Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

El. knyga: Rightful Relations with Distant Strangers: Kant, the Eu, and the Wider World

(University of Sussex, UK)
  • Formatas: 296 pages
  • Serija: Law and Practical Reason
  • Išleidimo metai: 25-Mar-2021
  • Leidėjas: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-13: 9781509941322
  • Formatas: 296 pages
  • Serija: Law and Practical Reason
  • Išleidimo metai: 25-Mar-2021
  • Leidėjas: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-13: 9781509941322

DRM apribojimai

  • Kopijuoti:

    neleidžiama

  • Spausdinti:

    neleidžiama

  • El. knygos naudojimas:

    Skaitmeninių teisių valdymas (DRM)
    Leidykla pateikė šią knygą šifruota forma, o tai reiškia, kad norint ją atrakinti ir perskaityti reikia įdiegti nemokamą programinę įrangą. Norint skaityti šią el. knygą, turite susikurti Adobe ID . Daugiau informacijos  čia. El. knygą galima atsisiųsti į 6 įrenginius (vienas vartotojas su tuo pačiu Adobe ID).

    Reikalinga programinė įranga
    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą mobiliajame įrenginyje (telefone ar planšetiniame kompiuteryje), turite įdiegti šią nemokamą programėlę: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą asmeniniame arba „Mac“ kompiuteryje, Jums reikalinga  Adobe Digital Editions “ (tai nemokama programa, specialiai sukurta el. knygoms. Tai nėra tas pats, kas „Adobe Reader“, kurią tikriausiai jau turite savo kompiuteryje.)

    Negalite skaityti šios el. knygos naudodami „Amazon Kindle“.

This book provides a philosophical critique of legal relations between the EU and distant strangers neither located within, nor citizens of, its Member States. Starting with the EUs commitment in Articles 3(5) and 21 TEU to advance democracy, human rights, and the rule of law in all its relations with the wider world, Ganesh examines in detail the salient EU and international legal materials and thereafter critiques them in the light of a theory of just global legal relations derived from Kants philosophy of right. In so doing, Ganesh departs from comparable Kantian scholarship on the EU by centering the discussion not around the essay Toward Perpetual Peace, but around the Doctrine of Right, Kants final and comprehensive statement of his general theory of law.

The book thus sheds light on areas of EU law (EU external relations law, standing to bring judicial review), public international law (jurisdiction, global public goods) and human rights (human rights jurisdiction), and also critiques the widespread identification of the EU as a Kantian federation of peace.

The thesis on which this book was based was awarded the 2020 René Cassin Thesis Prize (English section).

Recenzijos

The book is very well-written, and the arguments flow interestingly, creating a novel narrative through which to discuss the legal role of the EU in the contemporary world Dr Ganeshs book offers a much welcome refreshing view and analysis. -- André Nunes Chaib, Maastricht University * EU Law Live * Ganesh has managed to deliver a highly original account of both jurisdiction in international and EU law, and of Kantian legal philosophy. His book offers an insightful theorization of the EU and its role in the world and at the same time an often harsh (but all too justified) critique of the ways in which that role is given shape. * Common Market Law Review *

Daugiau informacijos

This book considers a normative theory of rightful relations between a political community and distant strangers, non-members located outside the territory.
1. Introduction
I. Force, Freedom and Formality: Kants Philosophy of Right
II. Methodology: Immanent Critique and Private Law Analogies
III. Outline of the Book
IV. Conclusion

2. Territorial Extension: Power and Authority in the Wider World
I. The Post-Lisbon Articles
A. Between Multilateralism and Evangelism
II. Bartels and the Compliance Interpretation
A. Human Rights Jurisdiction
B. Jurisdiction under General International Law
C. Standing
III. Legal Effects and the Spatial Scope of EU Law
A. Defending Air Transport: Emerging Explanations and Forgotten Precedents
B. Fluctuat nec mergitur: The Lotus Case in CJEU Jurisprudence
IV. Power and Authority: A Subtle Difference
A. The Nature of Territorial Extension
V. Conclusion

3. The Missionary Principle: A False Start
I. The Sovereign Trusteeship of Humanity
II. Harms and Wrongs
A. Public Actors and Human Rights Jurisdiction
B. The Failure of the Argument from Well-Being
III. Blurred Frontiers: Values and Constitutional Objectives
A. Policy Consistency/Coherence in the Light of EU Constitutional Objectives

B. The Missionary Principle and Territorial Extension
IV. Conclusion: Dignity as Independence

4. Kants International Legal Order and the Forms of Private Law
I. Private Right: The Building Blocks of Kants General Theory of Law
A. The Division of Torts: Damage and Injury
B. The Three Defects in the State of Nature
C. Legislating on Property and Personality
II. Public Right: The Fiduciary State
A. The Separate, Public Person of the State
B. Human Rights and the Fiduciary State
III. International Law: Property and Personality
A. Territory: Property or Body?
B. No Property, Only Personality
IV. Conclusion

5. Extraterritorial Jurisdiction to Provide Global Public Goods
I. Ripsteins Roads
A. Expanding the Concept: Other Public Goods
B. Limitations upon the Right to Provide Public Goods
II. Global Public Goods
A. The Right to Regulate Global Public Goods
B. The Irrelevance of Harm
C. Public Purpose and Necessity
III. Appraising the EU
IV. Conclusion

6. Extraterritorial Human Rights Obligations
I. Human Rights as Public Fiduciary Rights
A. Moral Theories of Human Rights Law 6
B. Human Rights as Legal and Directed all the Way Down
C. Human Rights as Rights and as Philanthropy
II. Authority and Human Rights Jurisdiction
A. Capability
B. Control
C. Arendts Loophole
III. Territorial Extension and Human Rights Jurisdiction
IV. Conclusion

7. Closing the Courthouse Door: The Standing of Distant Strangers
I. Standing in EU Law
A. The Requirement of Legal Effects
B. Direct and Individual Concern under Article 263 TFEU
II. The EU-Morocco Agreements: Trustees de son tort of Humanity
III. Polisario and Western Sahara Campaign
A. Case T-512/12 Front Polisario v Council The General Court Decision
B. Case C-104/16 Council v Front Polisario Before the ECJ
C. Case C-266/16 Western Sahara Campaign The Preliminary Reference
IV. Conclusion

8. General Conclusion
I. Are the EUs Unilateral Assertions of Authority over Distant Strangers
Defensible?
II. Does the EU Owe Obligations towards Distant Strangers over whom it Claims
Authority?
III. If So, does the EU Fulfil them?
Aravind Ganesh is Postdoctoral Researcher in International and Comparative Law at Maastricht University, the Netherlands.