In recent years, student feedback has appeared at the forefront of higher education quality. In particular, the issues of effectiveness and the use of student feedback to affect improvement in higher education teaching and learning, and also other areas of student tertiary experience. Despite this, there has been a relative lack of academic literature, especially in book format, focusing on the experiences of academics, higher education leaders and managers with expertise in this area. This comprehensive book addresses this gap.
With contributions by experts in the area of higher education quality (academics, higher education leaders and managers) from a range of countries the book is concerned with the practices and theory of evaluation in higher education quality, in particular the issue of student feedback.
|
List of figures and tables |
|
|
ix | |
About the authors |
|
xi | |
Preface |
|
xvii | |
|
|
|
1 The nexus of feedback and Improvement |
|
|
3 | (26) |
|
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
Preoccupation with surveys |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
Institution-level satisfaction |
|
|
9 | (3) |
|
Faculty-level satisfaction with provision |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
Programme-level satisfaction with the learning and teaching |
|
|
12 | (2) |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
Appraisal of teacher performance by students |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
Multiple surveys: cosmetic or inclusive? |
|
|
17 | (3) |
|
|
20 | (2) |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
|
24 | (5) |
|
Part 2 International Perspectives |
|
|
|
2 Student feedback In the US and global contexts |
|
|
29 | (20) |
|
|
|
29 | (3) |
|
Student feedback in the evaluation of academic programmes and instruction |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
33 | (2) |
|
|
35 | (5) |
|
The meta-profession model of faculty |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
|
44 | (5) |
|
3 Student feedback In higher education: a Malaysian perspective |
|
|
49 | (12) |
|
|
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
Malaysia's educational competitiveness ranking |
|
|
51 | (2) |
|
Student feedback in higher education |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
Student feedback in Malaysian universities |
|
|
54 | (2) |
|
Case study of a Malaysian university |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
Discussion and lessons learned |
|
|
57 | (2) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
4 Improving university teaching through student feedback: a critical Investigation |
|
|
61 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
|
62 | (4) |
|
Case study: student feedback at the Faculty of Engineering, Lund University |
|
|
66 | (3) |
|
Making strategic use of student evaluations |
|
|
69 | (3) |
|
|
72 | (4) |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
|
77 | (4) |
|
5 Student feedback in the Australian national and university context |
|
|
81 | (20) |
|
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
National or sector-wide use of student feedback |
|
|
82 | (6) |
|
Institutional-level use of student feedback |
|
|
88 | (2) |
|
Within-university practices and uses of student feedback |
|
|
90 | (4) |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
|
95 | (6) |
|
Part 3 Tools and Administration |
|
|
|
6 Tools for effective student feedback |
|
|
101 | (18) |
|
|
An assessment of student feedback instruments |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
Overview of selected assessments |
|
|
102 | (8) |
|
Connecting the dots: external and internal links |
|
|
110 | (5) |
|
Concluding thoughts on a more considered approach |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
|
116 | (3) |
|
7 Web-based or paper-based surveys: a quandary? |
|
|
119 | (14) |
|
|
|
|
119 | (2) |
|
Administrative considerations |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
|
122 | (2) |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
|
127 | (2) |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
|
130 | (3) |
|
8 Inclusive practice in student feedback systems |
|
|
133 | (10) |
|
|
|
|
|
133 | (2) |
|
Institutional approach to unit evaluation |
|
|
135 | (2) |
|
|
137 | (3) |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
|
141 | (2) |
|
9 Action and the feedback cycle |
|
|
143 | (16) |
|
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
|
144 | (4) |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
Managing student expectations |
|
|
149 | (4) |
|
|
153 | (2) |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
|
156 | |
|
|
156 | (4) |
Index |
|
159 | |
Professor Sid Nair is currently Executive Dean and Dean Learning, Teaching and Student Experience at the Victorian Institute of Technology (VIT), Australia where he is responsible for the learning, teaching, student experience and quality matters of the Institution.
Previous to this appointment at VIT, Sid was the Executive Director of the Tertiary Education Commission (TEC), Mauritius, the apex regulatory body where he was responsible for the formulation and execution of strategies, policies and procedures in the higher education sector in Mauritius.
Prior to joining TEC, he was Professor of Higher Education Development at the Centre for Education Futures (CEF), University of Western Australia. His role was to build the capacity of academics in the digital delivery of their teaching. His career path also had him as Interim Director and Quality Advisor (Evaluations and Research) at the Centre for Higher Education Quality (CHEQ) at Monash University, Australia where he headed the evaluation unit at Monash University. In this capacity he restructured the evaluation framework at the university. The approach to evaluations at Monash has been noted in the first round of the Australian Universities Quality Agency (AUQA) audits and is part of the good practice database.
His research work lies in the areas of quality in the higher education system, classroom and school environments, and the implementation of improvements from stakeholder feedback. He has extensive lecturing experience in the applied sciences in Canada, Singapore and Australia. He is an international consultant in quality and evaluations in higher education. Dr Patricie Mertova is currently a Research Fellow in the Department of Education, University of Oxford, England. She was previously a Research Officer at the University of Queensland, and, prior to that, a Research Fellow in the Centre for the Advancement of Learning and Teaching (CALT) and the Centre for Higher Education Quality (CHEQ), Monash University, Australia. She has recently completed her PhD focusing on the academic voice in higher education quality. She has research expertise in the areas of higher education and higher education quality. Her background is also in the areas of linguistics, translation, cross-cultural communication and foreign languages.