Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Proof: Uses of Evidence in Law, Politics, and Everything Else [Kietas viršelis]

4.35/5 (60 ratings by Goodreads)
  • Formatas: Hardback, 320 pages, aukštis x plotis x storis: 210x140x28 mm, weight: 499 g
  • Išleidimo metai: 31-May-2022
  • Leidėjas: Harvard University Press
  • ISBN-10: 0674251377
  • ISBN-13: 9780674251373
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: Hardback, 320 pages, aukštis x plotis x storis: 210x140x28 mm, weight: 499 g
  • Išleidimo metai: 31-May-2022
  • Leidėjas: Harvard University Press
  • ISBN-10: 0674251377
  • ISBN-13: 9780674251373
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
"A noticeable shift in focus has occurred in public discourse from What is our best course of action? to What are the true facts of the situation? At the center of these debates are questions on the proper use of evidence, Legal scholar Schauer offers clarity based on how legal systems grapple with these questions-and by drawing insights from psychology, philosophy, economics, history, and decision theory"--

How do we know what we think we know? The answer is evidence, but evidence is no simple thing. What counts as evidence in a scientific context or private dispute may not stand up in court. Frederick Schauer combines perspectives from law, statistics, psychology, and philosophy to assess the nature of evidence in the era of “fake news.”

In a world awash in “fake news,” where public figures make unfounded assertions as a matter of course, a preeminent legal theorist ranges across the courtroom, the scientific laboratory, and the insights of philosophers to explore the nature of evidence and show how it is credibly established.

In the age of fake news, trust and truth are hard to come by. Blatantly and shamelessly, public figures deceive us by abusing what sounds like evidence. Preeminent legal theorist Frederick Schauer proposes correctives, drawing on centuries of inquiry into the nature of evidence.

Evidence is the basis of how we know what we think we know, but evidence is no simple thing. Evidence that counts in, say, the policymaking context is different from evidence that stands up in court. Law, science, historical scholarship, public and private decisionmaking—all rely on different standards of evidence. Exploring diverse terrain including vaccine and food safety, election-fraud claims, the January 2021 events at the US Capitol, the reliability of experts and eyewitnesses, climate science, art authentication, and even astrology, The Proof develops fresh insights into the challenge of reaching the truth.

Schauer combines perspectives from law, statistics, psychology, and the philosophy of science to evaluate how evidence should function in and out of court. He argues that evidence comes in degrees. Weak evidence is still some evidence. The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, but prolonged, fruitless efforts to substantiate a claim can go some distance in proving a negative. And evidence insufficient to lock someone up for a crime may be good enough to keep them out of jail. This book explains how to reason more effectively in everyday life, shows why people often reason poorly, and takes evidence as a pervasive problem, not just a matter of legal rules.

Recenzijos

Schauer displays a level of intellectual honesty one rarely encounters these daysThis is delightful stuff, all the more so coming from an author whose political sympathies clearly lie far from the Trump family. Chapters on the state of criminology and the nature of lying are similarly engaging. -- Barton Swaim * Wall Street Journal * [ Schauers] essential argument is that in assessing evidence, we need, first of all, to recognize that evidence comes in degrees (from weak to strong, from extraneous to relevant) and that probability, the likelihood that the evidence or testimony is accurate, matters[ He] has fascinating things to say about the reliability of eyewitnesses, hearsay and lie detectors, the efficacy of honor codes and courtroom oath taking, and the trustworthiness of letters of recommendation. -- Steven Mintz * Inside Higher Education * I would make Proof one of a handful of books that all incoming law students should readEssential and timely. -- Emily R. D. Murphy * Law and Society Review * Effectively explains how people understand and use evidence to build their beliefs, either individually or collectively, and also discusses the mechanics of poor reasoning and scientific inquiry. The resulting work is a foundational and engaging piece that serves as a primer for legal professionals, scientists, and the general public. -- Poulomi Bhadra * Jindal Global Law Review * Schauer is inviting us to distrust ourselves, to look for an external ground in our evidence assessments, one that reaches out for empirical evidence and verifiable inferences, instead of feelings, senses, perception, and intuitionThe elucidation of this value (of distrusting ourselves) is a great achievement[ A] fascinating book. -- Thomas Bustamante * Jotwell * At a time when the concept of truth itself is in trouble, this lively and accessible account provides vivid and deep analysis of the practices addressing what is reliably true in law, science, history, and ordinary life. Schauer's The Proof integrates knowledge of legal doctrine, social science studies, philosophy, and history and offers both timely and enduring insights. -- Martha Minow, former Dean of Harvard Law School and author of When Should Law Forgive? The Proof is an engaging tour of a range of knotty problems relating to evidence and reasoned inference. Fred Schauer shares a wealth of insights he has developed over several decades of teaching and writing about evidence law and the nature of proof. A pleasure to read. -- David Alan Sklansky, author of A Pattern of Violence A thoroughly enjoyable and accessible book on how the insights of evidence law can help all of us make better decisions in our everyday lives. A much-needed guide in a confusing world awash in information and misinformation. The Proof is sure to become a classic! -- Edward K. Cheng, Vanderbilt Law School With his uncanny ability to blend erudition and accessibility, Fred Schauer unpacks how to think about proofwhat people tell us, what we see, what the experts sayin everyday life. An extraordinarily readable book with breathtaking range and clarity, The Proof is an indispensable guide for those who seek to thoughtfully navigate the world. I cannot recommend it highly enough. -- Kimberly Kessler Ferzan, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School If you care about evidence, the search for the truth, about what we know and how we know it, you have a lot to learn from this timely and masterful book. -- Lee C. Bollinger, President and Seth Low Professor of the University, Columbia University Assessing evidence: that is the essence of judgment. Schauers The Proof imparts the disturbing lesson that we, be we individuals or organizations, are poor judges. Fortunately, this book wields tools from law, psychology, and statistics, plus an array of historic examples and contemporary accounts, to show how we can dramatically improve as assessors. Even better, it does so with wit. -- Richard Zeckhauser, Frank P. Ramsey Professor of Political Economy, Harvard University

Daugiau informacijos

Winner of Scribes Book Award 2023 (United States).
Preface ix
1 As a Matter of Fact
1(14)
2 Zebras, Horses, and the Nature of Inference
15(19)
3 The Burden of Proof
34(24)
4 How to Tell the Truth with Statistics
58(24)
5 Testimony, and Not Only in Court
82(16)
6 Testing Testimony
98(13)
7 Of Lies and Liars
111(18)
8 Can We Believe Our Eyes and Ears?
129(16)
9 Of Experts and Expertise
145(22)
10 The Science of Crime
167(18)
11 The Ever-Expanding Domain of Expertise
185(18)
12 The Relevance of the Past to the Present
203(23)
13 Seeing What We Want to See
226(15)
Notes 241(54)
Index 295
Frederick Schauer was the David and Mary Harrison Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of Virginia and the author of Free Speech: A Philosophical Enquiry; Playing by the Rules; Profiles, Probabilities, and Stereotypes; Thinking Like a Lawyer; and The Force of Law. He was a Fellow of the British Academy and of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, was the Frank Stanton Professor of the First Amendment at Harvard University for twenty years, and was a founding editor of the journal Legal Theory.