Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Revising the APA Ethics Code 1st ed. 2017 [Kietas viršelis]

  • Formatas: Hardback, 307 pages, aukštis x plotis: 235x155 mm, weight: 6092 g, 50 Illustrations, color; 17 Illustrations, black and white; XV, 307 p. 67 illus., 50 illus. in color., 1 Hardback
  • Išleidimo metai: 08-Sep-2017
  • Leidėjas: Springer International Publishing AG
  • ISBN-10: 331960001X
  • ISBN-13: 9783319600017
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
Revising the APA Ethics Code 1st ed. 2017Didesnis paveikslėlis
  • Formatas: Hardback, 307 pages, aukštis x plotis: 235x155 mm, weight: 6092 g, 50 Illustrations, color; 17 Illustrations, black and white; XV, 307 p. 67 illus., 50 illus. in color., 1 Hardback
  • Išleidimo metai: 08-Sep-2017
  • Leidėjas: Springer International Publishing AG
  • ISBN-10: 331960001X
  • ISBN-13: 9783319600017
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
Pastovi nuoroda: https://www.kriso.lt/db/9783319600017.html
Raktažodžiai:

This integrative volume proposes major revisions to the APA ethics code and works toward creating an ethics code applicable across psychology, psychiatry, and related mental health professions. Careful analysis identifies theoretical and structural deficits in the principles and standards comprising the existing APA code, corrects its ambiguities, and provides scientific and compare-contrast illustrations to address current and potential controversies arising from current gray areas. Proposed revisions are informed by the American Medical Association, Canadian Psychological Association, and international ethics codes, emphasizing not only clearer language and diverse situations but also deeper conceptualizations of professional skills such as decision-making and client engagement. Ideally, the resulting universal code would be more inclusive of evolving ethical challenges in increasingly complex work environments and society.

Included in the coverage:

Comparison of the APA and CPA ethics codes.

  • Proposing five core and five supplementary ethical principles and their sub-principles.
    • Analyzing the APA’s ethical standards toward revising the APA ethics code.
  • Elucidating new standards, domains, sub-domains, and meta-principles.
  • Culling lessons from the 2017 AMA medical ethics code.
  • Examining ethical decision-making: fallacies/biases and models.
  • Proposing new concepts, such as participatory ethics and psychological co-regulation.
  • Giving concrete and practical recommendations toward revising the APA ethics code and creating a universal mental health ethics code.

An exhaustive text that spans clinical, research, teaching, and education domains, Revising the APA Ethics Code is essential reading for ethics scholars, practitioners, and the APA administrative and ethics committee hierarchies. These real-world guidelines will help ensure that the mental health professions remain both modern and moral.

1 Introduction to Revising the APA Ethics Code
1(36)
1.1
Chapter Summary
1(1)
1.2 Book Introduction
2(2)
1.3
Chapter Summaries
4(5)
1.3.1 An Introduction
4(1)
1.3.2 On New Ethical Principles and Domains of Standards
5(1)
1.3.3 On 10 Ethical Psychological Principles And 50 Sub-principles
5(1)
1.3.4 On Revising the APA Standards
6(1)
1.3.5 More on Standards, Domains, and Principles and Proposing Meta-principles
6(1)
1.3.6 Three Commentaries on the APA Ethics Code and on Ethics
7(1)
1.3.7 Learning from the 2017 AMA Medical Ethics Code
7(1)
1.3.8 Ethical Decision Making: Fallacies/Biases and Models
8(1)
1.3.9 On Recommendations, Participatory Ethics, and Psychological Co-regulation
8(1)
1.4 Principles, Definitions, and Assumptions
9(1)
1.4.1 Principles
9(1)
1.4.2 Definitions
9(1)
1.5 Assumptions in Creating a General Framework of Mental Health Ethical Principles
10(4)
1.6 Current Literature Review on Ethical Codes in Mental Health
14(17)
1.6.1 Ethics and Ethics Codes
14(2)
1.6.2 APA Approaches
16(1)
1.6.3 Criticisms
17(2)
1.6.4 Revisions
19(3)
1.6.5 APA Ethics Code Highlights
22(1)
1.6.6 Complaints
23(2)
1.6.7 Other Approaches
25(2)
1.6.8 Science
27(1)
1.6.9 Law
28(1)
1.6.10 Forensics
29(1)
1.6.11 Practice
30(1)
1.7
Chapter Conclusion
31(6)
References
32(5)
2 Comparing the APA and CPA Ethics Codes
37(26)
2.1
Chapter Summary
37(1)
2.2 Reworking the Core Ethical Principles into Revised Principles
38(2)
2.2.1 Comparing the APA and CPA Ethics Codes
38(1)
2.2.2 Comment
39(1)
2.3 General Framework of Mental Health Ethical Principles
40(7)
2.3.1 A Neo-Maslovian Model of Core Ethical Principles
42(3)
2.3.2 The CPA Code and the Neo-Maslovian Model
45(1)
2.3.3 The APA Code and the Neo-Maslovian Model
46(1)
2.4 Finding Common Cause on Terms for Principles in the APA and CPA Ethics Codes
47(5)
2.4.1 Principle Names
47(3)
2.4.2 Relationship of the Principles
50(2)
2.5 Reworking the Categories of the Core Ethical Standards into Domains of Standards
52(8)
2.5.1 Introduction
52(1)
2.5.2 Domains of Standards
53(1)
2.5.3 APA
54(2)
2.5.4 Five Domains of Ethical Standards
56(1)
2.5.5 Sub-domains
57(2)
2.5.6 CPA
59(1)
2.6
Chapter Conclusion
60(3)
References
61(2)
3 The Five Core and the Five Supplementary Ethical Principles and Their Sub-principles
63(30)
3.1
Chapter Summary
63(2)
3.2 The Five Proposed Core Psychological Ethical Principles and Their Sub-principles
65(10)
3.2.1 Life Preservation
65(1)
3.2.2 Caring Beneficence/Nonmaleficence
66(1)
3.2.3 Relational Integrity
67(4)
3.2.4 Respect for the Dignity and Rights of Persons and People
71(2)
3.2.5 Promoting and Acting from Justice in Society
73(2)
3.3 The Five Proposed Supplementary Psychological Ethical Principles and Their Sub-principles
75(1)
3.4 Adopting a Systems Perspective (Ethics as System)
75(3)
3.5 Adopting a Scientific Perspective (Ethics as Science/Science as Ethics)
78(2)
3.6 Adopting a Legal Perspective (Ethics and Law)
80(2)
3.7 Abiding by Ethical Standards in Mental Health Testing and Evaluation (Ethics and Assessment Procedures (and Their Limits))
82(2)
3.8 Screening for and Detecting Problem Over- and Underreporting Biases (Ethics in Symptom/Performance Validity)
84(3)
3.9
Chapter Conclusion
87(6)
References
90(3)
4 Toward Revising the APA Ethics Code Standards
93(32)
4.1
Chapter Summary
93(1)
4.2 Introduction
93(5)
4.2.1 Comment
94(1)
4.2.2 Domains
95(1)
4.2.3 Factors
95(3)
4.3 Critiquing Extant Standards
98(1)
4.3.1 APA
98(1)
4.4 First APA Ethics Code Category of Standards: Resolving Ethical Issues
99(10)
4.4.1 Introduction
99(1)
4.4.2 Minor
100(4)
4.4.3 Major
104(5)
4.5 Standard 2: Competence
109(1)
4.6 Standard 3: Human Relations
110(3)
4.7 Standard 4: Privacy, Confidentiality [ and Informed Consent]
113(2)
4.8 Standard 5: Advertising/Public Statements
115(1)
4.9 Standard 6: Record Keeping/Fees
116(1)
4.10 Standard 7: Education/Training
116(1)
4.11 Standard 8: Research/Publication
117(2)
4.12 Standard 9: Assessment
119(1)
4.13 Standard 10: Therapy
120(1)
4.14
Chapter Conclusions
121(4)
References
123(2)
5 Examining Standards, Domains, Principles, and Meta-principles
125(28)
5.1
Chapter Summary
125(15)
5.1.1 CPA Standards
126(14)
5.1.2 Comment
140(1)
5.2 Domains and Principles
140(4)
5.2.1 Comment
144(1)
5.3 Meta-principles
144(5)
5.3.1 Introduction
144(1)
5.3.2 Theory
145(2)
5.3.3 Responsibility
147(1)
5.3.4 World View
148(1)
5.3.5 Meta-domains and Meta-standards
148(1)
5.4
Chapter Conclusion
149(4)
References
152(1)
6 Three Commentaries on Ethics and on the APA Ethics Code
153(32)
6.1
Chapter Summary
153(1)
6.2 Introduction
154(26)
6.2.1 Pope and Vasquez (2076)
156(6)
6.2.2 Koocher and Keith-Spiegel (2076)
162(14)
6.2.3 Fisher (2017)
176(4)
6.3
Chapter Conclusion
180(5)
References
181(4)
7 Lessons from the 2017 AMA Medical Ethics Code
185(28)
7.1
Chapter Summary
185(13)
7.1.1 Forward
186(1)
7.1.2 Preamble
186(3)
7.1.3 Opinions/Standards
189(1)
7.1.4 Principles
190(3)
7.1.5 Principles Elaborated
193(2)
7.1.6 Opinions
195(2)
7.1.7 Annotations
197(1)
7.2 Analysis of the
Chapters of the 2017 AMA Medical Ethics Code
198(11)
7.2.1 Introduction
198(1)
7.2.2 Numbering the Opinions
198(1)
7.2.3 Must, Should, May
199(1)
7.2.4 Opinions by
Chapter
200(9)
7.3 Conclusions on the 2017 AMA Medical Ethics Code
209(1)
7.4
Chapter Conclusions
210(3)
References
211(2)
8 Ethical Decision Making: Fallacies/Biases and Models
213(32)
8.1
Chapter Summary
213(1)
8.2 Ethical Decision Making: Fallacies/Biases and Heuristics
214(3)
8.2.1 Logical Fallacies/Biases
214(3)
8.3 Ethical Decision-Making Models and an Integrated Model
217(16)
8.3.1 Steps
221(12)
8.4 A Model of 35 Steps in Seven Phases in Ethical Decision-Making
233(8)
8.4.1 Phases
233(8)
8.5
Chapter Conclusions
241(4)
References
242(3)
9 Participatory Ethics, Psychological Co-regulation, and Recommendations
245(25)
9.1
Chapter Summary
245(1)
9.2 Philosophical Ethics
246(6)
9.2.1 Models
246(2)
9.2.2 Commentary
248(4)
9.3 The Psychology of Ethics
252(13)
9.3.1 Introduction
252(4)
9.3.2 Psychological Co-Regulation
256(4)
9.3.3 The Ethical System in Revising/Creating Mental Health Ethics Codes
260(3)
9.3.4 Ethical Thinking
263(2)
9.4
Chapter Conclusions
265(5)
Appendix: Case Illustrations and Ethical Decision Making
270(15)
Introduction
270(1)
Vignette 1
271(2)
Vignette 2
273(3)
Vignette 3
276(5)
References
281(4)
Index 285
Gerald Young, Ph.D., C. Psych., is a Full Professor, in the Department of Psychology, Glendon College, York University, Toronto, Canada. He is the sole author or senior editor/ co-author of seven books, including on malingering (Malingering, Feigning, and Response Bias in Psychiatric/ Psychological Injury, published by Springer SBM, New York, 2014). For the area of psychological injury and law, he is the first to have organized (a) a scientific association [ www.asapil.net], and (b) an academic journal [ Psychological Injury and Law [ PIL, springer.com], and (c) he has written integrative articles in multiple journals on the topic. His other books include Development and Causality: Neo-Piagetian Perspectives (Springer SBM, 2011) and Unifying Psychology and Causality (Springer International Publishing, 2016). His most recent book is the present one on Toward Revising the APA Ethics Code (2017). He has successfully testified in a case involving the Supreme Court of Canada on the rights of injured workers. He has won awards for his work from both the American and Canadian Psychological Associations, including for lifetime contributions.