Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Reparative Universities: Why Diversity Alone Won't Solve Racism in Higher Ed [Kietas viršelis]

  • Formatas: Hardback, 288 pages, aukštis x plotis x storis: 201x132x41 mm, weight: 386 g
  • Serija: Critical University Studies
  • Išleidimo metai: 28-Mar-2023
  • Leidėjas: Johns Hopkins University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1421445603
  • ISBN-13: 9781421445601
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: Hardback, 288 pages, aukštis x plotis x storis: 201x132x41 mm, weight: 386 g
  • Serija: Critical University Studies
  • Išleidimo metai: 28-Mar-2023
  • Leidėjas: Johns Hopkins University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1421445603
  • ISBN-13: 9781421445601
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
A timely investigation of why diversity alone is insufficient in higher education and how universities can use reparative actions to become anti-racist institutions.

As institutions increasingly reckon with histories entangled with slavery and Indigenous dispossession, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts occupy a central role in the strategy and resources of higher education. Yet reparation is rarely offered as a viable strategy for institutional transformation. In Reparative Universities, Ariana Gonzįlez Stokas undertakes a critical and decolonial analysis of DEI work, linking contemporary practices of diversity to longer colonial histories. Gonzįlez Stokas argues that diversity is an insufficient concept for efforts concerned with anti-oppression, anti-racism, equity, and decolonization. Given its historical ties to colonialism, can higher education foster reconciliation and healing?

Reparation is offered as a pathway toward untangling higher education from its colonial roots. Gonzįlez Stokas develops the term "epistemic reparation" to describe a mode of social-historical accountability that can already be seen at work in historical examples, as well as current events in the United States, South Africa, and Canada. Recent legal decisions by Georgetown University and the Princeton Theological seminary to enact economic recompense for buying and selling human beings are evidence of attempts to redress higher education's violent histories and the colonial structures they reproduce every day on college campuses.

Engaging with a broad range of theories from decolonial philosophy to organizational psychology, Gonzįlez Stokas offers a pathwayguided by reparative activitiesfor institutional workers frustrated by what often feels, as Sara Ahmed describes, like "banging one's head against a brick wall." Reparative Universities offers insight into why DEI efforts have been disconnected from past injustices and why unsettling diversity and engaging meaningful repair are critical for the future of higher education.

Daugiau informacijos

A timely investigation of why diversity alone is insufficient in higher education and how universities can use reparative actions to become anti-racist institutions.
Prelude 1(3)
Introduction 4(13)
PART I A Cabinet of Diversity
17(86)
Object 1 Diversity Doesn't Work?
23(19)
Object 2 Epistemic Dominance
42(12)
Object 3 From Wunderkammern to the Majors: The Discipling of Difference
54(12)
Object 4 Patrol / The Ordering of Difference
66(11)
Object 5 Accumulation / Difference That Makes No Difference
77(3)
Object 6 Colorblindness / Federalist Paper No. 6
80(7)
Object 7 Partition / Grievances Not of Their Making
87(8)
Object 8 The Morrill Acts: "The Land-Grab University"
95(8)
Afterthoughts
101(2)
PART II The Constellation of Reparation
103(78)
Star 1 Attempted Remedies
119(18)
Star 2 Outlines of Epistemic Reparation
137(25)
Star 3 How Is a University Like a Light Switch?
162(13)
Afterthoughts
175(6)
PART III Reparative Endeavors
181(62)
Thread 1 Why Poetics?
183(9)
Thread 2 Breathtaking Landscapes: Place-Based Interventions
192(13)
Thread 3 Counter-Space as the Dramatization of a Poetics of Refusal
205(14)
Thread 4 Gates/Gatekeeping
219(11)
Thread 5 Unraveling Patrol
230(8)
Thread 6 From Rank to Rhizome
238(5)
Afterthoughts 243(12)
Acknowledgments 255(4)
Bibliography 259(12)
Index 271
Ariana Gonzįlez Stokas (TORONTO, ON) has spent the last two decades working in institutions as a faculty member and senior-level DEI administrator committed to co-inventing what is possible in learning environments.