Abbreviations |
|
vii | |
Preface |
|
viii | |
Who Reference documents for IVM |
|
x | |
Executive summary |
|
xii | |
Glossary |
|
xv | |
|
|
1 | (9) |
|
1.1 Importance of vector-borne diseases |
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
1.2 Integrated vector management for disease control |
|
|
3 | (6) |
|
1.3 Integrated vector management over time |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
2 Framework for planning and implementing vector control management |
|
|
10 | (9) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
2.2 Organizational structures |
|
|
11 | (5) |
|
2.3 Assessments of need for vector control and other activities |
|
|
16 | (3) |
|
3 Disease situation analysis |
|
|
19 | (29) |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
|
21 | (24) |
|
3.2.1 Step 1. Examine maps of disease endemicity |
|
|
21 | (12) |
|
3.2.2 Step 2. Investigate epidemiology (first administrative level) |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
3.2.3 Step 3. Assess vector distribution and ecology |
|
|
34 | (4) |
|
3.2.4 Step 4. Stratify areas according to diseases present and their current incidence |
|
|
38 | (7) |
|
3.3 Local (district level and below) analysis |
|
|
45 | (3) |
|
3.3.1 Step 1. Investigate epidemiology (lower administrative level) |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
3.3.2 Step 2. Consider other environmental factors, alternative hosts and Human factors that may influence disease |
|
|
46 | (2) |
|
4 Selection of vector control methods |
|
|
48 | (40) |
|
4.1 Efficacy against vector-borne diseases |
|
|
49 | (25) |
|
|
49 | (4) |
|
4.1.2 Lymphatic filariasis |
|
|
53 | (3) |
|
|
56 | (3) |
|
4.1.4 Cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis |
|
|
59 | (5) |
|
4.1.5 Human African trypanosomiasis |
|
|
64 | (3) |
|
|
67 | (2) |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
4.1.8 Human onchocerciasis |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
4.1.9 Other viral infections |
|
|
71 | (3) |
|
4.2 Multiple diseases and multiple interventions |
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
4.3 Vector characteristics, resistance status and risk for development of resistance |
|
|
76 | (2) |
|
4.4 Human and environmental safety |
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
4.5 Affordability and cost--effectiveness |
|
|
80 | (2) |
|
4.6 Acceptability and community participation |
|
|
82 | (3) |
|
4.7 Delivery of interventions |
|
|
85 | (3) |
|
|
88 | (7) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
5.2 Human resources and capacity-building |
|
|
89 | (3) |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
5.4 Tools for resource planning |
|
|
92 | (3) |
|
6 Strategy for implementing integrated vector management |
|
|
95 | (28) |
|
6.1 Spatio-temporal targeting |
|
|
95 | (7) |
|
|
95 | (5) |
|
|
100 | (2) |
|
6.2 Implementation of integrated vector control |
|
|
102 | (3) |
|
6.3 Involving the non-health sector |
|
|
105 | (18) |
|
6.3.1 Community participation |
|
|
110 | (6) |
|
|
116 | (2) |
|
6.3.3 Supporting interventions |
|
|
118 | (2) |
|
6.3.4 Cross-border initiatives |
|
|
120 | (3) |
|
7 Operational and implementation research |
|
|
123 | (8) |
|
7.1 Efficacy of vector control interventions that are not approved by WHO |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
7.2 Pilot-testing and scaling up recommended vector control interventions |
|
|
124 | (4) |
|
7.3 Other research questions |
|
|
128 | (3) |
|
|
131 | (25) |
|
|
131 | (3) |
|
8.2 Parameters to be measured |
|
|
134 | (2) |
|
8.3 Methods for sampling vectors |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
|
137 | (5) |
|
|
137 | (4) |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
8.5 Selecting and using sentinel sites |
|
|
142 | (6) |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
|
142 | (2) |
|
8.5.3 Accessibility of sentinel sites |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
8.5.4 Volume of insecticides used |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
8.5.5 Number of sentinel sites |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
8.5.6 Number and arrangement of collecting stations at sentinel sites |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
8.5.7 Frequency of sampling |
|
|
145 | (3) |
|
8.6 Responsibility for vector surveillance |
|
|
148 | (2) |
|
8.7 Insecticide resistance |
|
|
150 | (5) |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
8.7.2 Testing of malaria vectors |
|
|
150 | (2) |
|
8.7.3 Testing of other vectors |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
8.7.4 Current susceptibility to insecticides |
|
|
152 | (3) |
|
8.8 Entomological data management |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
9 Monitoring and evaluation |
|
|
156 | (26) |
|
|
156 | (3) |
|
9.2 Responsibility for monitoring, evaluation and data flow |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
9.4 Evaluation design and attributing change |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
9.5 Measuring the impact of integrated vector management programmes |
|
|
160 | (12) |
|
9.5.1 Effect on disease burden |
|
|
161 | (3) |
|
9.5.2 Cost and cost--effectiveness of integrated vector management and comparison with standard practice |
|
|
164 | (2) |
|
9.5.3 Reduction in insecticide use and comparison with standard practice |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
9.5.4 Sustainability of the programme |
|
|
166 | (6) |
|
9.6 Framework for quality assurance |
|
|
172 | (4) |
|
|
176 | (5) |
|
9.8 Deciding whether to change, continue or stop integrated vector management |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
|
182 | (22) |
Annex 1 Example stakeholder analysis for including drain rebuilding and maintenance in an IVM programme |
|
204 | (2) |
Annex 2 Local determinants of disease |
|
206 | (11) |
Annex 3 Example logical framework for monitoring and evaluating an integrated vector management programme for malaria and lymphatic filariasis in a rural area |
|
217 | |