Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

El. knyga: Searching Minds by Scanning Brains: Neuroscience Technology and Constitutional Privacy Protection

Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
Searching Minds by Scanning Brains: Neuroscience Technology and Constitutional Privacy ProtectionDidesnis paveikslėlis
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:

DRM apribojimai

  • Kopijuoti:

    neleidžiama

  • Spausdinti:

    neleidžiama

  • El. knygos naudojimas:

    Skaitmeninių teisių valdymas (DRM)
    Leidykla pateikė šią knygą šifruota forma, o tai reiškia, kad norint ją atrakinti ir perskaityti reikia įdiegti nemokamą programinę įrangą. Norint skaityti šią el. knygą, turite susikurti Adobe ID . Daugiau informacijos  čia. El. knygą galima atsisiųsti į 6 įrenginius (vienas vartotojas su tuo pačiu Adobe ID).

    Reikalinga programinė įranga
    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą mobiliajame įrenginyje (telefone ar planšetiniame kompiuteryje), turite įdiegti šią nemokamą programėlę: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą asmeniniame arba „Mac“ kompiuteryje, Jums reikalinga  Adobe Digital Editions “ (tai nemokama programa, specialiai sukurta el. knygoms. Tai nėra tas pats, kas „Adobe Reader“, kurią tikriausiai jau turite savo kompiuteryje.)

    Negalite skaityti šios el. knygos naudodami „Amazon Kindle“.

This book examines the ethical and legal challenges presented by modern techniques of memory retrieval, especially within the context of potential use by the US government in courts of law. Specifically, Marc Blitz discusses the Fourth Amendment"s protections against unreasonable searches and the Fifth Amendment"s self-incrimination clause. He also argues that we should pay close attention to another constitutional provision that individuals generally don"t think of as protecting their privacy: The First Amendment"s freedom of speech. First Amendment values also protect our freedom of thought, and this-not simply our privacy-is what is at stake if government engaged in excessive monitoring of our minds.

1. Introduction 2. Constitutional Puzzles (and (Neuro)technological Changes 3. Lie Detection, Mind Reading, and Brain Reading 4. The Fifth Amendment: Self-Incrimination and the Brain 5. The Fourth (and First) Amendment 6. Conclusion

Recenzijos

Searching Minds by Scanning Brains presents in-depth discussions of how the Fourth and Fifth Amendments have been used to make decisions about the constitutionality of brain scanning offered as evidence in criminal cases. This book could be a very helpful text for law students, not only because of the resources and format of the book but also because of Blitzs modeling of the disciplined logical and balanced thinking of an expert legal scholar. (Patricia E. Freed, PsycCRITIQUES, Vol. 62 (32), August, 2017)

1 Introduction
1(10)
2 Constitutional Puzzles and (Neuro) Technological Changes
11(34)
Video Cameras, Parrots, and Brains
17(9)
A Brief Tour of the Constitutional Privacy Landscape --- and Neuroimaging's Possible Place in It
26(7)
The First Amendment, Externalized Thought, and "Freedom of Mind"
33(6)
Futuristic Thinking
39(6)
3 Lie Detection, Mind Reading, and Brain Reading
45(14)
Lie Detection Before Neuroimaging: Polygraph Tests
45(4)
Lie Detection with Neuroimaging: Methods of Monitoring the Brain in Action
49(6)
Neuroimaging Beyond Lie Detection: Screening Movies from the Mind
55(4)
4 The Fifth Amendment: Self-incrimination and the Brain
59(22)
An Overview: Why Neuroimaging Raises Fifth Amendment Problems
60(1)
The Purposes of the Self-incrimination Clause
61(3)
Applying Excuse-Based Theory of Self-incrimination
64(5)
An Approach Based on Cognitive Content --- and Some Questions About its Scope
69(7)
A Biological Buffer Zone for Mental Privacy
76(5)
5 The Fourth (and First) Amendment: Searches with, and Scrutiny of, Neuroimaging
81(44)
An Overview: Why Neuroimaging Raises Fourth Amendment Problems
81(6)
Fourth Amendment Coverage --- and Kyllo V. United States
87(6)
Fourth Amendment Coverage --- and Third Party Doctrine and Abandonment
93(7)
Fourth Amendment Coverage --- and Perfectly Efficient Search Technology
100(3)
Fourth Amendment Protection --- and the Importance of Balancing
103(2)
Fourth Amendment Protection --- Warrantless Searches, and Problems with Balancing
105(3)
Fourth Amendment Protection --- Two Possible Alternatives to the Status Quo
108(3)
Fourth Amendment Protection and First Amendment Procedures --- A Third Alternative to the Status Quo
111(4)
Fourth Amendment Protection --- Beyond the Warrant Requirement
115(6)
Intellectual Property and Intellectual Privacy
121(4)
6 Conclusion
125(4)
References 129(8)
Index 137(4)
Name Index 141(2)
Court Cases 143
Marc Jonathan Blitz is Alan Joseph Bennett Professor of Law at Oklahoma City University, USA, and series editor of Palgrave Studies in Law, Neuroscience, and Human Behavior.
Daugiau apie elektronines knygas Daugiau apie elektronines knygas
Pastovi nuoroda: https://www.kriso.lt/db/97833195000416e.html
Raktažodžiai: