|
|
xii | |
|
|
xiii | |
Acknowledgements |
|
xv | |
|
|
xvi | |
|
|
1 | (15) |
|
1.1 Teaching Directive Speech Acts: Is There Room for Improvement? |
|
|
1 | (4) |
|
|
5 | (5) |
|
|
10 | (3) |
|
|
13 | (3) |
|
2 What Contemporary Research Tells Us about Speech Acts |
|
|
16 | (53) |
|
2.1 Speech Acts: The Player All Linguistic Theories Want in Their Team |
|
|
16 | (2) |
|
2.2 Team 1. Codification-Based Theories and the Over-Grammaticalisation of Speech Acts |
|
|
18 | (5) |
|
2.2.1 Weaknesses of the Literal Force Hypothesis and Ross's Performative Hypothesis |
|
|
18 | (2) |
|
2.2.2 Halliday's Over-Grammaticalisation of Speech Acts |
|
|
20 | (3) |
|
2.3 Team 2. Convention-Based Theories: Indirect Speech Acts |
|
|
23 | (4) |
|
2.3.1 Searle: Inference and Convention in Speech Acts |
|
|
23 | (3) |
|
2.3.2 Morgan's Conventions of Usage and Short-Circuiting Implicatures |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
2.4 Team 3. Inference-Based Theories: Over-Pragmatisation of Speech Acts |
|
|
27 | (8) |
|
2.4.1 Standard Pragmatics Approach: Bach and Harnish's Speech Act Schemas |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
2.4.2 Direct Access Approaches I: Leech's Interpersonal Rhetoric |
|
|
29 | (3) |
|
2.4.3 Direct Access Approaches II: Conversational Approaches |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
2.5 A Cognitive-Constructional Approach to Directive Speech Acts |
|
|
35 | (34) |
|
2.5.1 What Experimental Linguistics Has Revealed about Speech Act Processing |
|
|
35 | (4) |
|
2.5.2 Redefining the Literal Force Hypothesis in terms of Sentence Type/Speech Act Compatibility |
|
|
39 | (4) |
|
2.5.3 Revisiting the Notions of Direct and Indirect Speech Acts |
|
|
43 | (5) |
|
2.5.4 Constraining Inferences via Cognitive Operations: Conceptual Metonymy |
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
2.5.5 Illocutionary Idealised Cognitive Models and (Multiple Source)-in-Target Metonymies |
|
|
50 | (10) |
|
2.5.6 Assembling the Illocutionary Puzzle: Families of Illocutionary Constructions |
|
|
60 | (9) |
|
3 Critical Assessment of the Representation of Speech Acts in Advanced EFL Textbooks |
|
|
69 | (19) |
|
3.1 Analytical Categories and Corpus of Textbooks for Analysis |
|
|
70 | (3) |
|
3.2 Quantitative Assessment of the Treatment of Directive Speech Acts in Advanced EFL Textbooks |
|
|
73 | (4) |
|
3.3 Qualitative Assessment of the Treatment of Directive Speech Acts in Advanced EFL Textbooks |
|
|
77 | (8) |
|
3.3.1 Inclusion of Semantic/Pragmatic Information about Speech Acts |
|
|
77 | (3) |
|
3.3.2 Treatment of the Constructional Nature of Directive Speech Acts |
|
|
80 | (2) |
|
3.3.3 Treatment of Conversational Aspects of Directive Speech Acts |
|
|
82 | (2) |
|
3.3.4 Treatment of Cross-Cultural and Cross-Linguistic Areas of Discrepancy between L1 and L2 |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
3.4 Conclusions and Way Forward: Explicit Instruction through a Corpus-Based Cognitive Pedagogical Grammar |
|
|
85 | (3) |
|
4 A Cognitive Pedagogical Grammar of Directive Speech Acts I: Know-What and Know-How of Directives |
|
|
88 | (95) |
|
|
89 | (13) |
|
4.1.1 The Know-What of Orders |
|
|
90 | (6) |
|
4.1.2 The Know-How of Orders |
|
|
96 | (6) |
|
|
102 | (18) |
|
4.2.1 The Know-What of Requests |
|
|
103 | (7) |
|
4.2.2 The Know-How of Requests |
|
|
110 | (10) |
|
|
120 | (16) |
|
4.3.1 The Know-What of Beggings |
|
|
123 | (7) |
|
4.3.2 The Know-How of Beggings |
|
|
130 | (6) |
|
|
136 | (16) |
|
4.4.1 The Know-What of Suggestions |
|
|
137 | (6) |
|
4.4.2 The Know-How of Suggestions |
|
|
143 | (9) |
|
|
152 | (17) |
|
4.5.1 The Know-What of Advice Acts |
|
|
152 | (7) |
|
4.5.2 The Know-How of Advice Acts |
|
|
159 | (10) |
|
|
169 | (14) |
|
4.6.1 The Know-What of Warnings |
|
|
170 | (7) |
|
4.6.2 The Know-How of Warnings |
|
|
177 | (6) |
|
5 A Cognitive Pedagogical Grammar of Directive Speech Acts II: Activities and Practice Materials |
|
|
183 | (35) |
|
5.1 Teaching the Know-What of Directives |
|
|
186 | (10) |
|
5.2 Teaching the Know-How of Directives |
|
|
196 | (12) |
|
5.3 Teaching Cross-Cultural and Cross-Linguistic Issues of Directives |
|
|
208 | (10) |
|
|
218 | (11) |
References |
|
229 | (17) |
Index |
|
246 | |