"The tenth volume in the prestigious William and Katherine Devers Series in Dante Studies consists of a collection of essays devoted to Dante and Petrarch by the most distinguished scholars in the field.... Altogether the nine essays extensively explore the relationship between the two Trecento Italian crowns (Boccaccio's writings frequently come under scrutiny as well) and the implication of the presence (hidden or evident) of Dante in Petrarch. This collection clearly shows that many new aspects can be detected in this much-studied and complex relationship." Modern Philology
"This most valuable volume contains nine essays penned by some of the most eminent scholars of Dante and Petrarch, as well as of Boccaccio. With this volume, the authors have enhanced the level of scholarship in the field. " Sixteenth Century Journal
"This volume focuses on the nature of the relationship between two foundational figures of Italian literature, focusing on ideological, historiographical, and rhetorical terms. The contributors . . . are distinguished Dante and Petrarch scholars and make this a volume of immense value." Comitatus
"This well-organized and beautifully written book is a rich treasure-trove of carefully traced evidence ranging across Petrarch's opus, offering intriguing new perspectives on the close yet fraught relationship between two intellectual giants." Parergon
"Bringing together leading scholars of medieval studies, this highly readable and engaging volume presents original contributions. . . . Through a variety of methodological tools that bridge the study authorship, textuality, and linguistic and cultural politics, the essays each examine a particular strategy by which Petrarch sought to limit Dante's authority, especially in vernacular terms and with respect to the metaphysical and religious claims of the Commedia. The question of exactly where the dialogue between Dante and Petrarch begins and ends remains open, but it is that open-endedness which the volume promotes as its greatest critical strength." Medium Aevum
"This magisterial volume . . . brings together significant new contributions to the debate by a number of major North American scholars of early Italian literature. It is the product of 'lungo studio' and 'grande amore'both the love (and hate) that made Petrarch probe Dante's volume, despite his protestations to the contrary, and that drove the authors of the present tome. It is a big, ambitious book with nine essays that average over forty pages and are consistently strong and surprisingly varied . . . the volume . . . will doubtlessly be canonized by manifold articles and exam lists as the place to begin any discussion of the relations between Florence's first two crowns." Italica
"This outstanding collection of nine essays by leading Anglo-American scholars provides a rigorous re-examination of the relationship between these two towering cultural figures, focusing on three components ('Anti-Dantism,' 'Metaphysics,' and 'Tradition') of what is viewed as their substantive ideological opposition. . . . It is rare for a multi-authored volume of this kind to display not only such sustained excellence, but also such unflinching critical focus. It constitutes, without question, the most important existing contribution to our understanding of the two poets' relationship, and its authoritative and meticulously researched essays will deservedly remain fundamental points of reference for a long time to come." Modern Language Review
"Although the conjunction in the book's title suggests a yoking together of the first two of the three crowns of Italian literature, the essays in the volume generally argue for their differentiation. . . . The volume as a whole grounds the reader in critical history even as it moves in 'counterpoint' with the respect both to prior critical consensus and to each other. . . . In sum, this is a superb volume, offering truly new work on veritable old masters." Renaissance Quarterly
"A collection of sparkling essays exploring Petrarch's efforts to conceal his enormous debt to Dante while seeking to replace Dante's authority with his own. I found it hard to stop reading." Ronald Witt, Duke University
