(6)
A FRAND Commitments from a Contract Law Perspective
212(1)
B The Duty to Negotiate in Good Faith and Abuse of Rights Defenses
213(2)
C FRAND Negotiation under Scrutiny
215(3)
§ 10.04 The IPR Guidelines: The KFTC's Perspectives on SEP Injunctions
218(3)
A SEP Injunctions and FRAND Negotiation
218(1)
B NPEs and Jurisdictional Reach
219(1)
C The 2016 Amendment: Distinctions Clarified Between SEPs and "De Facto" SEPs
220(1)
§10.05 Conclusion
221(2)
Chapter 11 Injunctive Relief in Japan
223(14)
Christoph Rademacher
§11.01 Legal Framework and Court System
223(1)
§11.02 Remedies
224(5)
A Permanent Injunctive Relief
224(1)
[ 1] Requirements
224(1)
[ 2] Scope
225(1)
[ 3] Compulsory Enforcement of Injunctions
226(1)
B Preliminary Injunction
226(1)
[ 1] Requirements
226(2)
[ 2] Procedural Overview
228(1)
[ 3] Damages for Wrongful Injunctive Relief
229(1)
§11.03 Defences Against Injunctive Relief
229(6)
A Compulsory License
229(1)
[ 1] Lack of Practice
230(1)
[ 2] Dependent License
231(1)
[ 3] Public Interest License
231(1)
B Abuse of Rights Defence
232(3)
§ 11.04 Concluding Thoughts
235(2)
Part IV Conclusions
237
Chapter 12 Between Automatism and Flexibility: Injunctions in Twenty-First Century Patent Law
239
Rafat Sikorski
§12.01 Patent Exclusivity and Injunctive Relief: Two Sides of the Same Coin
239(3)
§12.02 Cases for Flexibility
242(5)
A Standardization and Standard Essential Patents
243(2)
B NPEs, PAEs, Patent Trolls and Privateering
245(1)
C Complex Products
246(1)
D Public Interest
247(1)
§ 12.03 Legal Framework
247
A International Law Framework - The TRIPS Agreement
247(1)
B Permanent Injunctions at National Level
248(1)
C Preliminary Injunctions
249