Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Remediation of Firing Range Impact Berms [Kietas viršelis]

(Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA)
  • Formatas: Hardback, 410 pages, aukštis x plotis: 254x178 mm, weight: 901 g, 257 Tables, black and white; 40 Halftones, black and white
  • Išleidimo metai: 27-Apr-2000
  • Leidėjas: CRC Press Inc
  • ISBN-10: 1566704626
  • ISBN-13: 9781566704625
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: Hardback, 410 pages, aukštis x plotis: 254x178 mm, weight: 901 g, 257 Tables, black and white; 40 Halftones, black and white
  • Išleidimo metai: 27-Apr-2000
  • Leidėjas: CRC Press Inc
  • ISBN-10: 1566704626
  • ISBN-13: 9781566704625
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
A part of the continuing effort to provide innovative in situ remediation techniques, Remediation of Firing-Range Impact Berms presents the results of a soil washing and leaching project. The demonstration set as its primary objective providing reliable, detailed performance data to evaluate the feasibility and cost of implementing a full-scale system. Its secondary objective was to demonstrate the effectiveness of the technology in producing a 'clean' soil based on analytical results.
The project included the following steps:
  • Bench scale treatability studies of prospective soils
  • Selection of a demonstration site
  • Pilot plant equipment design, installation, and shakedown
  • Execution of the demonstration at the selected DOD site
  • Preparation of the Final Technical Report (FTR) and the Technology Evaluation Report (TER)
    The monograph discusses the results of the pilot plant study and includes the technical information necessary to reproduce the study full-scale. It recommends procedures for successful soil washing at small arms ranges. Remediation of Firing-Range Impact Berms will save you time and money when using in situ technology for soil remediation.
  • Executive Summary xxv
    Introduction
    1(6)
    Project Overview
    1(1)
    Site Identification
    2(1)
    General Description of Pilot Plant
    3(3)
    Full-Scale Plant Economics
    6(1)
    Soil Washing Teatability Studies
    7(34)
    Particle Sizing and Gravity Separation
    8(4)
    NAS Miramar
    8(2)
    Twentynine Palms
    10(1)
    Fort Dix
    10(2)
    Attrition Scrubbing of Miramar Soil
    12(1)
    Hydrocyclone Tests
    12(1)
    Summary of Physical Treatment Studies
    13(1)
    Chemical Treatment - Leaching
    13(14)
    Leaching Chemistry
    14(2)
    Acidic, Basic, and Salt Solutions and pH
    16(2)
    Activity Coefficients
    18(3)
    Complex Ion Chemistry
    21(4)
    Lead Recovery from Leach Solution
    25(2)
    Leaching Treatability Studies
    27(6)
    Vat or Percolation Leaching
    27(2)
    Agitation Leaching
    29(2)
    Leaching Conclusions
    31(2)
    Flowsheet Design
    33(8)
    Technology Demonstration
    41(42)
    Test Site Description
    41(2)
    Site Selection
    41(1)
    Site Description
    41(1)
    Site Location
    42(1)
    Site History
    42(1)
    Pilot Plant Description and Design
    43(18)
    Process Flow Design
    43(9)
    Equipment Design Specifications and Capacities
    52(8)
    Summary of Equipment Design and Operating Capacities
    60(1)
    Pilot System Fabrication
    61(7)
    Gravity Separation System
    61(3)
    Vat Leaching System
    64(2)
    Water System
    66(1)
    Compressed Air System
    67(1)
    Electrical System
    67(1)
    Process Control System
    67(1)
    Pilot System Shakedown
    67(1)
    Project Execution
    68(15)
    Field Implementation
    68(1)
    Operating Capacities
    69(2)
    Process Design, Operations, and Monitoring
    71(8)
    Ancillary Equipment Operation
    79(1)
    Health and Safety
    80(1)
    Pilot Plant Demonstration Results Summary
    81(2)
    Design and Operation of Hypothetical System
    83(10)
    Remedial Objectives
    83(1)
    Engineering Design
    83(10)
    Plant Design Criteria
    83(1)
    Conceptual Design
    83(4)
    Equipment Selection and Design
    87(6)
    Economic Analysis
    93(14)
    Introduction
    93(1)
    Assumptions
    93(1)
    Cost Analysis for a Hypothetical Site
    94(9)
    Mobilization and Preparation Work
    95(2)
    Physical Treatment
    97(5)
    Demobilization
    102(1)
    Effluent Treatment and Disposal Cost
    102(1)
    Residual Waste Shipping and Handling
    102(1)
    Permitting and Regulatory Requirements
    102(1)
    Analytical Services
    102(1)
    Maximizing Treatment Rate
    103(1)
    Potential Effects on Cost or Performance
    103(4)
    Performance and Potential Application
    107(260)
    Operability of the Technology
    107(1)
    Applicable Wastes
    107(1)
    Advantages of the Designed Soil Washing System
    108(1)
    Site Characteristics Suitable for the Technology
    108(2)
    Site Selection
    108(1)
    Surface, Subsurface, and Clearance Requirements
    108(1)
    Utility Requirements
    109(1)
    Site Support Facilities and Equipment
    109(1)
    Climate
    109(1)
    Materials Handling Requirements
    110(1)
    Limitations of the Technology
    110(1)
    Objectives and Performance as Compared to ARAR
    110(5)
    Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA)
    110(1)
    Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
    111(3)
    Clean Air Act (CAA)
    114(1)
    Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
    114(1)
    Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
    114(1)
    Occupational Safety and Health Administration Requirements (OSHA)
    114(1)
    Personnel Requirements
    115(1)
    Training
    115(1)
    Health and Safety
    115(2)
    Appendices
    Appendix A CMRI Treatability Study Results
    117(94)
    A.1 Introduction, Summary and Conclusions
    117(1)
    A.2 Samples
    118(1)
    A.3 Sizing - Gravity Separation
    118(5)
    A.4 Attrition Scrubbing of Miramar Coarse Fraction
    123(1)
    A.5 Hydrocyclone Studies
    123(1)
    A.6 Percolation Leaching
    124(1)
    A.7 Agitation Leaching
    125(1)
    A.8 Disclaimer
    126(1)
    Appendix A.1 Size and Gravity Separation Data Sheets
    127(9)
    Appendix A.2 Attrition Scrubber Data Sheets
    136(2)
    Appendix A.3 Nydrocyclone Data Sheets
    138(3)
    Appendix A.4 Percolation Leach Data Sheets
    141(8)
    Appendix A.5 Agitation Leach Data Sheets
    149(62)
    Appendix B Demonstration Process Flowsheet
    211(2)
    Appendix C Operating Rates and Mass Balance for NAS Miramar Pilot Plant
    213(12)
    C.1 Specifications for Mass Balance
    213(12)
    Appendix D Supporting Calculations for Equipment Capacities
    225(38)
    D.1 Attrition Scrubber
    225(6)
    D.2 Trommel
    231(2)
    D.3 Mineral Jig
    233(3)
    D.4 Spiral Classifier
    236(8)
    D.5 Hydrocyclone
    244(4)
    D.6 Reichert Spiral Concentrator
    248(8)
    D.7 Sieve Bend Screen
    256(3)
    D.8 Knelson Concentrator
    259(4)
    Appendix E Pilot Plant Photographs
    263(14)
    Appendix F Daily Log and Results of Feed Rate Tests
    277(10)
    F.1 Introduction
    277(1)
    F.2 Daily Project Log
    278(4)
    F.3 Feed Rates
    282(5)
    Appendix G Analytical Discussion
    287(6)
    G.1 Introduction
    287(1)
    G.2 Analytical Discussion
    287(3)
    G.3 Soil Reuse Potential
    290(3)
    Appendix H Process Control and Monitoring Data
    293(4)
    H.1 Introduction
    293(1)
    H.2 Process Control Physical Layout
    293(4)
    Appendix I Process Flowsheet and Mass Balance for Full-scale Plant
    297(6)
    Appendix J Equipment Calculations for Full-scale Plant
    303(42)
    J.1 Grizzly Screen
    307(3)
    J.2 Double Deck Wet Screen
    310(3)
    J.3 Primary Mineral Jig
    313(2)
    J.4 Dewatering Screen #1
    315(1)
    J.5 Spiral Classifier
    316(4)
    J.6 Secondary Mineral Jig
    320(1)
    J.7 Dewatering Screen #2
    321(1)
    J.8 Primary MD LG7 Spiral Concentrator
    322(4)
    J.9 Secondary MD LG7 Spiral Concentrator
    326(2)
    J.10 Dewatering Screen #3
    328(3)
    J.11 Humates Screen
    331(1)
    J.12 Clarifier
    332(1)
    J.13 Centrifuge
    333(2)
    J.14 Pumps
    335(6)
    J.15 Water and Slurry Lines
    341(1)
    J.16 Electrical Power
    341(4)
    Appendix K Design Figures for Full-scale Plant
    345(10)
    Appendix L Cost Analysis Backup Data
    355(12)
    L.1 Project Durations and Labor Rates
    355(1)
    L.2 WBS 1: Mobilization and Preparatory Work
    356(3)
    L.3 WBS 2: Physical Treatment
    359(4)
    L.4 WBS 3: Demobilization
    363(1)
    L.5 Vendor Quotes
    364(3)
    References 367


    Douglas A. Hlousek, Douglas A. Hlousek is a senior project manager with Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. He has over 25 years of experience in construction management, project management, project controls, and estimating. His expertise is in design-build construction, hazardous waste site remediation, underground storage tank remediation, earthwork, site drainage, water distribution, and sewage disposal projects. He has a B.S. in general engineering from the United States Coast Guard Academy, and an A.S. in business management from Fisher College. He received a certification in environmental hazardous waste management at Northeastern University. He is a technical director for Metcalf & Eddys NoVOCs innovative technology, providing project control support for the design, pricing structure, and scheduling of NoVOCs in-well stripping projects nationwide. Mr. Hlousek was the program manager for the technology evaluation for Remediation of Lead Contaminated Soils at Small-Arms Firing Ranges Using Mining and Beneficiation Technologies. Mr. Hlousek has presented papers and published articles in the areas of remediation and innovative technologies., Thomas A. Phillips, Thomas A. Phillips is the President of Hydro GeoTech, Inc. where he is a consultant involved in applying technical solutions to environmental problems at industrial plants and military bases. He has a B.S. in chemical engineering from the University of Maryland. Since 1973, Mr. Phillips has worked in a variety of capacities while employed by the U.S. Bureau of Mines (BOM). In his most recent position, he was research supervisor for the environmental program at the Salt Lake Research Center. In this position, Mr. Phillips supervised 35 researchers who investigated mineralrelated environmental issues. He also led or was part of interagency teams involved in acid-mine drainage using water treatment technologies, mine closures, military base closures, and BOM realignment and environmental planning. Mr. Phillips experience includes serving as a staff engineer where he was responsible for several major programs for primary minerals and recycling and for long range planning, reviewing research plans, and assessing their progress. He has also served as a special assistant to the BOM Director of the Solidad Canyon Project. Mr. Phillips has published several articles and many internal documents involving mineral industry and remediation technologies., Donald F. Lowe, Donald F. Lowe is an Assistant Program Manager with AATDF at Rice University where he managed four projects involving the field demonstration of innovative technologies. Dr. Lowe has a Ph.D. in metallurgy-chemical engineering from the University of Arizona, a M.S. in metallurgical engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and a B.S. in mining engineering from the University of North Dakota. In his capacity as project manager for AATDF, Dr. Lowe provided the necessary managerial guidance and technical expertise to bring each project through a successful demonstration. He has also been an active participant in the preparation of the reports for each project. Since 1986, Dr. Lowe has been involved as a technical manager, proposal manager, and senior engineer with several environmental firms. His management responsibilities included cost estimation of remediation projects and economic feasibility studies for numerous processes. He also has provided technical guidance for many remediation projects. Prior to 1986, Dr. Lowe was employed for 25 years as a research supervisor or research engineer with four primary mining or metals recycling companies. He has several patents and publications that are related to metals extraction and recycling processes., Karen L. Duston, Karen L. Duston is a Research Scientist in the Energy and Environmental Systems Institute (EESI) at Rice University. As a technical reviewer and editor, Dr. Duston has been active in the preparation of the reports for the AATDF projects. She has held the position of Coordinator of the Superfund University Training Institute (SUTI), a federally funded program offering environmental assessment and remediation training to state and federal employees, and as manager of the biological remediation laboratory at Rice University. She was responsible for the daily operation of SUTI and coordinated government, academic, and industrial efforts to offer and prepare instructional materials for the courses. Dr. Duston has a Ph.D. in environmental science and engineering from Rice University, a M.S. in microbiology from Texas A&M University, and a B.S. in chemistry and in metallurgical engineering from the University of Texas at El Paso., Carroll L. Oubre, Carroll L. Oubre is the Program Manager for the DOD/AATDF Program. As Program Manager he is responsible for the day-to-day management of the $19.3 million DOD/AATDF Program. This includes guidance of the AATDF staff, overview of the 12 demonstration projects, assuring project milestones are met within budget, and that complete reporting of the results are timely. Dr. Oubre has a B.S. in chemical engineering from the University of Southwestern Louisiana, a M.S. in chemical engineering from Ohio State University, and a Ph.D. in chemical engineering from Rice University. He worked for Shell Oil Company for 28 years, with his last job as Manager of Environmental Research and Development for Royal Dutch Shell in England. Prior to that, he was Director of Environmental Research and Development at Shell Development Company in Houston, Texas., C. H. (Herb) Ward, C. H. (Herb) Ward is the Foyt Family Chair of Engineering in the George R. Brown School of Engineering at Rice University. He is also Professor of Environmental Science and Engineering and Ecology and Evolutionary Biology., Dr. Ward has undergraduate (B.S.) and graduate (M.S. and Ph.D.) degrees from New Mexico State University and Cornell University, respectively. He also earned the M.P.H. in environmental health from the University of Texas., Following 22 years as Chair of the Department of Environmental Science & Engineering at Rice University, Dr. Ward is now Director of the Energy and Environmental Systems Institute (EESI), a university-wide program designed to mobilize industry, government, and academia to focus on problems related to energy production and environmental protection., Dr. Ward is also Director of the Department of Defense Advanced Applied Technology Demonstration Facility (AATDF) Program, a distinguished consortium of university-based environmental research centers supported by consulting environmental engineering firms to guide selection, development, demonstration, and commercialization of advanced applied environmental restoration technologies for the DOD. For the past 18 years, he has directed the activities of the National Center for Ground Water Research (NCGWR), a consortium of universities charged with conducting long-range exploratory research to help anticipate and solve the nations emerging ground water problems. He is also Co-Director of the EPA-sponsored Hazardous Substances Research Center/South & Southwest (HSRC/S&SW), whose research focus is on contaminated sediments and dredged materials., Dr. Ward has served as President of both the American Institute of Biological Sciences and the Society for Industrial Microbiology. He is the founding and current Editor-in-Chief of the international journal Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry.