A part of the continuing effort to provide innovative in situ remediation techniques, Remediation of Firing-Range Impact Berms presents the results of a soil washing and leaching project. The demonstration set as its primary objective providing reliable, detailed performance data to evaluate the feasibility and cost of implementing a full-scale system. Its secondary objective was to demonstrate the effectiveness of the technology in producing a 'clean' soil based on analytical results.
The project included the following steps:
Bench scale treatability studies of prospective soils
Selection of a demonstration site
Pilot plant equipment design, installation, and shakedown
Execution of the demonstration at the selected DOD site
Preparation of the Final Technical Report (FTR) and the Technology Evaluation Report (TER)
The monograph discusses the results of the pilot plant study and includes the technical information necessary to reproduce the study full-scale. It recommends procedures for successful soil washing at small arms ranges. Remediation of Firing-Range Impact Berms will save you time and money when using in situ technology for soil remediation.
Executive Summary |
|
xxv | |
|
|
1 | (6) |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
General Description of Pilot Plant |
|
|
3 | (3) |
|
Full-Scale Plant Economics |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
Soil Washing Teatability Studies |
|
|
7 | (34) |
|
Particle Sizing and Gravity Separation |
|
|
8 | (4) |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
Attrition Scrubbing of Miramar Soil |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
Summary of Physical Treatment Studies |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
Chemical Treatment - Leaching |
|
|
13 | (14) |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
Acidic, Basic, and Salt Solutions and pH |
|
|
16 | (2) |
|
|
18 | (3) |
|
|
21 | (4) |
|
Lead Recovery from Leach Solution |
|
|
25 | (2) |
|
Leaching Treatability Studies |
|
|
27 | (6) |
|
Vat or Percolation Leaching |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
|
29 | (2) |
|
|
31 | (2) |
|
|
33 | (8) |
|
|
41 | (42) |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
Pilot Plant Description and Design |
|
|
43 | (18) |
|
|
43 | (9) |
|
Equipment Design Specifications and Capacities |
|
|
52 | (8) |
|
Summary of Equipment Design and Operating Capacities |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
|
61 | (7) |
|
Gravity Separation System |
|
|
61 | (3) |
|
|
64 | (2) |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
68 | (15) |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
|
69 | (2) |
|
Process Design, Operations, and Monitoring |
|
|
71 | (8) |
|
Ancillary Equipment Operation |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
Pilot Plant Demonstration Results Summary |
|
|
81 | (2) |
|
Design and Operation of Hypothetical System |
|
|
83 | (10) |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
|
83 | (10) |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
|
83 | (4) |
|
Equipment Selection and Design |
|
|
87 | (6) |
|
|
93 | (14) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
Cost Analysis for a Hypothetical Site |
|
|
94 | (9) |
|
Mobilization and Preparation Work |
|
|
95 | (2) |
|
|
97 | (5) |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
Effluent Treatment and Disposal Cost |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
Residual Waste Shipping and Handling |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
Permitting and Regulatory Requirements |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
Maximizing Treatment Rate |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
Potential Effects on Cost or Performance |
|
|
103 | (4) |
|
Performance and Potential Application |
|
|
107 | (260) |
|
Operability of the Technology |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
Advantages of the Designed Soil Washing System |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
Site Characteristics Suitable for the Technology |
|
|
108 | (2) |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
Surface, Subsurface, and Clearance Requirements |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
Site Support Facilities and Equipment |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
Materials Handling Requirements |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
Limitations of the Technology |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
Objectives and Performance as Compared to ARAR |
|
|
110 | (5) |
|
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) |
|
|
111 | (3) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
Occupational Safety and Health Administration Requirements (OSHA) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
|
115 | (2) |
Appendices |
|
|
Appendix A CMRI Treatability Study Results |
|
|
117 | (94) |
|
A.1 Introduction, Summary and Conclusions |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
A.3 Sizing - Gravity Separation |
|
|
118 | (5) |
|
A.4 Attrition Scrubbing of Miramar Coarse Fraction |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
Appendix A.1 Size and Gravity Separation Data Sheets |
|
|
127 | (9) |
|
Appendix A.2 Attrition Scrubber Data Sheets |
|
|
136 | (2) |
|
Appendix A.3 Nydrocyclone Data Sheets |
|
|
138 | (3) |
|
Appendix A.4 Percolation Leach Data Sheets |
|
|
141 | (8) |
|
Appendix A.5 Agitation Leach Data Sheets |
|
|
149 | (62) |
|
Appendix B Demonstration Process Flowsheet |
|
|
211 | (2) |
|
Appendix C Operating Rates and Mass Balance for NAS Miramar Pilot Plant |
|
|
213 | (12) |
|
C.1 Specifications for Mass Balance |
|
|
213 | (12) |
|
Appendix D Supporting Calculations for Equipment Capacities |
|
|
225 | (38) |
|
|
225 | (6) |
|
|
231 | (2) |
|
|
233 | (3) |
|
|
236 | (8) |
|
|
244 | (4) |
|
D.6 Reichert Spiral Concentrator |
|
|
248 | (8) |
|
|
256 | (3) |
|
|
259 | (4) |
|
Appendix E Pilot Plant Photographs |
|
|
263 | (14) |
|
Appendix F Daily Log and Results of Feed Rate Tests |
|
|
277 | (10) |
|
|
277 | (1) |
|
|
278 | (4) |
|
|
282 | (5) |
|
Appendix G Analytical Discussion |
|
|
287 | (6) |
|
|
287 | (1) |
|
G.2 Analytical Discussion |
|
|
287 | (3) |
|
|
290 | (3) |
|
Appendix H Process Control and Monitoring Data |
|
|
293 | (4) |
|
|
293 | (1) |
|
H.2 Process Control Physical Layout |
|
|
293 | (4) |
|
Appendix I Process Flowsheet and Mass Balance for Full-scale Plant |
|
|
297 | (6) |
|
Appendix J Equipment Calculations for Full-scale Plant |
|
|
303 | (42) |
|
|
307 | (3) |
|
J.2 Double Deck Wet Screen |
|
|
310 | (3) |
|
|
313 | (2) |
|
J.4 Dewatering Screen #1 |
|
|
315 | (1) |
|
|
316 | (4) |
|
J.6 Secondary Mineral Jig |
|
|
320 | (1) |
|
J.7 Dewatering Screen #2 |
|
|
321 | (1) |
|
J.8 Primary MD LG7 Spiral Concentrator |
|
|
322 | (4) |
|
J.9 Secondary MD LG7 Spiral Concentrator |
|
|
326 | (2) |
|
J.10 Dewatering Screen #3 |
|
|
328 | (3) |
|
|
331 | (1) |
|
|
332 | (1) |
|
|
333 | (2) |
|
|
335 | (6) |
|
J.15 Water and Slurry Lines |
|
|
341 | (1) |
|
|
341 | (4) |
|
Appendix K Design Figures for Full-scale Plant |
|
|
345 | (10) |
|
Appendix L Cost Analysis Backup Data |
|
|
355 | (12) |
|
L.1 Project Durations and Labor Rates |
|
|
355 | (1) |
|
L.2 WBS 1: Mobilization and Preparatory Work |
|
|
356 | (3) |
|
L.3 WBS 2: Physical Treatment |
|
|
359 | (4) |
|
L.4 WBS 3: Demobilization |
|
|
363 | (1) |
|
|
364 | (3) |
References |
|
367 | |
Douglas A. Hlousek, Douglas A. Hlousek is a senior project manager with Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. He has over 25 years of experience in construction management, project management, project controls, and estimating. His expertise is in design-build construction, hazardous waste site remediation, underground storage tank remediation, earthwork, site drainage, water distribution, and sewage disposal projects. He has a B.S. in general engineering from the United States Coast Guard Academy, and an A.S. in business management from Fisher College. He received a certification in environmental hazardous waste management at Northeastern University. He is a technical director for Metcalf & Eddys NoVOCs innovative technology, providing project control support for the design, pricing structure, and scheduling of NoVOCs in-well stripping projects nationwide. Mr. Hlousek was the program manager for the technology evaluation for Remediation of Lead Contaminated Soils at Small-Arms Firing Ranges Using Mining and Beneficiation Technologies. Mr. Hlousek has presented papers and published articles in the areas of remediation and innovative technologies., Thomas A. Phillips, Thomas A. Phillips is the President of Hydro GeoTech, Inc. where he is a consultant involved in applying technical solutions to environmental problems at industrial plants and military bases. He has a B.S. in chemical engineering from the University of Maryland. Since 1973, Mr. Phillips has worked in a variety of capacities while employed by the U.S. Bureau of Mines (BOM). In his most recent position, he was research supervisor for the environmental program at the Salt Lake Research Center. In this position, Mr. Phillips supervised 35 researchers who investigated mineralrelated environmental issues. He also led or was part of interagency teams involved in acid-mine drainage using water treatment technologies, mine closures, military base closures, and BOM realignment and environmental planning. Mr. Phillips experience includes serving as a staff engineer where he was responsible for several major programs for primary minerals and recycling and for long range planning, reviewing research plans, and assessing their progress. He has also served as a special assistant to the BOM Director of the Solidad Canyon Project. Mr. Phillips has published several articles and many internal documents involving mineral industry and remediation technologies., Donald F. Lowe, Donald F. Lowe is an Assistant Program Manager with AATDF at Rice University where he managed four projects involving the field demonstration of innovative technologies. Dr. Lowe has a Ph.D. in metallurgy-chemical engineering from the University of Arizona, a M.S. in metallurgical engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and a B.S. in mining engineering from the University of North Dakota. In his capacity as project manager for AATDF, Dr. Lowe provided the necessary managerial guidance and technical expertise to bring each project through a successful demonstration. He has also been an active participant in the preparation of the reports for each project. Since 1986, Dr. Lowe has been involved as a technical manager, proposal manager, and senior engineer with several environmental firms. His management responsibilities included cost estimation of remediation projects and economic feasibility studies for numerous processes. He also has provided technical guidance for many remediation projects. Prior to 1986, Dr. Lowe was employed for 25 years as a research supervisor or research engineer with four primary mining or metals recycling companies. He has several patents and publications that are related to metals extraction and recycling processes., Karen L. Duston, Karen L. Duston is a Research Scientist in the Energy and Environmental Systems Institute (EESI) at Rice University. As a technical reviewer and editor, Dr. Duston has been active in the preparation of the reports for the AATDF projects. She has held the position of Coordinator of the Superfund University Training Institute (SUTI), a federally funded program offering environmental assessment and remediation training to state and federal employees, and as manager of the biological remediation laboratory at Rice University. She was responsible for the daily operation of SUTI and coordinated government, academic, and industrial efforts to offer and prepare instructional materials for the courses. Dr. Duston has a Ph.D. in environmental science and engineering from Rice University, a M.S. in microbiology from Texas A&M University, and a B.S. in chemistry and in metallurgical engineering from the University of Texas at El Paso., Carroll L. Oubre, Carroll L. Oubre is the Program Manager for the DOD/AATDF Program. As Program Manager he is responsible for the day-to-day management of the $19.3 million DOD/AATDF Program. This includes guidance of the AATDF staff, overview of the 12 demonstration projects, assuring project milestones are met within budget, and that complete reporting of the results are timely. Dr. Oubre has a B.S. in chemical engineering from the University of Southwestern Louisiana, a M.S. in chemical engineering from Ohio State University, and a Ph.D. in chemical engineering from Rice University. He worked for Shell Oil Company for 28 years, with his last job as Manager of Environmental Research and Development for Royal Dutch Shell in England. Prior to that, he was Director of Environmental Research and Development at Shell Development Company in Houston, Texas., C. H. (Herb) Ward, C. H. (Herb) Ward is the Foyt Family Chair of Engineering in the George R. Brown School of Engineering at Rice University. He is also Professor of Environmental Science and Engineering and Ecology and Evolutionary Biology., Dr. Ward has undergraduate (B.S.) and graduate (M.S. and Ph.D.) degrees from New Mexico State University and Cornell University, respectively. He also earned the M.P.H. in environmental health from the University of Texas., Following 22 years as Chair of the Department of Environmental Science & Engineering at Rice University, Dr. Ward is now Director of the Energy and Environmental Systems Institute (EESI), a university-wide program designed to mobilize industry, government, and academia to focus on problems related to energy production and environmental protection., Dr. Ward is also Director of the Department of Defense Advanced Applied Technology Demonstration Facility (AATDF) Program, a distinguished consortium of university-based environmental research centers supported by consulting environmental engineering firms to guide selection, development, demonstration, and commercialization of advanced applied environmental restoration technologies for the DOD. For the past 18 years, he has directed the activities of the National Center for Ground Water Research (NCGWR), a consortium of universities charged with conducting long-range exploratory research to help anticipate and solve the nations emerging ground water problems. He is also Co-Director of the EPA-sponsored Hazardous Substances Research Center/South & Southwest (HSRC/S&SW), whose research focus is on contaminated sediments and dredged materials., Dr. Ward has served as President of both the American Institute of Biological Sciences and the Society for Industrial Microbiology. He is the founding and current Editor-in-Chief of the international journal Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry.