Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

El. knyga: Supreme Court Compendium: Two Centuries of Data, Decisions, and Developments

(Michigan State University, USA), (Stony Brook University, USA), (Emory University, USA), (Washington University St. Louis, USA)
  • Formatas: EPUB+DRM
  • Išleidimo metai: 02-Sep-2021
  • Leidėjas: CQ Press
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781071834589
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: EPUB+DRM
  • Išleidimo metai: 02-Sep-2021
  • Leidėjas: CQ Press
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781071834589
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:

DRM apribojimai

  • Kopijuoti:

    neleidžiama

  • Spausdinti:

    neleidžiama

  • El. knygos naudojimas:

    Skaitmeninių teisių valdymas (DRM)
    Leidykla pateikė šią knygą šifruota forma, o tai reiškia, kad norint ją atrakinti ir perskaityti reikia įdiegti nemokamą programinę įrangą. Norint skaityti šią el. knygą, turite susikurti Adobe ID . Daugiau informacijos  čia. El. knygą galima atsisiųsti į 6 įrenginius (vienas vartotojas su tuo pačiu Adobe ID).

    Reikalinga programinė įranga
    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą mobiliajame įrenginyje (telefone ar planšetiniame kompiuteryje), turite įdiegti šią nemokamą programėlę: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą asmeniniame arba „Mac“ kompiuteryje, Jums reikalinga  Adobe Digital Editions “ (tai nemokama programa, specialiai sukurta el. knygoms. Tai nėra tas pats, kas „Adobe Reader“, kurią tikriausiai jau turite savo kompiuteryje.)

    Negalite skaityti šios el. knygos naudodami „Amazon Kindle“.

The Supreme Court Compendium provides historical and statistical information on the Supreme Court: its institutional development; caseload; decision trends; the background, nomination, and voting behavior of its justices; its relationship with public, governmental, and other judicial bodies; and its impact.  With over 180 tables and figures, this new edition is intended to capture the full retrospective picture through the 2013-2014 term of the Roberts Court and the momentous decisions handed down within the last four years, including United States v. Windsor, National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, and Shelby County v. Holder.
Preface xi
About the Authors xv
Introduction xvii
1 The Supreme Court: An Institutional Perspective
1(2)
Table 1-1 Chronology of Important Events in the Supreme Court's History, 1787-2020
3(24)
Table 1-2 Brief Overview of the Supreme Court 2021
27(3)
Table 1-3 Table 1-3 Select Congressional Legislation Relating to the Supreme Court
30(3)
Table 1-4 Sections of the United States Code Pertaining to the Organization of the Supreme Court
33(1)
Table 1-5 Sections of the United States Code Pertaining to the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court
34(2)
Table 1-6 Supreme Court Budget Appropriations, 1930-2021
36(3)
Table 1-7 The Supreme Court's Operational Budget, Fiscal Years 2019-2021
39(1)
Table 1-8 Salaries of the Justices, 1789-2020
40(2)
Analyzing the Salaries of the Justices: A Data Literacy Lesson
42(3)
Table 1-9 Retirement and Pension Provisions for the Supreme Court Justices
45(2)
Table 1-10 Outline of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States
47(2)
Figure 1-1 The Processing of Supreme Court Cases
49(1)
Table 1-11 The Supreme Court's Calendar
50(1)
Table 1-12 Sections of the United States Code Pertaining to Supreme Court Officers and Employees
51(3)
Table 1-13 Supreme Court Employees: Full-time Permanent Positions, 1930-2021
54(3)
Table 1-14 Administrative Officers of the Supreme Court, 1790-2021
57(2)
2 The Supreme Court's Review Process, Caseload, and Cases
59(4)
Table 2-1 Supreme Court Rule 10: Considerations Governing Review on Certiorari
63(1)
Table 2-2 The Supreme Court's Caseload, 1880-2019 Terms
64(8)
Table 2-3 Cases on the Dockets of the Supreme Court, 1935-1969 Terms
72(2)
Table 2-4 Cases on the Dockets of the Supreme Court, 1970-2019 Terms
74(2)
Table 2-5 Petitions Granted Review, 1926-1969 Terms
76(3)
Table 2-6 Petitions Granted Review, 1970-2019 Terms
79(3)
Table 2-7 Guide to Oral Argument at the Supreme Court
82(4)
Table 2-8 Signed Opinions, Cases Disposed of by Signed Opinion, and Cases Disposed of by Per Curiam Opinion, 1926-2019 Terms
86(3)
Table 2-9 Print Reporting Systems
89(1)
Table 2-10 Where to Obtain Supreme Court Opinions
90(4)
Table 2-11 Formally Decided Cases by Chief Justice Era, 1791-2019 Terms
94(4)
Comparing Issues in Cases by Chief Justice Era: A Data Literacy Lesson
98(2)
Table 2-12 Major Decisions of the Supreme Court: The New York Times Measure, 1937-2019 Terms
100(31)
Table 2-13 Cases Incorporating Provisions of the Bill of Rights into the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
131(2)
Table 2-14 Supreme Court Decisions Holding Acts of Congress Unconstitutional in Whole or in Part, 1791-2019 Terms
133(6)
Table 2-15 Supreme Court Decisions Holding State Constitutional and Statutory Provisions and Municipal Ordinances Unconstitutional on Their Face or as Administered, 1791-2019 Terms
139(26)
Table 2-16 Supreme Court Decisions Overruled by Subsequent Decisions, 1791-2019 Terms
165(18)
3 The Supreme Court's Opinion, Decision, and Outcome Trends
183(2)
Table 3-1 Unanimous Decisions, 1791-2019 Terms
185(6)
Table 3-2 Dissenting Opinions, 1791-2019 Terms
191(6)
Table 3-3 Dissenting Votes, 1791-2019 Terms
197(6)
Investigating Trends in Dissenting Votes: A Data Literacy Lesson
203(3)
Table 3-4 Concurring Opinions, 1791-2019 Terms
206(6)
Table 3-5 Concurring Votes, 1791-2019 Terms
212(6)
Table 3-6 Cases Decided by a Closely Divided Vote, 1791-2019 Terms
218(6)
Table 3-7 Cases Decided by a Judgment of the Court, 1791-2019 Terms
224(6)
Table 3-8 Disposition of Cases, 1791-2019 Terms
230(6)
Table 3-9 Ideological Direction of Court Decisions, by Issue Area and Chief Justice, 1791-2019 Terms
236(4)
Table 3-10 Ideological Direction of Court Decisions, by Issue Area, 1791-2019 Terms
240(7)
Table 3-11 Means and Medians Based on Votes, 1937-2019 Terms
247(3)
Table 3-12 Means and Medians of Segal-Cover Scores, 1946-2019 Terms
250(2)
Table 3-13 Martin and Quinn's Estimated Locations of the Most Liberal, Median, and Most Conservative Ideal Points, 1937-2019 Terms
252(3)
4 The Justices: Backgrounds, Nominations, and Confirmations
255(148)
Table 4-1 The Justices of the United States Supreme Court
259(5)
Table 4-2 Birth and Childhood Statistics for the Justices
264(8)
Table 4-3 Family Background of the Justices
272(11)
Table 4-4 Education and Legal Training of the Justices
283(15)
Table 4-5 Marriages and Children of the Justices
298(5)
Table 4-6 Private Practice and Law Professorships of the Justices
303(10)
Table 4-7 Military Experience of the Justices
313(2)
Table 4-8 Political Experience of the Justices
315(16)
Table 4-9 Prior Judicial Experience of the Justices
331(9)
Table 4-10 Summary of Background Characteristics of the Justices
340(2)
Table 4-11 Personal Finances of the Justices, 2019
342(2)
Table 4-12 Supreme Court Nominees
344(9)
Exploring Age at the Time of Nomination: A Data Literacy Lesson
353(3)
Table 4-13 Supreme Court Nominees and the Vacancies to Be Filled
356(11)
Table 4-14 Senate Judiciary Committee Action on Supreme Court Nominees
367(16)
Table 4-15 Senate Action on Supreme Court Nominees
383(11)
Table 4-16 American Bar Association Rating of Supreme Court Nominees since 1956
394(2)
Table 4-17 Confirmation Factors, 1937-2020
396(2)
Table 4-18 Public Opinion: Respondents Supporting or Opposing Nominees for the Supreme Court
398(2)
Table 4-19 Appointment Anomalies
400(3)
5 The Justices: Post-Confirmation Activities and Departures from the Court
403(108)
Table 5-1 Length of Service (Ranked)
406(3)
Studying the Justices' Length of Service: A Data Literacy Lesson
409(2)
Table 5-2 Natural Courts
411(11)
Table 5-3 Circuit Justice Assignments, 1802-1867
422(2)
Table 5-4 Circuit Justice Assignments, 1867-2021
424(5)
Table 5-5 Extrajudicial Activities while Sitting on the Court
429(5)
Table 5-6 Impeachment Actions against Supreme Court Justices
434(1)
Table 5-7 Departure from the Court
435(7)
Table 5-8 Justices Rated "Great," Selected Studies
442(3)
Table 5-9 Post-Court Activities
445(6)
Table 5-10 The Deaths of the Justices
451(12)
Table 5-11 Locations of Justices' Personal Papers
463(10)
Table 5-12 Selected Books and Articles Written by the Justices
473(15)
Table 5-13 Published Biographies of the Justices
488(23)
6 The Justices: Oral Arguments, Votes, and Opinions
511(160)
Table 6-1 Ideological Values of the Justices, 1937-2020
514(2)
Table 6-2 Martin-Quinn Estimates of the Justices' Ideology and the Median Justice, 1937-2019 Terms
516(11)
Table 6-3 Number of Questions Asked, on Average, Per Case, by the Individual Justices during Oral Argument, 2010-2019 Terms
527(1)
Table 6-4 Aggregate Liberal Voting of Justices, 1791-2020 Terms
528(12)
Table 6-5 Liberal Voting of the Justices, by Term, 1800-2019 Terms
540(51)
Table 6-6 Voting Interagreements among the Justices, the Marshall Court
591(3)
Table 6-7 Voting Interagreements among the Justices, the Taney Court
594(7)
Table 6-8 Voting Interagreements among the Justices, the Chase Court
601(4)
Table 6-9 Voting Interagreements among the Justices, the Waite Court
605(5)
Table 6-10 Voting Interagreements among the Justices, the Fuller Court
610(6)
Table 6-11 Voting Interagreements among the Justices, the White Court
616(4)
Table 6-12 Voting Interagreements among the Justices, the Taft Court
620(4)
Table 6-13 Voting Interagreements among the Justices, the Hughes Court
624(5)
Table 6-14 Voting Interagreements among the Justices, the Stone Court
629(3)
Table 6-15 Voting Interagreements among the Justices, the Vinson Court
632(3)
Table 6-16 Voting Interagreements among the Justices, the Warren Court
635(6)
Table 6-17 Voting Interagreements among the Justices, the Burger Court
641(4)
Table 6-18 Voting Interagreements among the Justices, the Rehnquist Court
645(5)
Table 6-19 Voting Interagreements among the Justices, the Roberts Court
650(4)
Table 6-20 Proportion of Votes in the Majority in Decisions Declaring Legislation Unconstitutional, 1791-2019 Terms
654(4)
Table 6-21 Proportion of Votes in the Majority in Decisions Formally Altering Precedent, 1791-2019 Terms
658(3)
Table 6-22 Opinions of the Court, Dissenting Opinions, and Concurring Opinions, 1791-2019 Terms
661(3)
Identifying Patterns in the Justices' Opinion Writing: A Data Literacy Lesson
664(1)
Table 6-23 Votes of the Justices, 1791-2019 Terms
665(3)
Table 6-24 Solo Dissents, 1791-2019 Terms
668(3)
7 The Supreme Court: Its Political and Legal Environments
671(94)
Table 7-1 Amendments to the U.S. Constitution Overturning Supreme Court Decisions
676(1)
Table 7-2 Most Litigated Federal Laws, by Chief Justice Era, 1801-2019 Terms (Marshall to Roberts)
676(3)
Table 7-3 Most Litigated Constitutional Provisions, by Chief Justice Era, 1801-2019 Terms (Marshall to Roberts)
679(3)
Table 7-4 Chairs of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary
682(2)
Table 7-5 Chairs of the House Committee on the Judiciary
684(2)
Table 7-6 Impeachment of Federal Judges and Justices
686(3)
Figure 7-1 Organizational Chart of the Department of Justice
689(1)
Table 7-7 Attorneys General of the United States
690(4)
Figure 7-2 Organizational Chart of the Office of the Solicitor General
694(1)
Table 7-8 Solicitors General of the United States
695(3)
Table 7-9 Success Rate of the United States as a Party to a Case before the Supreme Court, 1791-2019 Terms
698(3)
Table 7-10 Success Rate of the United States as a Party to a Case before the Supreme Court, by Issue Area and Chief Justice, 1800-2019 Terms (Marshall to Roberts)
701(3)
Analyzing the Success of the U.S. Government in the Supreme Court: A Data Literacy Lesson
704(3)
Table 7-11 Position Taken by the Solicitor General as an Amicus Curiae in Cases before the Supreme Court, 1946-2019
707(1)
Table 7-12 Success Rate of the Solicitor General as an Amicus Curiae in Cases before the Supreme Court, 1946-2019 Terms
708(2)
Table 7-13 Success Rate of Federal Agencies as a Party to a Case before the Supreme Court, 1860-2019 Terms
710(4)
Table 7-14 Success Rate of Federal Agencies as a Party to a Case before the Supreme Court, by Issue Area, 1860-2019 Terms
714(1)
Table 7-15 Success Rate of Federal Agencies as a Party to a Case before the Supreme Court, by Agency, 1860-2019 Terms
715(3)
Table 7-16 Success Rate of States as a Party to a Case before the Supreme Court, 1850-2019 Terms
718(4)
Table 7-17 Success Rate of States as a Party to a Case before the Supreme Court, by Issue Area and Chief Justice, 1837-2019 Terms (Taney to Roberts)
722(3)
Table 7-18 Success Rates of States as a Party to a Case before the Supreme Court, by State, 1791-2019 Terms
725(2)
Table 7-19 Supreme Court Rule 37: Brief for Amicus Curiae
727(2)
Table 7-20 Supreme Court Cases Containing At Least One Amicus Curiae Brief, 1946-2019 Terms
729(1)
Figure 7-3 The American Court System
730(1)
Figure 7-4 The Federal Court System: United States Courts of Appeals and United States District Courts
731(1)
Table 7-21 The Development of the U.S. Courts of Appeals
732(9)
Table 7-22 U.S. Court of Appeals Decisions Reversed by the Supreme Court, 1891-2019 Terms
741(7)
Table 7-23 Article I Special Jurisdiction Courts
748(5)
Table 7-24 Article III Special Jurisdiction Courts
753(5)
Table 7-25 Specialized Court Decisions Reversed, 1791-2019
758(1)
Table 7-26 State and Territorial Court Decisions Reversed by Chief Justice Era, 1801-2019 Terms (Marshall to Roberts)
759(6)
8 The Supreme Court and Public Opinion
765(4)
Table 8-1 Respondents Allowing Atheists to Perform Specified Activity (Percentage)
769(1)
Table 8-2 Respondents Allowing Racists to Perform Specified Activity (Percentage)
770(1)
Table 8-3 Respondents Allowing Gays to Perform Specified Activity (Percentage)
771(1)
Table 8-4 Respondents Allowing Communists to Perform Specified Activity (Percentage)
772(1)
Table 8-5 Respondents Allowing Militarists to Perform Specified Activity (Percentage)
773(1)
Table 8-6 Respondents Favoring Capital Punishment, Various Polls (Percentage)
774(2)
Table 8-7 Respondents Believing Courts Not Harsh Enough with Criminals (Percentage)
776(1)
Table 8-8 Respondents Approving of Brown v. Board of Education
777(1)
Table 8-9 Respondents Disapproving of Racial Intermarriage and Approving of Segregated Neighborhoods (Percentage)
778(2)
Table 8-10 Respondents Approving of Busing, Various Polls (Percentage)
780(1)
Table 8-11 Respondents Favoring or Opposing Affirmative Action (Percentage)
781(1)
Table 8-12 Respondents Believing a Woman's Job Is to Take Care of the Home
782(1)
Table 8-13 Respondents Believing Information on Birth Control Should Be Legally Available, Select Polls (Percentage)
783(1)
Table 8-14 Respondents Believing Birth Control Should Be Available to Minors
784(1)
Table 8-15 Respondents Supporting Roe v. Wade, Select Polls (Percentage)
785(2)
Table 8-16 Respondents Believing Abortion Should Be Legal Under Any Circumstances, Legal Only in Certain Circumstances, or Illegal in All Circumstances (Percentage)
787(2)
Table 8-17 Respondents Supporting Legal Abortion under Special Circumstances (Percentage)
789(1)
Table 8-18 Respondents Believing Gay Sex Is Wrong
790(1)
Table 8-19 Respondents' Views on Same-Sex Marriage (Percentage)
791(1)
Table 8-20 Respondents Approving of Supreme Court Decisions Preventing Organized Prayer or Bible Readings in Schools, Select Polls (Percentage)
792(1)
Table 8-21 Respondents Believing Gun Laws Should be More Strict, Less Strict, or Kept As They are Now (Percentage)
793(1)
Table 8-22 Respondents Supporting an Individual's Right to Die, Various Polls (Percentage)
794(1)
Table 8-23 Respondents Having a Great Deal of Confidence in the Supreme Court, Congress, and the Executive Branch of the Federal Government (Percentage)
795(1)
Table 8-24 Respondents Having a Great Deal or Quite A Lot of Confidence in the Supreme Court, Congress, and the Presidency (Percentage)
796(2)
Exploring Public Confidence in the Supreme Court: A Data Literacy Lesson
798(3)
Table 8-25 Respondents Believing the Supreme Court Is Too Liberal, Too Conservative, or About Right (Percentage)
801(1)
Table 8-26 Respondents' Impressions of the Justices 2019(Percentage)
802(1)
Table 8-27 Public Reaction to Franklin D. Roosevelt's Plan to Enlarge the Supreme Court (Percentage)
803(1)
Table 8-28 Members of State, District, and Territorial Bars Favoring Franklin D. Roosevelt's Plan to Enlarge the Supreme Court (1937)
804(2)
Table 8-29 Respondents Believing That the Supreme Court's Decision in Bush v. Gore Mainly Reflected the Political Views or Partisan Politics of the Justices (Percentage)
806(1)
Table 8-30 Respondents Approving of or Agreeing with the Supreme Court's Decision in Bush v. Gore (Percentage)
807(2)
Index 809