Acronyms |
|
xv | |
Executive Summary |
|
xix | |
In Remembrance |
|
xxiii | |
Summary |
|
1 | (16) |
|
Ambiguities and Functional Similarities Make Natural, Accidental, and Intentional Threats Different Manifestations of the Same Family of Challenges |
|
|
2 | (3) |
|
A Diverse Team of Organizations is Needed to Address the Complex Threat Landscape |
|
|
5 | (3) |
|
The Need to Anticipate, Detect, and Respond Rapidly to Threats |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
The Need for Geographic and Programmatic Flexibility |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
The Importance of Recruiting and Retaining the Most Effective BTRP Professionals |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
The Importance of Broader Awareness about BTRP's Experience and Expertise |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
The Strategic Vision for BTRP |
|
|
13 | (4) |
|
1 The History Of Cooperative Threat Reduction (1991-2018) |
|
|
17 | (18) |
|
Key Messages and Study Background |
|
|
17 | (3) |
|
Overview of the Evolution of Cooperative Threat Reduction |
|
|
20 | (3) |
|
The Origins of the Biological Threat Reduction Program: CTR 1.0 |
|
|
23 | (2) |
|
Taking Stock of the First 15 Years, and Planning Ahead to Biological Cooperative Threat Reduction: CTR 2.0 |
|
|
25 | (7) |
|
The Current Reality: BTRP Poised for CTR 3.0 |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
2 The Changing Biothreat Landscape |
|
|
35 | (34) |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
|
36 | (8) |
|
International Health Security Partners |
|
|
44 | (3) |
|
Data Sharing Relevant to Global Health Security |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
Security and Defense of Agriculture and Food Supplies |
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
|
50 | (4) |
|
Laboratory Synthesis of Pathogens |
|
|
54 | (2) |
|
|
56 | (3) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
Policy Framework for BTRP Planning and Investment |
|
|
60 | (6) |
|
Metrics and Evaluation for Biological Threat Reduction Programs |
|
|
66 | (3) |
|
3 Addressing Biothreats Through Successful Engagement |
|
|
69 | (26) |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
Benefits of Scientific Engagement to Biothreat Reduction |
|
|
69 | (4) |
|
|
73 | (4) |
|
Trusted Relationships are Critical to Success |
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
Learning from Disparate Experience |
|
|
79 | (16) |
|
4 Key Roles For The Department Of Defense In Biological Threat Reduction |
|
|
95 | (10) |
|
|
95 | (4) |
|
|
99 | (4) |
|
Support to and Coordination With DOD and Beyond |
|
|
103 | (2) |
|
5 Strategic Vision And The Way Forward |
|
|
105 | (20) |
|
Current Approaches of the Biological Threat Reduction Program |
|
|
105 | (19) |
|
The Strategic Vision for BTRP |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
6 Key Findings And Recommendations |
|
|
125 | (12) |
|
Authorities and Responsibilities |
|
|
126 | (2) |
|
BTRP In-Country Engagement |
|
|
128 | (3) |
|
Connecting BTRP With Others on Biological Threat Reduction |
|
|
131 | (6) |
References |
|
137 | (22) |
A Committee Biographies |
|
159 | (6) |
B Congressionally-Appropriated Funding For The Biological Threat Reduction Program (2007-2020) |
|
165 | (2) |
C U.S. And International Agencies And Organizations Engaged In Global Health Security |
|
167 | (1) |
U.S. Government Agencies |
|
167 | (3) |
International Governmental Efforts |
|
170 | (2) |
U.S. Organizations and Implementors |
|
172 | (1) |
International and Regional Organizations |
|
173 | |