Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Reason and Evidence in Husserl's Phenomenology [Minkštas viršelis]

3.00/5 (2 ratings by Goodreads)
  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 260 pages, aukštis x plotis: 229x152 mm, weight: 340 g
  • Serija: Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Išleidimo metai: 30-Oct-2018
  • Leidėjas: Northwestern University Press
  • ISBN-10: 0810138506
  • ISBN-13: 9780810138506
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
Reason and Evidence in Husserl's PhenomenologyDidesnis paveikslėlis
  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 260 pages, aukštis x plotis: 229x152 mm, weight: 340 g
  • Serija: Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Išleidimo metai: 30-Oct-2018
  • Leidėjas: Northwestern University Press
  • ISBN-10: 0810138506
  • ISBN-13: 9780810138506
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
Pastovi nuoroda: https://www.kriso.lt/db/9780810138506.html
Raktažodžiai:
In Reason and Evidence in Husserl's Phenomenology David Michael Kleinberg-Levin examines Husserl’s concept of necessary, a priori, and absolutely certain indubitable evidence, which he terms apodictic, and his related concept of complete evidence, which he terms adequate. To do so it explicates some of the more general relevant features of phenomenology as a whole.

 
List of Abbreviations
xiii
Acknowledgments xv
Preface xvii
1 Introduction
3(30)
[ 1] The Three Stages of Understanding: The Naive, the Scientific, and the Phenomenological
3(7)
[ 2] The Evidence of Intentional Objects Transcendent to Consciousness, and the Constitution of these Objects
10(23)
2 The Logische Untersuchungen
33(16)
[ 1] Introduction
33(1)
[ 2] Adequate Evidence
34(4)
[ 3] Apodicticity
38(4)
[ 4] A Critique of the Concept of Apodicticity Proposed in the Logische Untersuchungen
42(7)
3 The Ideas of 1913
49(31)
[ 1] The Principle of All Principles"
49(3)
[ 2] Adequate Evidence, the Ideal of Perfection
52(21)
[ 3] Apodicticity
73(7)
4 Erste Philosophie (1923/24)
80(24)
[ 1] The Domain Is Defined
80(1)
[ 2] Further Definition of Adequacy and Apodicticity
81(4)
[ 3] The Inadequacy and Non-Apodicticity of Outer Experience
85(2)
[ 4] Transcendental Critique as the Disclosure of Transcendental Subjectivity
87(2)
[ 5] Immanence as the Sphere of Adequate and Apodictic Evidence
89(4)
[ 6] A Critical Study of the Theory of Evidence Presented in Erste Philosophie
93(11)
5 The Formate und transzendentate Logik (1929)
104(10)
6 The Cartesian Meditations (1929)
114(36)
[ 1] Introduction
114(1)
[ 2] Husserl's Confrontation with the Heritage of Rationalism
115(3)
[ 3] The Evidence for Objectivity
118(3)
[ 4] Transcendental Subjectivity and Eidetic Structure
121(4)
[ 5] The New Definition of Apodicticity in Relation to Adequacy
125(5)
[ 6] First Criticism: Apodictic Evidence Must Also Be Adequate
130(6)
[ 7] Second Criticism: Problems with Husserl's "Apodictic Critique"
136(6)
[ 8] Third Criticism: Apodicticity Is Incompatible with the Genetic, Teleological "Work-Concept" of Constitution
142(2)
[ 9] Fourth Criticism: The Claim to Apodicticity in the Predicative Sphere Is Not Justified
144(6)
7 Apodicticity in the Eidetic Mode of Consciousness
150(53)
[ 1] Introduction
150(1)
[ 2] The General Phenomenological Significance of a Refutation of Apodicticity in the Eidetic Sphere
151(1)
[ 3] The Essence as an Object of Knowledge
152(3)
[ 4] Further Determination of the Essence through the Process of Eidetic Variation
155(7)
[ 5] How Husserl's Theory of Ideation Avoids Both Psychologism and Platonism
162(2)
[ 6] Husserl's Differentiation of Exact and Morphological Essences
164(7)
[ 7] Immanent and Exact Essences
171(5)
[ 8] The Inadequacy of All Levels of Eidetic Articulation
176(7)
[ 9] The Eidetic and Inductive Modes of Consciousness
183(7)
[ 10] The Incompleteness of Eidetic Critique
190(13)
8 Conclusion
203(6)
Appendix 209(13)
Bibliography 222(7)
Index 229
David Michael Kleinberg-Levin earned his PhD in Philosophy from Columbia University in 1967. He taught in the Humanities Department at MIT from 1968 until 1972, and in the Department of Philosophy at Northwestern University from 1972 to 2005. He specializes in Continental philosophy, hermeneutical phenomenology, and questions in aesthetics, clinical psychology, moral philosophy and critical social theory.