Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

El. knyga: Proposed Revisions to the Common Rule for the Protection of Human Subjects in the Behavioral and Social Sciences

  • Formatas: 182 pages
  • Išleidimo metai: 31-Mar-2014
  • Leidėjas: National Academies Press
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780309298094
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: 182 pages
  • Išleidimo metai: 31-Mar-2014
  • Leidėjas: National Academies Press
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780309298094
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:

DRM apribojimai

  • Kopijuoti:

    neleidžiama

  • Spausdinti:

    neleidžiama

  • El. knygos naudojimas:

    Skaitmeninių teisių valdymas (DRM)
    Leidykla pateikė šią knygą šifruota forma, o tai reiškia, kad norint ją atrakinti ir perskaityti reikia įdiegti nemokamą programinę įrangą. Norint skaityti šią el. knygą, turite susikurti Adobe ID . Daugiau informacijos  čia. El. knygą galima atsisiųsti į 6 įrenginius (vienas vartotojas su tuo pačiu Adobe ID).

    Reikalinga programinė įranga
    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą mobiliajame įrenginyje (telefone ar planšetiniame kompiuteryje), turite įdiegti šią nemokamą programėlę: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą asmeniniame arba „Mac“ kompiuteryje, Jums reikalinga  Adobe Digital Editions “ (tai nemokama programa, specialiai sukurta el. knygoms. Tai nėra tas pats, kas „Adobe Reader“, kurią tikriausiai jau turite savo kompiuteryje.)

    Negalite skaityti šios el. knygos naudodami „Amazon Kindle“.

Proposed Revisions to the Common Rule for the Protection of Human Subjects in the Behavioral and Social Sciences examines how to update human subjects protections regulations so that they effectively respond to current research contexts and methods. With a specific focus on social and behavioral sciences, this consensus report aims to address the dramatic alterations in the research landscapes that institutional review boards (IRBs) have come to inhabit during the past 40 years. The report aims to balance respect for the individual persons whose consent to participate makes research possible and respect for the social benefits that productive research communities make possible.



The ethics of human subjects research has captured scientific and regulatory attention for half a century. To keep abreast of the universe of changes that factor into the ethical conduct of research today, the Department of Health and Human Services published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) in July 2011. Recognizing that widespread technological and societal transformations have occurred in the contexts for and conduct of human research since the passage of the National Research Act of 1974, the ANPRM revisits the regulations mandated by the Act in a correspondingly comprehensive manner. Its proposals aim to modernize the Common Rule and to improve the efficiency of the work conducted under its auspices. Proposed Revisions to the Common Rule for the Protection of Human Subjects in the Behavioral and Social Sciences identifies issues raised in the ANPRM that are critical and feasible for the federal government to address for the protection of participants and for the advancement of the social and behavioral sciences. For each identified issue, this report provides guidance for IRBs on techniques to address it, with specific examples and best practice models to illustrate how the techniques would be applied to different behavioral and social sciences research procedures.

Table of Contents



Front Matter Summary 1 Introduction and Background 2 Rationales, Definitions, and Procedures Related to Research Not Involving Human Subjects and the Proposed Excused Category of Research 3 Determining Minimal Risk in Social and Behavioral Research 4 Informed Consent 5 Informational Risk in the Social and Behavioral Sciences 6 Improving the IRB Process Appendix A: Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects ("Common Rule") Appendix B: Table of Committee-Recommended Levels of IRB Review and Oversight Appendix C: Acronyms Appendix D: Biographical Sketches of Committee Members
Summary 1(12)
1 Introduction and Background
13(20)
Introduction
13(7)
Background
20(9)
Conclusion
29(1)
References
29(4)
2 Rationales, Definitions, and Procedures Related to Research Not Involving Human Subjects and the Proposed Excused Category of Research
33(26)
Introduction
33(7)
Clarifying the Scope of the Regulations
40(8)
Excused Research
48(7)
Clarifying the Distinction Between Excused and Expedited Research
55(1)
Annex 2.1
56(1)
References
57(2)
3 Determining Minimal Risk in Social and Behavioral Research
59(30)
Defining Minimal Risk
60(5)
Avoiding Overestimation and Underestimation of Harm
65(11)
Expedited Review
76(5)
Research Involving Greater than Minimal Risk and Requiring Full Board Review
81(1)
Streamlining Expedited and Full Board Review
82(1)
Establishing an Empirical Knowledge Base for Level of Risk
83(1)
References
84(5)
4 Informed Consent
89(20)
Flexibility in Informed Consent
91(11)
Informed Consent for Pre-existing Data
102(2)
References
104(5)
5 Informational Risk in the Social and Behavioral Sciences
109(26)
Informational Risk in Research
112(2)
Balancing the Risks and Benefits in Research
114(2)
Why Not HIPAA as the Mandated Data Security and Information Protection Standard?
116(3)
Data Protection Plans---Current and Future Guidance
119(6)
Facilitating Data Sharing and Use
125(4)
Data Protection for Primary and Secondary Qualitative Data
129(2)
References
131(4)
6 Improving the IRB Process
135(14)
The Scope of Federal Regulatory Authority
135(2)
Innovative Practices
137(8)
Conclusion
145(1)
Annex 6.1
146(1)
References
147(2)
APPENDIXES
A Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects ("Common Rule")
149(4)
B Table of Committee-Recommended Levels of IRB Review and Oversight
153(6)
C Acronyms
159(2)
D Biographical Sketches of Committee Members
161