Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

El. knyga: Preliminary Injunctions: Germany, England/Wales, Italy and France

  • Formatas: 338 pages
  • Išleidimo metai: 08-Oct-2015
  • Leidėjas: Kluwer Law International
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9789041158505
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: 338 pages
  • Išleidimo metai: 08-Oct-2015
  • Leidėjas: Kluwer Law International
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9789041158505
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:

DRM apribojimai

  • Kopijuoti:

    neleidžiama

  • Spausdinti:

    neleidžiama

  • El. knygos naudojimas:

    Skaitmeninių teisių valdymas (DRM)
    Leidykla pateikė šią knygą šifruota forma, o tai reiškia, kad norint ją atrakinti ir perskaityti reikia įdiegti nemokamą programinę įrangą. Norint skaityti šią el. knygą, turite susikurti Adobe ID . Daugiau informacijos  čia. El. knygą galima atsisiųsti į 6 įrenginius (vienas vartotojas su tuo pačiu Adobe ID).

    Reikalinga programinė įranga
    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą mobiliajame įrenginyje (telefone ar planšetiniame kompiuteryje), turite įdiegti šią nemokamą programėlę: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą asmeniniame arba „Mac“ kompiuteryje, Jums reikalinga  Adobe Digital Editions “ (tai nemokama programa, specialiai sukurta el. knygoms. Tai nėra tas pats, kas „Adobe Reader“, kurią tikriausiai jau turite savo kompiuteryje.)

    Negalite skaityti šios el. knygos naudodami „Amazon Kindle“.

Every legal system, at the outset of court proceedings, has rules aimed at safeguarding parties' interests during the time needed to obtain a judgment on the merits. However, as the European Commission put the case in a 1997 communication, 'a comparative survey of national legislation reveals that there are virtually no definitions of provisional/protective measures and that the legal situations vary widely. The only convergence that can be ascertained is between the function of such measures.'

Recognizing that after almost twenty years the issues noted by the Commission have not found a satisfactory solution, here at last is a book that collects and compares the ideas behind the 'preliminary injunction' (an expression the authors use as a general term for a great variety of provisional and precautionary measures) with an eye to defining and organizing this small but very important aspect of the law. Although the analysis touches on relevant measures from many countries, the authors focus on the national legislation in four EU Member States – England, France, Germany, and Italy – to highlight the nature of the differences these kinds of measures entail. They compare and contrast such aspects as the following:

  • – differences in civil procedure;
  • - the types of measures that may be taken;
  • - the terms on which preliminary injunctions, which are normally directly enforceable, may be ordered by a court;
  • - the kind of assets that may be affected;
  • - the relationship between proceedings in an interlocutory action and proceedings on the substance;
  • - necessity of credible evidence that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result if no preliminary injunction is granted; and
  • - the role of protective measures in summary proceedings.

The study also describes and examines the recent European order for payment (EC Regulation No. 1896/2006), the most significant existing transnational instrument aimed at granting preliminary protection of creditors' rights.

This incomparable book represents a major contribution to a growing debate, particularly in Europe, on ways and means of securing equivalent protection for all litigants. Given the variety of legal systems and of measures available, the debate will have to focus on the functions served by provisional/protective measures, the minimum conditions to be satisfied, the adversary procedure requirement, the enforceability of the measures, and possible redress procedures. There is no more thorough and reliable resource available to clarify these issues for practitioners and interested policymakers everywhere.

About the Authors vii
Foreword xiii
List of Abbreviations
xv
Part I Germany and England/Wales
1(146)
Introduction to the First Part
3(4)
Torsten Frank Koschinka
Chapter 1 Germany
7(98)
Torsten Frank Koschinka
§1.01 Terminology, Typology and Overview
7(3)
§1.02 The Different Types of Preliminary Injunctions in Detail
10(95)
[ A] The `Arrest'
10(1)
[ 1] Relevant Provisions
10(9)
[ 2] `Dinglicher Arrest'
19(1)
[ a] `Arrestanspruch'
19(3)
[ b] `Arrestgrund'
22(16)
[ 3] `Personlicher Arrest'
38(2)
[ a] `Arrestanspruch'
40(1)
[ b] `Arrestgrund'
41(2)
[ 4] Procedural Questions
43(1)
[ a] Jurisdiction
43(1)
[ b] Formal Requirements of the Application
44(2)
[ c] Burden and Degree (Standard) of Proof: fumus boni iuris et periculi in mora
46(18)
[ d] The Decision
64(1)
[ e] Remedies
65(5)
[ 5] Obligation to Pay Damages
70(1)
[ B] The `einstweiligen Verfiigungen'
71(34)
Chapter 2 England and Wales
105(42)
Torsten Frank Koschinka
§2.0 1 Overview
105(4)
§2.02 General Remarks on Preliminary (Interim/Interlocutory) Injunctions
109(24)
[ A] Definition and Legal Basis
109(2)
[ B] Jurisdiction
111(1)
[ C] Interim Injunctions before the Issuance of a Claim Form
112(1)
[ D] Parties
113(1)
[ E] Substantive Claim
114(1)
[ F] Burden and Standard (Degree) of Proof
115(1)
[ 1] `A Prima Facie Case'? -- Necessity of a `Fumus Boni Iuris'?
116(1)
[ 2] A Serious Question to Be Tried
117(2)
[ 3] Inadequacy of Damages
119(2)
[ 4] Balance of Convenience
121(1)
[ 5] Status Quo
122(1)
[ 6] Exceptional Cases
123(1)
[ 7] Means of Evidence
124(2)
[ G] Ex Parte Preliminary Injunctions
126(3)
[ H] The Decision/Remedies
129(1)
[ I] Execution
130(1)
[ J] Obligation to Pay Damages/Inquiry as to Damages
131(2)
§2.03 Freezing (Mareva) Injunctions
133(6)
[ A] The Freezing Injunction in General
133(1)
[ B] A Cause of Action Justiciable in England/Wales
134(1)
[ C] A Good Arguable Case on the Merits
135(1)
[ D] Assets within the Jurisdiction
136(1)
[ E] A Real Risk of Removal or Disposal of Assets
137(1)
[ F] Undertakings as to Damages
138(1)
[ G] The Decision/Remedies
138(1)
[ H] Ne Exeat Regno
138(1)
§2.04 Interim Possession Order (IPO)
139(1)
§2.05 Search (Anton Piller) Orders
140(7)
Bibliography
144(3)
Part II Italy and France
147(80)
Introduction to the Second Part
149(10)
Piero Leanza
I Summary Proceedings and Interim Measures
149(1)
II Summary Proceedings with No Precautionary Function
149(4)
III The European Order for Payment
153(2)
IV Summary Proceedings with Precautionary Function
155(1)
V The Lack of a Uniform Discipline in Europe
156(3)
Chapter 3 Italy
159(50)
Piero Leanza
§3.01 Historical Precedents
159(2)
§3.02 Precautionary Measures in Italian Law
161(2)
§3.03 The provvedimenti d'urgenza under Article 700 ICPC (Urgent Measures)
163(6)
[ A] Field of Application
164(1)
[ B] Residual Nature
165(1)
[ C] A Typical Nature
165(1)
[ D] Protective Measures (provvedimenti conservativi)
166(1)
[ E] Anticipatory Measures (provvedimenti anticipatori)
166(1)
[ F] Requirements for the Issuance of an Urgent Measure
167(1)
[ 1] The fumus boni iuris
168(1)
[ 2] The periculum in mora
168(1)
§3.04 Asset Related Precautionary Measures: The Sequestro
169(13)
[ A] The sequestro giudiziario (Judicial Sequestration)
169(2)
[ B] The sequestro conservativo (Protective Sequestration)
171(2)
[ 1] Scope
173(1)
[ 2] Object
173(1)
[ 3] The fumus boni iuris
174(1)
[ 4] The periculum in mora
175(1)
[ 5] The Execution
175(1)
[ 6] Reduction and Revocation of the Seizure
176(1)
[ 7] Conversion of Conservatory Sequestration into Attachment
176(1)
[ C] The sequestro liberatorio
176(1)
[ D] Sequestration in Respect of Obligations between Spouses
177(1)
[ E] The Seizure of Sea Ships
178(4)
§3.05 The processo cautelare uniforme (Unified Procedure for Precautionary Measures)
182(15)
[ A] Introduction to the Proceedings
182(2)
[ B] Application Submitted During Pending Proceedings on the Merits
184(1)
[ C] Questions of Competence and Jurisdiction
184(1)
[ D] Collection of Evidence and Decision
185(1)
[ E] Rejection of the Application
186(1)
[ F] The Granting of the Injunction
187(1)
[ G] The `Stability' of the Preliminary Injunction
188(1)
[ H] Inefficacy of Precautionary Measures
189(1)
[ I] Revocation and Modification of the Precautionary Measure
189(3)
[ J] Challenging the Precautionary Measure: The reclamo
192(1)
[ 1] Powers of the Court Deciding on the Complaint
192(1)
[ 2] The Complaint against the Reject Decision and the Ex Parte Relief
193(2)
[ K] The Execution of the Precautionary Measure
195(2)
§3.06 Interim Measures for Preservation of Evidence
197(3)
[ A] Procedure
199(1)
§3.07 Summary Proceedings without Precautionary Function
200(9)
[ A] The decreto ingiuntivo
200(4)
[ 1] Issuance of the Injunction
204(1)
[ 2] The giudizio di opposizione
204(5)
Chapter 4 France
209(18)
Piero Leanza
§4.01 Introduction
209(2)
§4.02 Referes generaux and referes speciaux
211(1)
§4.03 Article 808 FCPC (refere classique)
212(2)
§4.04 Article 809 FCPC (refere de remise in etat, refere provision, injonction de faire)
214(1)
§4.05 Competence
215(1)
§4.06 The Procedure
216(3)
§4.07 The Decision
219(2)
§4.08 The Appeal
221(1)
§4.09 The astreintes
222(1)
§4.10 The ordonnances sur requete
222(3)
§4.11 The refere en la forme
225(2)
Bibliography 227(6)
Appendix 233(66)
Table of Cases 299(8)
Index 307