Editor |
|
v | |
Contributors |
|
vii | |
Preface |
|
xxiii | |
|
|
1 | (152) |
|
Chapter 1 Injunctive Relief in US Patent Cases |
|
|
3 | (84) |
|
|
§1.01 Equitable Remedies and Injunctive Relief under US Law |
|
|
3 | (3) |
|
A Equitable Relief under the Common Law |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
B Merger of Law and Equity |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
C Irreparable Harm and the Grant of Equitable Relief |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
§ 1.02 Permanent Injunctive Relief in US Patent Cases |
|
|
6 | (11) |
|
A Before eBay: Presumption of Irreparable Harm |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
B eBay and the Four Factor Test |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
C Determining Irreparable Harm After eBay |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
D Balancing Hardships and Equities |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
E The Public Interest Factor After eBay |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
F Multicomponent Products and Causal Nexus |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
G Empirical Studies of Injunctive Relief |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
I Compulsory Licensing and Ongoing Royalties After the Denial of Injunctive Relief |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
§1.03 Preliminary Injunctions in Patent Cases |
|
|
17 | (70) |
|
A Preliminary Injunction Overview |
|
|
17 | (65) |
|
[ 2] Course of PI Infringement Proceedings |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
[ 4] Validity of the Patent |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
[ 5] Weighting of Interests |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
[ 6] Prima Facie Evidence |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (2) |
|
Chapter 5 Injunctions in French Patent Law Amandine Leonard |
|
|
87 | (30) |
|
|
87 | (2) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
C Patent Litigation in France |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
D Remark on Recent Developments |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
§ 5.02 Injunctive Relief: Conditions and Flexibility |
|
|
89 | (7) |
|
A Preliminary Injunctions |
|
|
89 | (3) |
|
|
92 | (3) |
|
C Enforcement Directive and TRIPs Agreement |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
§ 5.03 Exceptional Circumstances |
|
|
96 | (4) |
|
|
96 | (2) |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
C Somewhere Between Competition Law and Abuse of Rights? |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
§ 5.04 Standardization and FRAND |
|
|
100 | (8) |
|
|
101 | (3) |
|
B FRAND Pledges and Requirement to Act in Good Faith |
|
|
104 | (2) |
|
C Royalty Rate and FRAND Terms |
|
|
106 | (2) |
|
§ 5.05 Exploring New Territories |
|
|
108 | (3) |
|
A On Acquiescence (Tolerance), Legitimate Expectations and Estoppel `a In. francaise' |
|
|
108 | (2) |
|
B The Complex Product Issue |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
|
111 | (5) |
|
A The Impact of eBay on Injunctive Relief in France |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
B Patent Trolling Scenarios under French Patent Law |
|
|
112 | (4) |
|
§ 5.07 Conclusive Remarks |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
Chapter 6 Patent Injunctions in Dutch Law |
|
|
117 | (18) |
|
|
§6.01 Introduction to Dutch Patent Law |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
§ 6.02 General Overview of Remedies and Procedure in Patent Infringement Disputes |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
§6.03 Preliminary (Interim) Injunctions |
|
|
119 | (3) |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
C Likelihood of Infringement |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
F Standard of Proof and Other Procedural Requirements |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
§ 6.04 Permanent Injunctions |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
§ 6.05 Cross-Border Injunctions |
|
|
123 | (3) |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
§ 6.06 Injunctive Relief for Standard Essential Patents: Analysis of the Relevant Case Law |
|
|
126 | (5) |
|
A Philips v. SK Kassetten |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
|
128 | (3) |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
§ 6.07 Flexibility and Equitable Concerns in Granting Injunctive Relief |
|
|
131 | (4) |
|
|
131 | (2) |
|
|
133 | (2) |
|
Chapter 7 Injunctive Relief in Polish Patent Law |
|
|
135 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
135 | (2) |
|
§7.02 Permanent Injunctions and Alternative Measures |
|
|
137 | (7) |
|
|
137 | (3) |
|
B Compensation in Lieu of Injunction (Alternative Measure) |
|
|
140 | (4) |
|
§ 7.03 Abuse of Right Doctrines |
|
|
144 | (3) |
|
§ 7.04 EU Competition Law/National Competition Law Defense |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
§ 7.05 Enforcement of Permanent Injunctions |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
§ 7.06 Interim (Preliminary, Interlocutory) Injunctions |
|
|
149 | (2) |
|
|
151 | (2) |
|
|
153 | (84) |
|
Chapter 8 Injunctive Relief in China's Patent Law |
|
|
155 | (24) |
|
|
|
155 | (3) |
|
A Remedies for Patent Infringement in Chinese Law |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
B Who Awards an Injunction in China: A Court or Administrative Entity |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
[ 1] Judicial Institutions |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
[ 2] Administrative Authority |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
§ 8.02 Preliminary Injunctions and Permanent Injunctions: Procedure and Conditions |
|
|
158 | (4) |
|
A Preliminary Injunctions |
|
|
158 | (3) |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
§ 8.03 Defenses Against an Injunction |
|
|
162 | (7) |
|
A Public Interest Defense |
|
|
162 | (4) |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
[ 1] Patentee Violating the Principle of Good Faith |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
[ 2] Infringer Using a Patent in Good Faith |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
[ 1] Procedure to Apply for a Compulsory License in China |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
[ 2] Compulsory License Procedure and Injunction |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
§8.04 Injunctions for SEPs and FRAND Commitments |
|
|
169 | (8) |
|
A In re Qualcomm by the NDRC |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
[ 1] Qualcomm's Dominant Position in the Relevant Markets |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
[ 2] Licensing Offers Violating the ALM |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
[ 3] Licensing Offers Violating the AML as a Defense Against an Injunction |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
|
172 | (3) |
|
|
175 | (2) |
|
|
177 | (2) |
|
Chapter 9 Patent Injunction Heuristics in India |
|
|
179 | (28) |
|
|
|
179 | (2) |
|
§9.02 Situating Patent Injunctions in India in the Current Debate |
|
|
181 | (7) |
|
§9.03 Statutory Foundations of Patent Injunctions in India |
|
|
188 | (3) |
|
§9.04 Standards for Granting Patent Injunctions |
|
|
191 | (13) |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
|
192 | (2) |
|
|
194 | (2) |
|
[ 3] Balance of Convenience and Public Interest |
|
|
196 | (3) |
|
|
199 | (2) |
|
|
201 | (2) |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
|
204 | (3) |
|
Chapter 10 Patent Injunctions in South Korea |
|
|
207 | (16) |
|
|
|
§10.01 Injunctive Relief under Korean Law |
|
|
207 | (3) |
|
|
207 | (2) |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
§ 10.02 Abuse of Rights Defenses to Claims for Injunctive Relief |
|
|
210 | (2) |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
§ 10.03 Samsung v. Apple: The Korean Court's Perspectives on SEP Injunctions |
|
|
212 | (6) |
|
A FRAND Commitments from a Contract Law Perspective |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
B The Duty to Negotiate in Good Faith and Abuse of Rights Defenses |
|
|
213 | (2) |
|
C FRAND Negotiation under Scrutiny |
|
|
215 | (3) |
|
§ 10.04 The IPR Guidelines: The KFTC's Perspectives on SEP Injunctions |
|
|
218 | (3) |
|
A SEP Injunctions and FRAND Negotiation |
|
|
218 | (1) |
|
B NPEs and Jurisdictional Reach |
|
|
219 | (1) |
|
C The 2016 Amendment: Distinctions Clarified Between SEPs and "De Facto" SEPs |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
|
221 | (2) |
|
Chapter 11 Injunctive Relief in Japan |
|
|
223 | (14) |
|
|
§11.01 Legal Framework and Court System |
|
|
223 | (1) |
|
|
224 | (5) |
|
A Permanent Injunctive Relief |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
[ 3] Compulsory Enforcement of Injunctions |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
|
226 | (2) |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
[ 3] Damages for Wrongful Injunctive Relief |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
§11.03 Defences Against Injunctive Relief |
|
|
229 | (6) |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
[ 3] Public Interest License |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
B Abuse of Rights Defence |
|
|
232 | (3) |
|
§ 11.04 Concluding Thoughts |
|
|
235 | (2) |
|
|
237 | |
|
Chapter 12 Between Automatism and Flexibility: Injunctions in Twenty-First Century Patent Law |
|
|
239 | |
|
|
§12.01 Patent Exclusivity and Injunctive Relief: Two Sides of the Same Coin |
|
|
239 | (3) |
|
§12.02 Cases for Flexibility |
|
|
242 | (5) |
|
A Standardization and Standard Essential Patents |
|
|
243 | (2) |
|
B NPEs, PAEs, Patent Trolls and Privateering |
|
|
245 | (1) |
|
|
246 | (1) |
|
|
247 | (1) |
|
|
247 | |
|
A International Law Framework - The TRIPS Agreement |
|
|
247 | (1) |
|
B Permanent Injunctions at National Level |
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
C Preliminary Injunctions |
|
|
249 | |