Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review 3rd Revised edition [Minkštas viršelis]

4.00/5 (53 ratings by Goodreads)
  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 424 pages, aukštis x plotis: 242x170 mm, weight: 720 g
  • Išleidimo metai: 29-Nov-2021
  • Leidėjas: Sage Publications Ltd
  • ISBN-10: 1529711843
  • ISBN-13: 9781529711844
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 424 pages, aukštis x plotis: 242x170 mm, weight: 720 g
  • Išleidimo metai: 29-Nov-2021
  • Leidėjas: Sage Publications Ltd
  • ISBN-10: 1529711843
  • ISBN-13: 9781529711844
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
Whether you are new to literature reviews or working with new types of data, this book takes the guesswork out of writing your literature review. From deciding how much literature to include to managing your data, assessing your sources, and writing results, it outlines a step-by-step process that works with any data.

To help you choose best approach for your research, this book includes:
·       Worksheets and decision aids to help you plan and organise your literature review
·       Worked examples and case studies to show you what – and what not – to do in practice
·       Troubleshooting tips and answers to all your frequently asked questions
·       Online access to a literature review starter template, an exercise workbook, project diary template, and a source credibility checklist.

The perfect project support for any social sciences student, this edition also includes a new chapter on analysing mixed methods research.



This book takes the guesswork out of writing your literature review, providing a step-by-step process that works with any data.

Recenzijos

The Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review (third edition) by Andrew Booth, Anthea Sutton, Mark Clowes and Marrissa Martyn-St James is a comprehensive overview of the entire evidence synthesis process from selecting the appropriate method for an evidence synthesis topic all the way to the analysis and dissemination of the review. This book is of relevance to anyone interested in evidence synthesis from trainees to researchers to decision-makers. Anyone can learn something from this book, whether you are a beginner, intermediate, or advance researcher in evidence synthesis. This book is perfect for university-level courses or for anyone interested in evidence synthesis. The exercises, toolbox, key learning points, and frequently asked questions were particularly helpful in advancing my learning. -- Andrea Tricco

List of Contents
xiv
About the Authors xxi
Preface xxiii
Chapter Overview xxiv
Working your way through this book xxv
Examples of Review Challenges and How This Book Can Help xxix
`I have a general review topic in mind, but I don't know where to focus' xxix
`I have no idea how much literature exists on my review topic' xxix
`I am confident I can find and select studies for my review; however, I am not sure how to assess the quality of the evidence base' xxx
`I am not sure how to select an appropriate method of synthesis for my review' xxx
`I realise that I will need to clearly report my methodology when I write up my review. Should I make notes as I go along to aid with this?' xxx
Summary xxx
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) xxx
FAQ 0.1 Is this book for me? xxx
FAQ 0.2 I may not want to undertake a full systematic review but I want to make my review more systematic. How can I do this? xxxi
FAQ 0.3 How do I find out the meaning of unfamiliar terms used in the book? xxxi
FAQ 0.4 How can I view images used in this book? xxxi
FAQ 0.5 I've completed one of the exercises in the book. Where can I find the answers? xxxi
Suggestions for Further Information xxxi
Online Resources xxxii
1 Meeting the Review Family: An Overview
1(21)
In a Nutshell - Meeting the Review Family
1(1)
Key Terms Explained
1(1)
Introduction
2(1)
What is a Literature Review?
2(3)
Why be systematic?
3(1)
What does it mean for a review to be systematic?
3(2)
When Do I Do a Literature Review?
5(1)
Meet the Review Family
6(9)
Traditional review family
6(1)
Systematic review family
7(1)
Review of reviews family
8(2)
Rapid review family
10(1)
Qualitative review family
11(1)
Mixed methods review family
12(1)
Purpose-specific review family
13(2)
Why Not a Literature Review?
15(1)
What is not a Literature Review?
15(1)
How Do I Prepare to Do a Literature Review?
16(2)
Practical step 1 Choose your topic
16(1)
Practical step 2 Think about your intended purpose
17(1)
Practical step 3 Think about your intended audience
17(1)
Practical step 4 Where will the literature be found?
17(1)
Practical step 5 What will the literature, and the data, look like?
17(1)
Going Forward
18(1)
Summary
18(1)
Toolbox - Published Guidelines/Guidance for Different Review Types
19(1)
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
20(1)
FAQ 1.1 What if I haven't Identified a review topic yet?
20(1)
FAQ 1.2 What if I don't know which type of review is most appropriate for my topic?
20(1)
FAQ 1.3 Where can I find additional resources?
20(1)
Suggestions for Further Information
20(2)
2 Getting Started on Your Literature Review
22(46)
In a Nutshell - Getting Started on Your Literature Review
22(1)
Key Terms Explained
22(1)
Introduction
23(1)
Why is the Literature Review so Important?
24(1)
Where Do I Start?
25(1)
Where Does the Literature Review Fit Within the Context of Research?
25(2)
What types of research question are suitable for the literature review?
26(1)
Why Review the Literature?
27(2)
Is my review really necessary?
28(1)
A Brief History of Research Synthesis
29(1)
What is the Place of Theory in the literature review?
30(4)
The traditional narrative review, the systematic review and `systematic approaches'
32(2)
Clarification of Terminology
34(2)
Introducing the SALSA Framework
36(1)
Systematic Approaches
36(4)
How Do I Plan and Conduct My Literature Review?
40(3)
Time
41(2)
Quality
43(1)
Money
43(1)
Managing Your Literature Review
43(3)
Project management challenges
46(1)
Updates to Existing Reviews
46(4)
At a glance - review update
48(2)
Converting Your Review to a Different Format
50(14)
Skills and resources
50(1)
Study skills and techniques
51(1)
What generic skills will I require for my review?
51(1)
How do I gain needed skills in systematic approaches?
52(3)
Stages of the literature review
55(7)
Tools to support the review process
62(1)
Avoiding common pitfalls
63(1)
Summary
64(1)
Key Learning Points
64(1)
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
65(2)
FAQ 2.1 Should I always aim to be `systematic' when conducting my literature review?
65(1)
FAQ 2.2 If all reviews are `systematic' should I call my review a `systematic review'?
65(1)
FAQ 2.3 Do I need a minimum amount of literature to conduct a literature review?
65(1)
FAQ 2.4 Must I only include high-quality literature or particular study types within my literature review?
65(1)
FAQ 2.5 Should I update an existing review?
66(1)
FAQ 2.6 Will updating a review be cheaper than the original review?
66(1)
FAQ 2.7 What are the main things that could go wrong when conducting a review?
66(1)
Suggestions for Further Information
67(1)
3 Choosing Your Review Methods
68(25)
In a Nutshell - How to Choose Your Review Methods
68(1)
Key Terms Explained
68(1)
Introduction
69(1)
Acknowledging Your Review Constraints
70(4)
A Generic Process for Planning Your Review
74(1)
Our `Survival Kit' of Review Options
75(7)
Mapping review
76(3)
Scoping review
79(1)
Systematic review
79(1)
Scoping meta-review
80(1)
Review of reviews (overview)
81(1)
Review Choice Scenarios
82(6)
Summary
88(1)
Key Learning Points
88(1)
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
89(2)
FAQ 3.1 How can I use other people's reviews in my own research?
89(1)
FAQ 3.2 Is a scoping review or mapping review automatically a rapid review?
89(1)
FAQ 3.3 What if scoping reveals studies are poor in quality?
89(1)
FAQ 3.4 What if eligible studies lack detail?
90(1)
FAQ 3.5 What if I am short of time?
90(1)
FAQ 3.6 Should I perform a rapid review?
91(1)
Suggestions for Further Information
91(2)
4 Denning Your Scope
93(31)
In a Nutshell - How to Define Your Review Scope
93(1)
Key Terms Explained
93(1)
Introduction
94(10)
Why is defining your scope important?
94(3)
Defining your scope with your audience in mind
97(1)
Frameworks for defining your scope
97(3)
Complex interventions
100(4)
Logic models
104(1)
Further Defining Your Scope
104(8)
Descriptive mapping
106(3)
Data mining and automation
109(1)
Concept mapping
109(1)
Concept analysis
109(3)
Toolbox - Defining Your Scope
112(2)
Tools for data mining
112(1)
Tools for concept mapping
113(1)
Defining Your Scope: Challenges and Pitfalls
114(2)
How wide do I go? (Sampling approaches)
114(2)
How narrow can I stay? (Scope creep)
116(1)
The Review Protocol
116(4)
Examples of review protocols
117(3)
Summary
120(1)
Key Learning Points
121(1)
Frequently asked questions (FAQs)
121(1)
FAQ 4.1 None of the frameworks fit my question. How can I formulate my research idea?
121(1)
FAQ 4.2 With so much literature in my review topic, how can I review it systematically?
121(1)
FAQ 4.3 My research question is actually four or five questions, is this a problem?
121(1)
FAQ 4.4 I had identified a defined question but my scoping search identified nothing on this topic, what shall I do?
122(1)
FAQ 4.5 Is it really necessary to formally complete the review protocol?
122(1)
FAQ 4.6 When is it appropriate to change my review scope?
122(1)
Suggestions for Further Information
122(2)
5 Searching the Literature
124(70)
In a Nutshell - How to Conduct a Literature Search
124(1)
Key Terms Explained
124(1)
Introduction
125(1)
Stages in the Literature Searching Process
126(20)
1 Who should conduct the literature search?
127(1)
2 Aims and purpose of literature searching
128(1)
3 How to prepare for your review (the scoping search)
129(4)
4 How to construct your search strategy
133(2)
5 How to search bibliographic databases
135(4)
6 How to use supplementary searching
139(1)
7 How to manage your references
140(1)
8 How to report the search process
141(5)
Types of literature reviews
146(1)
Translating your review question into a search strategy
146(6)
Toolbox - Searching the Literature
152(1)
Summary
153(1)
Key Learning Points
154(1)
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
154(2)
FAQ 5.1 How do I identify synonyms for my research topic concepts?
154(1)
FAQ 5.2 How do I know when to stop searching?
154(1)
FAQ 5.3 Is it sensible to use NOT in a search strategy?
154(1)
FAQ 5.4 I have completed my searching, but have now discovered an additional search term that might be useful, what should I do?
155(1)
FAQ 5.5 Should I use abbreviations in my search terms?
155(1)
FAQ 5.6 I have noticed substantial duplication between the databases I have searched, how do I handle this?
155(1)
FAQ 5.7 Do I need to use a search filter?
155(1)
Suggestions for Further Information
156(2)
6 Assessing the Evidence Base
158(1)
In a Nutshell - Selecting Studies to Include in Your Review and Assessing Their Quality
158(1)
Key Terms Explained
158(1)
Introduction
159(1)
How to Assess the Relevance of Studies to Your Review Question
160(3)
Steps in the study selection process
161(1)
Using software for study selection
162(1)
Assessing Your Included Studies - First Steps
163(3)
Assessing the Evidence Base in Detail
166(15)
Assessing the quality of included studies - what is it and why do we do it?
166(1)
Study designs -- is there a hierarchy of evidence?
167(6)
Quality assessment: validity, reliability and applicability
173(2)
Carrying out quality assessment
175(6)
Toolbox - Quality Assessment Checklists
181(10)
Case study - drafting a checklist
181(5)
Quality assessment of qualitative research
186(2)
Quality assessment for mixed methods reviews
188(1)
Applying quality assessment
189(1)
Issues and challenges in quality assessment
189(2)
Summary
191(1)
Key Learning Points
191(1)
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
191(2)
FAQ 6.11 Am unsure whether to include a study in my review, what can I do?
191(1)
FAQ 6.2 Do I need to record a reason for all the studies I exclude?
192(1)
FAQ 6.3 How do I keep track of what I have included and excluded and at what stage?
192(1)
FAQ 6.4 I am unsure how much effort I will need to spend on quality assessment and how I should approach it for my review?
192(1)
FAQ 6.5 I am critically appraising a systematic review and I want to assess the issue of heterogeneity, whereabouts in the review should I look for this?
192(1)
FAQ 6.6 Can I combine my data extraction with my quality assessment, so I don't need to read each study twice?
192(1)
Suggestions for Further Information
193(1)
7 Synthesising and Analysing Quantitative Studies
194(41)
In a Nutshell - How to Synthesise and Analyse Quantitative Studies
194(1)
Key Terms Explained
194(1)
Introduction
195(1)
Synthesis-Analysis, Analysis-Synthesis?
196(25)
Overview of approaches to synthesis
196(1)
Extracting quantitative data for your review
197(2)
Planning your synthesis strategy
199(3)
Approaches to synthesis
202(3)
Tabular presentation
205(1)
Numerical presentation
206(4)
Graphical approaches
210(8)
Analysis of quantitative research
218(1)
Use of validity assessment
218(1)
Subgroup analysis
219(1)
Sensitivity analysis
219(2)
Revisiting the Review Question(s)
221(10)
Discussing the limitations of the evidence
222(4)
Publication bias
226(3)
Selective outcome reporting bias
229(2)
Summary
231(1)
Key Learning Points
232(1)
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
232(2)
FAQ 7.1 Do I need to be skilled in statistics to conduct a systematic review?
232(1)
FAQ 7.2 How do I decide which method of meta-analysis to use?
232(1)
FAQ 7.3 Are there any software that will help with data extraction?
233(1)
FAQ 7.4 What software is available for performing a meta-analysis?
233(1)
FAQ 7.5 What if the studies in my meta-analysis are of variable quality?
234(1)
Suggestions for Further Information
234(1)
8 Synthesising and Analysing Qualitative Studies
235(39)
In a Nutshell - How to synthesise and analyse qualitative studies
235(1)
Key Terms Explained
235(1)
Introduction
236(1)
Synthesis-analysis: an iterative process
237(1)
Overview of Approaches to Qualitative Synthesis
237(2)
Aggregative, configurative or integrative?
238(1)
A Step-by-Step Guide to Qualitative Synthesis
239(5)
Step 1 Formulating the question
239(1)
Steps 2and 3 - Searching and screening the literature
240(1)
Step 4 Extracting qualitative data for your review
241(1)
Step 5 Quality assessment (appraisal)
242(1)
Step 6 Synthesis
242(1)
Step 7 Analysis and interpretation
243(1)
Getting Started in Qualitative Synthesis
244(5)
Thematic synthesis
245(1)
Framework synthesis
246(1)
Best fit framework synthesis
247(2)
Progressing to Advanced Forms of Synthesis
249(14)
Meta-ethnography
249(4)
Qualitative data analysis
253(5)
Where to next? Advanced forms of analysis
258(5)
Writing Up and Presenting Review Findings
263(7)
Using tables to present your data
263(1)
Using numbers to present your data
264(1)
Using graphics to present your data
264(4)
Rapid QES (rQES)
268(1)
Mega-ethnography and mega-aggregation (review of reviews)
269(1)
Summary
270(1)
Key Learning Points
270(1)
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
271(2)
FAQ 8.1 How do I choose an appropriate method for qualitative synthesis?
271(1)
FAQ 8.2 Which methods of qualitative evidence synthesis are most suitable for a novice reviewer?
271(1)
FAQ 8.3 Once I have identified all my included papers where should I start?
271(1)
FAQ 8.4 How many studies do I need for my qualitative synthesis?
272(1)
FAQ 8.5 What guidance is available for reporting qualitative synthesis?
272(1)
Suggestions for Further Information
273(1)
9 Synthesising and Analysing Mixed Methods Data
274(35)
In a Nutshell - How to Synthesise and Analyse Mixed Methods Data
274(1)
Key Terms Explained
274(1)
Introduction
275(2)
Undertaking a Mixed Methods Review
277(1)
A Step-by-Step Guide to Mixed Methods Synthesis
278(17)
Step 1 Constructing statement of overall goal/research problem
282(1)
Step 2 Scoping the review
283(1)
Step 3 Formulating the review question(s)
283(3)
Step 4 Deciding on the review design
286(1)
Step 5 Determining initial criteria for inclusion/exclusion
286(1)
Step 6 Conducting an extensive literature search
287(1)
Step 7 Selecting final articles for inclusion
287(1)
Step 8 Assessing study quality
288(1)
Step 9 Extracting the data
288(1)
Step 10 Synthesising and integrating the studies
289(1)
Step 11 Interpreting the evidence
290(1)
Step 12 Presenting the results
290(5)
Points of Integration for Quantitative and Qualitative evidence
295(8)
Review team level
295(1)
Integration within the review process
295(1)
Integrating at the review level
296(1)
Integration via the review process
296(5)
Integrating using a common structure, framework or model
301(1)
Integrating through `translation' of the data
302(1)
On the Role of the Narrative Review
303(2)
The usefulness of mixed methods reviews
304(1)
Summary
305(1)
Key Learning Points
306(1)
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
306(2)
FAQ 9.1 Should I perform a rapid mixed methods review?
306(1)
FAQ 9.2 Which methods of integrating quantitative and qualitative evidence are most suitable for a novice reviewer?
306(1)
FAQ 9.3 Should I publish my mixed methods review as one publication or two?
306(1)
FAQ 9.4 Why should I consider conducting a mixed methods review?
307(1)
FAQ 9.5 I can't decide between conducting two separate reviews of quantitative and qualitative evidence and undertaking a single mixed methods synthesis. What particular issues should I bear in mind?
307(1)
Suggestions for Further Information
308(1)
10 Writing Up, Presenting and Disseminating Your Review
309(32)
In a Nutshell - How to Write Up, Present and Share Your Review Findings
309(1)
Key Terms Explained
309(1)
Introduction
310(3)
Identifying recommendations for action
310(1)
Highlighting recommendations for future research
311(2)
Considering Your Audience
313(7)
Consumers of your review
314(2)
Writing for research hinders
316(1)
Writing for policy-makers
316(1)
Writing for practitioners
317(1)
Writing for the research community
317(1)
Writing for the media
318(1)
Writing for the public
319(1)
Reflexivity and acknowledging potential bias
319(1)
A Sample Review Structure
320(13)
Reviews and reporting guidelines
326(3)
Use of tables and figures
329(1)
Use of appendices and other supporting features
330(1)
Accurate referencing
330(1)
Structuring other types of review (scoping/mapping reviews)
330(3)
Publicising Your Review
333(1)
Toolbox for Presenting Your Findings
334(3)
Graded entry format
334(2)
GRADE and GRADE-CERQual
336(1)
The EPICOT+ format for reporting research recommendations
336(1)
Summary
337(1)
Key Learning Points
337(1)
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
338(2)
FAQ 10.1 How do I identify reporting guidelines that relate to my systematic review?
338(1)
FAQ 10.2 Is it mandatory to use reporting guidelines where available?
338(1)
FAQ 10.3 What should I report if I produce an empty review?
338(1)
FAQ 10.4 What outputs can I use to disseminate my review?
339(1)
FAQ 10.5 How can I promote outputs from my review?
339(1)
Suggestions for Further Information
340(1)
References 341(35)
Index 376
Andrew Booth is a Reader in Evidence-Based Information Practice at the School of  Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield. Anthea Sutton is a Research Fellow at the School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield. Mark Clowes is a Research Fellow at the School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield.





Marrissa Martyn-St James is an Honorary Lecturer at the School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield.