List of figures |
|
xiii | |
List of tables |
|
xiv | |
List of images |
|
xv | |
List of cases |
|
xvi | |
Preface |
|
xvii | |
Acknowledgements |
|
xix | |
Part 1 Social media law and risk management: introduction and context |
|
1 | (32) |
|
1 Introduction - defining the boundaries of the theory and practice of social media risk |
|
|
3 | (9) |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
|
5 | (3) |
|
Case Study 1.1 - Indian Ocean tsunami |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
Case Study 1.2 - Christchurch terror attack |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
Case Study 1.3 - Footballer's posts case: Folau v Rugby Australia |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
Understanding risk: ethical, legal and organisational |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
Theoretical underpinnings |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
Discussion questions and project topics |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
2 Theory into practice: why is stakeholder theory important? |
|
|
12 | (10) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (3) |
|
Case Study 2.1 - Heart Foundation of Australia's 'Heartless words' campaign |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
Understanding stakeholder theory |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
How to identify stakeholders |
|
|
18 | (2) |
|
Case Study 2.2 - #AskJameis |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
Discussion questions and project topics |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
|
20 | (2) |
|
3 Risk management theories and practice in social media |
|
|
22 | (11) |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
Historical development of risk management |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
Perception of risk and outrage factors |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
Social amplification of risk framework and the role of social media |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
Case Study 3.1 - The Crock-Pot case |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
Legal risk and escalation policies |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
When theories meet: risk management in a stakeholder theory context |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
Discussion questions and project topics |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
31 | (2) |
Part 2 Social media attributes contributing to opportunity and risk |
|
33 | (28) |
|
4 The role of the audience: embracing the opportunities social media presents |
|
|
35 | (11) |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
Finding the right platform |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
Ways to engage your audience |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
Influencers, celebrity and endorsement |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
Case Study 4.1 - 'Your Army Needs You' campaign |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
Case Study 4.2 - Queensland Police Service social media use |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
Case Study 4.3 - Starbucks #whatsyourname campaign |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
Stakeholder theory and the audience |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
Discussion questions and project topics |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
5 Managing legal risk in a wired world: general and specific approaches to minimising damage for stakeholders |
|
|
46 | (15) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
Defining social media law and legal risk |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
Communication and social media law in historical context |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
Strategies for minimising legal risk: general and specific approaches for analysis |
|
|
48 | (5) |
|
Key legal areas of risk with social media |
|
|
53 | (2) |
|
Jurisdiction: legal implications of a globalised and interconnected world |
|
|
55 | (2) |
|
Case Study 5.1 - Legal risk of political speech in the United States versus Australia |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
Case Study 5.2 - The Volvo photo shoot case |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
Stakeholder theory and social media law |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
Discussion questions and project topics |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
|
59 | (2) |
Part 3 Brand and reputational opportunity and risk |
|
61 | (28) |
|
6 Brand, reputational management and defamation on social media |
|
|
63 | (14) |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
Defining brand, reputation and defamation |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
Brand and reputation on social media: pluses and pitfalls |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
Strategies for managing brand and reputation on social media |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
Defamation as the legal action over reputational damage |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
Defamation in an international context: jurisdictional issues |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
Elements of a defamation action |
|
|
68 | (2) |
|
Common defences to defamation |
|
|
70 | (2) |
|
Strategies for minimising defamation risk |
|
|
72 | (3) |
|
Case Study 6.1 - Are you responsible for defamatory comments by other people on your organisation's Facebook page? |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
Case Study 6.2 - The Cyprus property case: defamation action might not restore a reputation |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
Stakeholder theory and reputational management |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
Discussion questions and project topics |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
7 Crisis communication and reporting |
|
|
77 | (12) |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
Crisis communication theory |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
Social media and crisis management |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
Crisis communication planning |
|
|
81 | (2) |
|
Case Study 7.1 - Southwest Airlines mid-flight emergency |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
|
83 | (3) |
|
Case Study 7.2 - American Red Cross rogue tweet - #gettingslizzerd |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
Case Study 7.3 - United Airlines passenger removal |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
Stakeholder theory and crisis management |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
Discussion questions and project topics |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
|
87 | (2) |
Part 4 Risks at the intersection of human rights, law and ethics |
|
89 | (28) |
|
8 Privacy in social media |
|
|
91 | (12) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
Dining privacy, confidentiality and data protection on social media |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
Privacy: historical and global perspectives |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
Legal, ethical and regulatory dimensions |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
Elements of breach of privacy and confidentiality actions |
|
|
95 | (2) |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
Strategies for minimising privacy risk |
|
|
98 | (2) |
|
Case Study 8.1 - Facebook and the 'This Is Your Digital Life' app |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
Case Study 8.2 - Using consumer law to combat revenge porn |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
Stakeholder theory and privacy |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
Discussion questions and project topics |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
9 See you in court: fair coverage versus a fair trial |
|
|
103 | (14) |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
Contested space: the intersection between the courts and social media |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
Fundamental rights at issue |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
Open justice and social media |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
Varieties of contempt of court |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
Prejudicial publicity on social media - sub judice contempt |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
Breaching suppression orders |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
Social media in the courtroom - tweeting, blogging and court communication |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
National security laws and secret trials |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
Strategies for minimising risk with crime, contempt and the courts |
|
|
110 | (3) |
|
Case Study 9.1 - The Yahoo! 7 contempt case |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
Case Study 9.2 - The Facebook streaming case |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
Stakeholder theory and court-oriented social media |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
Discussion questions and project topics |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
|
115 | (2) |
Part 5 Legal risks of social media in business |
|
117 | (41) |
|
10 Employment law - private versus professional social media risk |
|
|
119 | (11) |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
Employment law - what is it and why is it important? |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
Does private communication on social media really exist? |
|
|
120 | (3) |
|
Case Study 10.1 -Justine Sacco and her viral tweet |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
Corporate governance - social media policy or code of conduct |
|
|
123 | (2) |
|
Case Study 10.2 - Michaela Banerji and her anonymous tweets |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
Employees as ambassadors or advocates |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
Case Study 10.3 - Paris Brown - how past social media posts can destroy a job offer |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
Stakeholder theory and employment law |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
Discussion questions and project topics |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
|
128 | (2) |
|
11 Business, corporate and consumer law and social media |
|
|
130 | (14) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
Mapping the terrain of risk with business laws on social media |
|
|
131 | (2) |
|
Misleading and deceptive conduct |
|
|
133 | (2) |
|
Securities laws and social media |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
Special industry-based restrictions: health, drugs, alcohol, tobacco and gambling |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
Organisational responsibility for the comments of others on its social media sites |
|
|
137 | (2) |
|
Case Study 11.1 - Allergy Pathway, consumer law and liability for third party comments |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
Case Study 11.2 - Urthbox and the misleading reviews |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
Strategies for minimising risks with consumer and business laws |
|
|
139 | (2) |
|
Stakeholder theory and business laws |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
Discussion questions and project topics |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
12 Intellectual property law and plagiarism |
|
|
144 | (14) |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
Intellectual property and plagiarism - where law and ethics meet on social media |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
Ethical dimensions via plagiarism - borrowing and stealing the work of others |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
A quick introduction to intellectual property law |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
Breach of copyright - elements and pitfalls |
|
|
147 | (2) |
|
Free use, fair use and fair dealing exceptions |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
Moral rights, personality rights and passing off |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
Beware the cybersquatters |
|
|
151 | (3) |
|
Case Study 12.1 - Naruto Monkey case: monkey see, monkey do! |
|
|
151 | (2) |
|
Case Study 12.2 - #WTForever21 case |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
Strategies for minimising risks with intellectual property |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
Stakeholder theory and intellectual property |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
Discussion questions and project topics |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
|
157 | (1) |
Appendix: Further social media law resources |
|
158 | (11) |
Index |
|
169 | |