Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Science, Ideology, and the Media: The Cyril Burt Scandal [Minkštas viršelis]

  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 448 pages, aukštis x plotis: 229x152 mm, weight: 589 g
  • Išleidimo metai: 30-Dec-2013
  • Leidėjas: Routledge
  • ISBN-10: 1412852749
  • ISBN-13: 9781412852746
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 448 pages, aukštis x plotis: 229x152 mm, weight: 589 g
  • Išleidimo metai: 30-Dec-2013
  • Leidėjas: Routledge
  • ISBN-10: 1412852749
  • ISBN-13: 9781412852746
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
In 1976, five years after his death, serious charges were leveled against the distinguished British scientist Sir Cyril Burt. His research on the nature of intelligence was challenged as fraudulent by a number of respected commentators, among them Leon Kamin, Oliver Gillie, Ann and Alan Clarke, and Leslie Hearnshaw. The evidence they marshaled, and the charges themselves are examined here in scrupulous detail. Written as a straightforward defense of Burt, this volume also tells a second story: the intrusion of the mass media into science, the power of the new media, and the success of this invasion, which threatens to replace intellectual authority.

Convinced that a great injustice had been done, Fletcher examines each of the charges in detail, subjecting each of Burt's detractors to a symbolic cross-examination. He exposes carelessness and errors of interpretation, and reveals areas of evidence the critics failed to take into account. Each interrogation ends with a list of questions that call for clear public answer. Fletcher's closing argument calls for the restoration of Burt's reputation, so that justice is done.

The broader significance of this case study goes far beyond the Burt controversy itself, and has implications for the conduct of science in an increasingly contentious social environment. Fletcher describes how ideology, in alliance with a receptive popular journalism and the media, is able to establish itself as a powerful third force in scientific discourse. The Burt Affair demonstrates what happens when the media establish a viewpoint that permeates not only the scientific community, but also entrenches that perspective so thoroughly in public understanding that its assumptions are not even questioned.
Acknowledgments xiii
Preface xvii
I CASE FOR THE DEFENSE
1 Preamble
3(18)
Introduction
3(1)
Approach
4(3)
Jury
7(1)
Prosecution
8(1)
Cross-Examination
9(2)
Fraud? True or False?
11(1)
Rehabilitation?
12(5)
Relevance?
17(4)
II WITNESSES FOR THE PROSECUTION CROSS-EXAMINATION
Introduction
21(2)
2 The BBC: The Intelligence Man
23(18)
The Billing
23(2)
Misrepresentations
25(2)
Indefensible Judgments
27(3)
A Disallowing and Rejection of All Qualifications
30(2)
Dramatized Incidents and Scenes: Evidence?
32(3)
Did You See?
35(1)
Conclusion
36(1)
Questions Requiring Public Answers
37(2)
Notes
39(2)
3 Professor Leon Kamin
41(40)
General Charges
43(4)
The 1943 Paper "Ability and Income"
47(21)
The "Invariant Correlations"
68(8)
Errors of Carelessness, in Haste? Or Deliberate Misrepresentations?
76(2)
Questions Requiring Public Answers
78(1)
Notes
79(2)
4 Dr. Oliver Gillie and the Press
81(34)
The Most Sensational Charge of Fraud This Century
82(1)
Race and Eugenics
83(3)
The Mentally Subnormal: The Wood Report
86(4)
Guessing the IQs of Adults
90(1)
The Missing Ladies---and Parapsychology
91(10)
The Invariant Correlations and Working Backwards
101(3)
"Early Plagiarism to Outright Fraud"
104(2)
General Denunciations
106(6)
Questions Requiring Public Answers
112(1)
Notes
113(2)
5 The Clarkes and Hull
115(20)
Collaboration in the Public Charge of Fraud
115(1)
The Famous Articles
116(11)
Beyond Hearnshaw: The "Confidence Trickster"
127(3)
"A Poor Applied Psychologist"
130(2)
Questions Requiring Public Answers
132(1)
Notes
132(3)
6 Professor Leslie S. Hearnshaw: The Official Biography
135(36)
A Critic of Burt's Detractors
136(5)
The Charges
141(1)
The Biography
142(1)
Misrepresenting Dr. Marion Burt
143(3)
Burt's Supporters: Ignored and Excluded
146(4)
The Diaries: "Decisive Evidence"
150(2)
Spearman and the History of Factor Analysis
152(4)
Dorfman and Stigler on Burt's Statistics
156(5)
The Journal and Burt's Editorial Practices
161(4)
Strange Conjectures
165(1)
Inordinate Language
166(2)
Questions Requiring Public Answers
168(1)
Notes
169(2)
7 Professors Jensen and Eysenck
171(16)
Questions Requiring Public Answers
183(3)
Notes
186(1)
8 The Sociologists of Education
187(60)
A Final Allegation
187(2)
The Caricatures: An Introduction
189(5)
Heredity and Environment: Burt
194(13)
Heredity and Environment: The Sociologists of Education
207(30)
Social Mobility: David Glass
211(4)
Social Class and Educational Opportunity: Floud, Halsey, and Martin
215(7)
The Home and the School: J.W.B. Douglas
222(8)
The Sociology of Language: Basil Bernstein
230(7)
Conclusion
237(6)
Notes
243(4)
9 Final Summary Note
247(4)
III MALFEASANCE AND FRAUD? Summing Up, Additional Evidence, and Verdict
10 Malfeasance?
251(8)
Eugenics
251(1)
Racism
252(1)
Social Class
252(1)
Intelligence and Income
252(1)
Heredity and Environment
253(1)
Right-Wing Elitism
253(1)
Dedication and Obsession
254(1)
Data, Sources, Methods of Investigation
254(3)
Confidence Trickster and Psychopath
257(1)
Note
258(1)
11 Fraud? The Minor Charges
259(6)
Guessing the IQs of Adults and Parents
259(1)
Working Backwards to Invented Data
260(2)
Falsifying the History of Factor Analysis
262(3)
12 Fraud? The Major Charges
265(44)
The Missing Ladies
266(10)
Authorship and Pseudonyms
276(7)
The Fabrication of Evidence
283(11)
The Invariant Correlations
294(1)
Initial Summary of Cross-Examination
294(2)
The 1966 Table: Facts and Questions
296(10)
Writing and Revision: Dates and Circumstances
298(2)
Columns and Correlations
300(1)
Physical Measurements
301(1)
Totals and Calculations: Confusion
301(1)
Misprints?
302(1)
Haste
303(1)
Direction of Errors
304(1)
The Vulnerability of Exactitude
304(1)
Age
305(1)
Notes
306(3)
13 Verdict
309(52)
Fraud? Guilty or Not Guilty?
309(8)
The Initial Focus on Twins
309(1)
The Extension of the Charges
310(1)
Cross-Examination: A Testimony of Inaccuracy and Vilification
310(1)
Stridency and Intemperate Language
311(1)
A Testimony Lacking Credibility
312(1)
The Minor Charges Dismissed
312(1)
The Major Charges Dismissed
313(1)
Judgment
314(3)
IV QUESTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
14 Remaining Considerations
317(1)
Flaws and Faults?
317(3)
Explanations?
320(15)
Vanity
320(4)
Pseudologica Phantastica
324(11)
Burt's Detractors
335(7)
Rehabilitation and Contemporary Relevance
342(17)
Notes
359(2)
Appendix 1 Tests Employed 361(14)
Appendix 2 Dr. Banks' Criticisms of Hearnshaw 375(4)
Appendix 3 The 53 Pairs of Twins: Additional Information 379(6)
Appendix 4 Testimony for the Defense: Supplementary Evidence 385(20)
Select Bibliography 405(8)
Index 413
Ronald Fletcher