Foreword |
|
vii | |
Preface |
|
ix | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xi | |
|
|
1 | (16) |
|
|
2 | (5) |
|
Location of genetic information |
|
|
2 | (3) |
|
Interpretation of genetic information |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
Translation of genetic information |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
Transmission of genetic information |
|
|
7 | (3) |
|
Variations in genetic information |
|
|
10 | (5) |
|
Individual differences in genetic information |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
|
11 | (4) |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
|
17 | (26) |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
|
19 | (5) |
|
Autosomal dominant inheritance |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
Autosomal recessive inheritance |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
X-chromosomal dominant inheritance |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
X-chromosomal recessive inheritance |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
Y-chromosomal inheritance |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
Complications ofMendelian segregation |
|
|
24 | (10) |
|
Variable penetrance and expression |
|
|
25 | (2) |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
|
29 | (2) |
|
Phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
32 | (2) |
|
|
34 | (5) |
|
|
39 | (4) |
|
|
43 | (12) |
|
Properties of genetic markers |
|
|
43 | (5) |
|
|
48 | (4) |
|
Short tandem repeats (STRs) |
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) |
|
|
50 | (2) |
|
|
52 | (3) |
|
|
55 | (20) |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
Genotyping errors in pedigrees |
|
|
56 | (7) |
|
Frequency of genotyping errors |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
Reasons for genotyping errors |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
Checks for double recombinants |
|
|
61 | (2) |
|
Genotyping errors in population-based studies |
|
|
63 | (9) |
|
Causes of deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
Tests for deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for SNPs |
|
|
64 | (3) |
|
Tests for deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for STRs |
|
|
67 | (2) |
|
Tests for compatibility with Hardy-Weinberg for SNPs |
|
|
69 | (3) |
|
|
72 | (3) |
|
|
75 | (14) |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
|
76 | (4) |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
Correspondence between physical distance and map distance |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
Radiation hybrid distance |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
Linkage disequilibrium distance |
|
|
81 | (5) |
|
|
86 | (3) |
|
Model-based Linkage Analysis |
|
|
89 | (32) |
|
Linkage analysis between two genetic markers |
|
|
90 | (11) |
|
Linkage analysis in phase-known pedigrees |
|
|
90 | (4) |
|
Linkage analysis in phase-unknown pedigrees |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
Linkage analysis in pedigrees with missing genotypes |
|
|
95 | (6) |
|
Linkage analysis between a genetic marker and a disease |
|
|
101 | (11) |
|
Linkage analysis between a genetic marker and a disease in phase-known pedigrees |
|
|
101 | (4) |
|
Linkage analysis between a genetic marker and a disease in general cases |
|
|
105 | (5) |
|
Gain in information by genotyping additional individuals; power calculations |
|
|
110 | (2) |
|
Significance levels in linkage analysis |
|
|
112 | (4) |
|
|
116 | (5) |
|
Model-free Linkage Analysis |
|
|
121 | (34) |
|
The principle of similarity |
|
|
122 | (2) |
|
Mathematical foundation of affected sib-pair analysis |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
Common tests for affected sib-pair analysis |
|
|
125 | (12) |
|
The maximum LOD score and the triangle test |
|
|
126 | (5) |
|
Score- and Wald-type one-degree-of-freedom tests |
|
|
131 | (5) |
|
Affected sib-pair tests using alleles shared identical by state |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
Properties of affected sib-pair tests |
|
|
137 | (2) |
|
Sample size and power calculations for affected sib-pair studies |
|
|
139 | (7) |
|
|
139 | (3) |
|
Relationship between recurrence risk ratios and IBD probabilities |
|
|
142 | (2) |
|
Sample size and power calculations for the mean test using recurrence risk ratios |
|
|
144 | (2) |
|
Extensions to multiple marker loci |
|
|
146 | (2) |
|
Extension to large sibships |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
Extension to large pedigrees |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
Extensions of the affected sib-pair approach |
|
|
150 | (3) |
|
Covariates in affected sib-pair analyses |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
Multiple disease loci in affected sib-pair analyses |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
Estimating the position of the disease locus in affected sib-pair analyses |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
Typing unaffected relatives in sib-pair analyses |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
|
153 | (2) |
|
|
155 | (32) |
|
Quantitative versus qualitative traits |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
The Haseman-Elston method |
|
|
157 | (10) |
|
The simple Falconer model |
|
|
159 | (2) |
|
The expected squared phenotypic difference at the trait locus |
|
|
161 | (2) |
|
The expected squared phenotypic difference at the marker locus |
|
|
163 | (4) |
|
Extensions of the Haseman-Elston method |
|
|
167 | (10) |
|
Double squared trait difference |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
Extension to large sibships |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
Haseman-Elston revisited and the new Haseman-Elston method |
|
|
169 | (4) |
|
Power and sample size calculations |
|
|
173 | (3) |
|
Further extensions of the Haseman-Elston method |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
Variance component models |
|
|
177 | (4) |
|
The univariate variance component model |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
The multivariate variance component model |
|
|
178 | (3) |
|
Random sib-pairs, extreme probands and extreme sib-pairs |
|
|
181 | (6) |
|
Empirical determination ofp-values |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
|
185 | (2) |
|
Fundamental Concepts of Association Analyses |
|
|
187 | (12) |
|
Introduction to association |
|
|
187 | (3) |
|
Principles of association |
|
|
187 | (2) |
|
Study designs for association |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
|
190 | (7) |
|
Measures for linkage disequilibrium |
|
|
190 | (4) |
|
Extent of linkage disequilibrium |
|
|
194 | (3) |
|
|
197 | (2) |
|
Association Analysis in Unrelated Individuals |
|
|
199 | (16) |
|
Selection of cases and controls |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
|
200 | (5) |
|
|
205 | (3) |
|
Population stratification |
|
|
208 | (5) |
|
Testing for population stratification |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
Comparison of structured association and genomic control |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
|
213 | (2) |
|
Family-based Association Analysis |
|
|
215 | (28) |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
Transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) |
|
|
217 | (4) |
|
Risk estimates for trio data |
|
|
221 | (2) |
|
Sample size and power calculations for the TDT |
|
|
223 | (1) |
|
Alternative test statistics |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
TDT for multiallelic markers |
|
|
225 | (3) |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
|
226 | (2) |
|
TDT type tests for different family structures |
|
|
228 | (11) |
|
TDT type tests for missing parental data |
|
|
229 | (2) |
|
TDT type tests for sibship data |
|
|
231 | (5) |
|
TDT type tests for extended pedigrees |
|
|
236 | (3) |
|
Association analysis for quantitative traits |
|
|
239 | (2) |
|
|
241 | (2) |
|
Haplotypes in Association Analyses |
|
|
243 | (20) |
|
Reasons for studying haplotypes |
|
|
244 | (1) |
|
|
245 | (5) |
|
Algorithms for haplotype assignment |
|
|
245 | (2) |
|
Algorithms for estimating haplotype probabilities |
|
|
247 | (3) |
|
Association tests using haplotypes |
|
|
250 | (2) |
|
Haplotype blocks and tagging SNPs |
|
|
252 | (9) |
|
Selection of markers by haplotypes |
|
|
254 | (3) |
|
Selection of markers by linkage disequilibrium |
|
|
257 | (2) |
|
Evaluation of marker selection approaches |
|
|
259 | (2) |
|
|
261 | (2) |
|
Appendix A Algorithms Used in Linkage Analyses |
|
|
263 | (14) |
|
A.1 The Lander-Green algorithm |
|
|
263 | (11) |
|
A.1.1 The inheritance vector at a single genetic marker |
|
|
264 | (4) |
|
A.1.2 The inheritance distribution given all genetic markers |
|
|
268 | (6) |
|
A.2 The Cardon-Fulker algorithm |
|
|
274 | (2) |
|
|
276 | (1) |
Solutions |
|
277 | (28) |
References |
|
305 | (24) |
Index |
|
329 | |