Preface |
|
xxxi | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xxxv | |
About The Author |
|
xxxvii | |
|
1 An introduction to Tort law |
|
|
1 | (30) |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
I Introduction to a torts case |
|
|
2 | (3) |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
D The Basis of a Lawsuit Is a Cause of Action |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
II tort law compared to criminal law |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
C Civil and Criminal Cases Operate Independently of One Another |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
D Proof in a Civil' Case Is Preponderance of Evidence |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
III tort law compared to other areas of law |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
IV a short history of tort law |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
C The Development of Tort Law in the United States |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
|
9 | (2) |
|
A Investigating the Cause of Action: Rule 11 |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
VI discovery in civil cases |
|
|
11 | (2) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
C Request for Production of Documents |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
E Request for Physical and/or Mental Examination of a Party |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
VII the trial of a civil case |
|
|
13 | (3) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
C Presentation of the Plaintiff's Case |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
D Motion for Directed Verdict |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
E Presentation of the Defense Case |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
VIII alternative dispute resolution |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
A What Is Alternative Dispute Resolution? |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
B Arbitration Versus Mediation |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
|
18 | (3) |
|
A The Importance of Case Law |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
C Higher Courts of Appeal |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
Case Excerpt: Vallejo v. Ebert |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
Skills You Need in the Real World |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
Ethical Issues for the Paralegal |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
|
25 | (3) |
|
Practice Questions for Test Review |
|
|
28 | (3) |
|
|
31 | (30) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
II the problem with intentional torts |
|
|
32 | (2) |
|
|
34 | (5) |
|
A The Elements of Assault |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
1 The Defendant's Actions Are Intentional |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
3 Harmful or Offensive Contact |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
B The Elements of Battery |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
1 Defendant Acted Intentionally |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
2 What Do We Mean by "Contact"? |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
3 Harmful or Of fensive Contact |
|
|
37 | (2) |
|
4 The Reasonable Person Standard |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
A The Elements of False Imprisonment |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
1 Restraint Must Be Intentional |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
2 Restraint Must Be Unlawful |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
3 By the Use of Force or Threats |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
B Defenses to False Imprisonment |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
V alienation of affections |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
VI intentional infliction of emotional distress |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
A Elements of Infliction of Emotional Distress |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
1 Intentional or Reckless Conduct |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
4 The Defendant's Actions Were Outrageous |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
VII malicious prosecution |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
A The Elements of Malicious Prosecution |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
1 Defendant Brings or Continues a Criminal Charge Against the Plaintiff |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
2 The Case Terminates in the Plaintiff's Favor |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
3 The Defendant Acted with Malice in Bringing the Charge |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
4 There Was No Probable Cause for the Charge |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
VIII tort immunity for families |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
IX intentional torts involving property: trespass |
|
|
46 | (2) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
B Entry onto the Plaintiff's Real Property |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
A Public Nuisance Versus Private Nuisance |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
2 Damages and Injunctions |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
B New Lawsuits under Environmental Theories |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
XI torts to personal property: trespass to chattels |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
Case Excerpt: Osprey Cove Real Estate, LLC v. Towerview Constr., LLC |
|
|
50 | (2) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
Skills You Need in the Real World |
|
|
53 | (2) |
|
Ethical Issues for the Paralegal |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
|
56 | (3) |
|
Practice Questions for Test Review |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
3 Defenses to Intentional torts |
|
|
61 | (26) |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
|
62 | (2) |
|
A The Response Must Be Equal to the Threat |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
B Limitations on Self-Defense |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
C Claiming Self-Defense When Defending Others |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
D Other Limitations on Self-Defense: No Deadly Force to Protect Properly |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
IV duress, coercion, necessity, and compulsion |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
B Involuntary Intoxication |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
XI statutes of limitation |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
XII defenses available to codefendants |
|
|
71 | (5) |
|
A Joint and Several Liability |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
1 Employer/Employee Liability (Respondeat Superior) |
|
|
73 | (2) |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
Case Excerpt: Pesci v. Hobbs |
|
|
76 | (2) |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
Skills You Need in the Real World |
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
Ethical Issues for the Paralegal |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
|
80 | (4) |
|
Practice Questions for Test Review |
|
|
84 | (3) |
|
4 Introduction to Negligence |
|
|
87 | (28) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
I negligence: what makes it different? |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
II The history of negligence |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
IV The Four elements of negligence |
|
|
89 | (4) |
|
|
89 | (2) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
V the lawyers who represent plaintiffs and defendants |
|
|
93 | (3) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
B The Economics of Law Firms |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
E Contracting with a Law Firm |
|
|
96 | (3) |
|
VI obtaining information from the client |
|
|
99 | (16) |
|
A Authorizations from the Client |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
B Other Information from the Client: Facts and Photos |
|
|
101 | (2) |
|
Case Excerpt: Lopez v. Albright Coll |
|
|
103 | (4) |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
Skills You Need in the Real World |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
Ethical Issues for the Paralegal |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
|
109 | (3) |
|
Practice Questions for Test Review |
|
|
112 | (3) |
|
|
115 | (30) |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
I the chumley case: a dangerous intersection? |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
II the legal definition of duty |
|
|
117 | (2) |
|
A When Does a Duty Arise? |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
B Using Formulas to Determine Duty |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
C Duty Does Not Depend on Victim's Identity |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
D Duty as a Legal Obligation |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
E Duty Does Not Arise from Habit or Custom |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
F Duty Arising from Professional Status |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
1 What Is the Standard of Care for a Professional? |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
G Duty Arising Out of Other Factors |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
III how the courts determine duty |
|
|
121 | (2) |
|
IV relationship can determine duty |
|
|
123 | (3) |
|
|
123 | (2) |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
|
126 | (4) |
|
A Duty Is on Possessor, Not Owner |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
B Classifying Visitors: Trespassers |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
1 Exceptions to the General Rule of No Duty to Trespassers |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
C Classifying Visitors: Licensees |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
D Classifying Visitors: Invitees |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
E Distinguishing Between Visitor Classifications |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
1 Automobile Guest Statutes |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
F Abnormally Dangerous or Ultra-Hazardous Conditions |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
|
132 | (2) |
|
Case Excerpt: Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California |
|
|
134 | (3) |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
Skills You Need in the Real World |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
Ethical Issues for the Paralegal |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
|
140 | (3) |
|
Practice Questions for Test Review |
|
|
143 | (2) |
|
6 Breach of Duty Under Negligence law |
|
|
145 | (24) |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
II who breached a duty in the chumley case? |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
|
147 | (4) |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
B The Jury Determines the Standard of Care |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
C Physical Characteristics |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
E Professionals Have a Higher Standard of Care |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
IV court doctrines that help to determine breach of duty |
|
|
152 | (4) |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
1 The Commonsense Element of Res Ipsa Loquitur |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
2 Defenses to a Res Ipsa Claim |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
3 Pleading Res Ipsa Loquitur: What the Complaint Should Allege |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
|
154 | (2) |
|
1 What the Complaint Should Say About Negligence Per Se |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
V expert evidence and breach of duty |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
Case Excerpt: Goodman v. Dan Rich, LLC |
|
|
157 | (4) |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
Skills You Need in the Real World |
|
|
161 | (2) |
|
Ethical Issues for the Paralegal |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
|
164 | (3) |
|
Practice Questions for Test Review |
|
|
167 | (2) |
|
|
169 | (30) |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
I proximate cause in the chumley case |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
|
170 | (3) |
|
A Proving Proximate Cause |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
B The Law on Proximate Cause Tends to Be Vague |
|
|
171 | (2) |
|
III the concept of proximate cause |
|
|
173 | (2) |
|
A Historical Development of Proximate Cause |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
B Problems Defining Proximate Cause |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
C Working Definition of Proximate Cause |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
1 Proof of an Injury Caused by the Defendant |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
2 In a Natural, Unbroken, and Continuous Sequence |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
3 Uninterrupted by Any Intervening Causes |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
4 Produced the Plaintiff's Injuries |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
5 Without Which the Result Would Not Have Occurred |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
D Restatements Position on Defining Proximate Cause |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
E Proximate Cause Requires a Close Connection Between the Defendant's Actions and the Plaintiff's Injuries |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
F Proximate Cause Depends on the Facts in the Case |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
G Evaluating a Case for Proximate Cause |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
H Proximate Cause Must Show That the Defendant Is Responsible |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
2 An Analysis of Palsgraf. "Orbit of the Risk" Doctrine (Foreseeability) |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
3 Defining Foreseeability After Palsgraf |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
IV court-created tests for proximate cause |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
B "Substantial Factor" Test |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
V pleading proximate cause |
|
|
180 | (3) |
|
A Is Proximate Cause a Defense? |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
B In the End, Proximate Cause Is a Jury Question |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
1 How Much Evidence Does the Plaintiff Have to Produce to Make Proximate Cause a Jury Question? |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
2 On Appeal, Courts Will Leave the Jury's Determination Intact, Unless Clearly Wrong |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
VI multiple defendants and proximate cause |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
VII intervening and superseding causes |
|
|
183 | (2) |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
VIII acts of god or acts of nature |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
Case Excerpt: Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co. |
|
|
186 | (3) |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
Skills You Need in the Real World |
|
|
190 | (1) |
|
Ethical Issues for the Paralegal |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
|
191 | (5) |
|
Practice Questions for Test Review |
|
|
196 | (3) |
|
|
199 | (36) |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
II damages in the chumley case |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
|
201 | (10) |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
|
203 | (2) |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
4 Proving Compensatory Damages |
|
|
206 | (2) |
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
1 Tort Reform and Punitive Damages |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
IV evaluating a case for potential damages |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
A Reviewing the Facts of a Case |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
|
212 | (23) |
|
A Jury's Function Is Assessing Damages |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
Case Excerpt: Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc. |
|
|
214 | (12) |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
Skills You Need in the Real World |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
Ethical Issues for the Paralegal |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
|
228 | (3) |
|
Practice Questions for Test Review |
|
|
231 | (4) |
|
|
235 | (32) |
|
|
235 | (1) |
|
|
235 | (1) |
|
I The Railroad's Defense In The Chumley case |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
II introduction to contributory negligence |
|
|
237 | (6) |
|
A Historical Reasons for the Development of Contributory Negligence |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
B Defining Contributory Negligence |
|
|
240 | (1) |
|
1 Why Study Contributory Negligence? |
|
|
241 | (1) |
|
2 Why Does the Doctrine Continue to Exist? |
|
|
241 | (1) |
|
C The Doctrine of "Avoidable Consequences" |
|
|
242 | (1) |
|
D How Much at Fault Must Plaintiff Be? |
|
|
242 | (1) |
|
E Is There Such a Thing as "Contributory Negligence Per Se"? |
|
|
243 | (1) |
|
F The "All or Nothing" Element of Contributory Negligence |
|
|
243 | (1) |
|
G Is Contributory Negligence Doomed? |
|
|
243 | (1) |
|
H Exceptions to Contributory Negligence |
|
|
244 | (3) |
|
|
244 | (1) |
|
|
245 | (1) |
|
|
245 | (1) |
|
4 Other Exceptions to Contributory Negligence |
|
|
246 | (1) |
|
|
247 | (1) |
|
I Situations in Which Contributory Negligence Does Not Apply |
|
|
247 | (1) |
|
J Contributory Negligence Is a Jury Question |
|
|
247 | (2) |
|
III comparative negligence |
|
|
249 | (3) |
|
A Historical Development of Comparative Negligence |
|
|
249 | (1) |
|
B The Uniform Comparative Fault Act |
|
|
250 | (1) |
|
C The Three Models of Comparative Negligence |
|
|
250 | (1) |
|
1 Pure Comparative Negligence |
|
|
250 | (1) |
|
2 Modified Comparative Negligence |
|
|
250 | (1) |
|
3 Slight-Gross Comparative Negligence |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
4 Combinations of Approaches |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
D Types of Cases in Which Comparative Negligence Applies |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
E Comparative Negligence and Punitive Damages |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
F How Comparative Negligence Affects Proximate Cause Analysis |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
G Defenses to Comparative Negligence |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
2 Mentally Incompetent Persons |
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
H Pleading Comparative Negligence |
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
I Settlement Issues in Comparative Negligence Cases |
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
J Multiple Defendants and Comparative Negligence |
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
K Motions for Directed Verdict in Comparative Negligence Cases |
|
|
254 | (1) |
|
|
254 | (1) |
|
Case Excerpt: Jordan v. Ohio Dep't of Rehab. & Corr. |
|
|
254 | (2) |
|
|
256 | (1) |
|
|
257 | (1) |
|
Skills You Need in the Real World |
|
|
257 | (2) |
|
Ethical Issues for the Paralegal |
|
|
259 | (1) |
|
|
260 | (1) |
|
|
260 | (4) |
|
Practice Questions for Test Review |
|
|
264 | (3) |
|
10 Strict liability and products Liability |
|
|
267 | (30) |
|
|
267 | (1) |
|
|
267 | (1) |
|
I a products liability case: tire blowout |
|
|
268 | (1) |
|
|
268 | (4) |
|
A Ultra-Hazardous Activity |
|
|
269 | (1) |
|
B Strict Liability for Animal Behavior |
|
|
269 | (1) |
|
C A Short History of Strict Liability |
|
|
270 | (1) |
|
D Statute of Limitations Concerns in Strict Liability Lawsuits |
|
|
271 | (1) |
|
|
272 | (4) |
|
A Early Products Liability in the United States |
|
|
272 | (1) |
|
1 The Theory Underlying the Privity Requirement |
|
|
273 | (1) |
|
B A New Judicial Approach |
|
|
273 | (2) |
|
C The Basic Elements of a Products Liability Case |
|
|
275 | (1) |
|
D Products Liability Cases Do Not Involve Consumer Dissatisfaction |
|
|
276 | (1) |
|
|
276 | (2) |
|
1 Warranty of Merchantability |
|
|
276 | (1) |
|
2 Warranty of Fitness for Purpose |
|
|
277 | (1) |
|
|
277 | (1) |
|
F Liability Without Fault under Products Liability |
|
|
278 | (1) |
|
G The Standard of Care in Products Liability Cases |
|
|
279 | (1) |
|
1 Manufacturer's Duty to Test and Inspect Products |
|
|
279 | (1) |
|
H Products Liability Per Se? |
|
|
280 | (1) |
|
I Public Policy Arguments for Products Liability Cases |
|
|
280 | (1) |
|
J Proving a Products Liability Case |
|
|
281 | (1) |
|
|
281 | (1) |
|
|
281 | (1) |
|
|
282 | (1) |
|
K Pleading Products Liability Cases |
|
|
282 | (1) |
|
L Model Uniform Products Liability Act |
|
|
283 | (1) |
|
M Discovery in Products Liability Cases |
|
|
283 | (1) |
|
N Retailers and "Mere Conduits" |
|
|
284 | (1) |
|
O Inherently Dangerous Objects |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
P Defenses to Products Liability Actions |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
IV the tire blowout hypothetical |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
Case Excerpt: Modisette v.JKppie Inc. |
|
|
285 | (4) |
|
|
289 | (1) |
|
|
289 | (1) |
|
Skills You Need in the Real World |
|
|
289 | (1) |
|
Ethical Issues for the Paralegal |
|
|
290 | (1) |
|
|
291 | (1) |
|
|
291 | (3) |
|
Practice Questions for Test Review |
|
|
294 | (3) |
|
|
297 | (32) |
|
|
297 | (1) |
|
|
297 | (1) |
|
|
298 | (1) |
|
|
298 | (7) |
|
|
299 | (1) |
|
B Defamation Comes in Two Forms |
|
|
299 | (1) |
|
C Elements of Defamation - |
|
|
300 | (1) |
|
1 Unprivileged Defamatory Language |
|
|
300 | (1) |
|
|
300 | (1) |
|
|
301 | (1) |
|
4 The Statement Refers to the Plaintiff |
|
|
301 | (1) |
|
5 Injury to the Plaintiff's Reputation |
|
|
302 | (1) |
|
|
303 | (1) |
|
|
304 | (1) |
|
|
304 | (1) |
|
|
304 | (1) |
|
|
305 | (1) |
|
|
305 | (1) |
|
|
306 | (1) |
|
|
306 | (1) |
|
4 Is Libel More Serious than Slander? |
|
|
306 | (1) |
|
|
306 | (3) |
|
1 The Statement Is Not Defamatory |
|
|
307 | (1) |
|
2 The Defamed Person Is Deceased |
|
|
307 | (1) |
|
|
307 | (1) |
|
|
308 | (1) |
|
|
309 | (1) |
|
G Damages in Defamation Cases |
|
|
309 | (1) |
|
H Constitutional Limits on Defamation Actions |
|
|
310 | (4) |
|
1 Analyzing a Defamation Case for Constitutional Implications |
|
|
310 | (1) |
|
2 The New York Times Rule |
|
|
311 | (2) |
|
3 The Shifting Standard Depending on the Plaintiff's Notoriety |
|
|
313 | (1) |
|
I Defamation in Cyberspace |
|
|
314 | (1) |
|
|
314 | (1) |
|
1 Intrude on a Person's Privacy |
|
|
314 | (1) |
|
2 Make Public Disclosure of Private Facts |
|
|
314 | (1) |
|
3 Use the Person's Name or Likeness Without Permission |
|
|
315 | (1) |
|
III analyzing a case of defamation |
|
|
315 | (1) |
|
Case Excerpt: Dongxiao Yue v. Wenbin Yang |
|
|
315 | (4) |
|
|
319 | (1) |
|
|
320 | (1) |
|
Skills You Need in the Real World |
|
|
320 | (2) |
|
Ethical Issues for the Paralegal |
|
|
322 | (1) |
|
|
322 | (1) |
|
|
323 | (3) |
|
Practice Questions for Test Review |
|
|
326 | (3) |
|
|
329 | (38) |
|
|
329 | (1) |
|
|
329 | (1) |
|
I The chumley case and malpractice |
|
|
330 | (1) |
|
II Introduction to professional malpractice |
|
|
330 | (1) |
|
|
331 | (11) |
|
A A Brief History of Medical Malpractice |
|
|
332 | (1) |
|
B Defining Medical Malpractice |
|
|
332 | (1) |
|
C What Is the Basis for a Medical Malpractice Case? |
|
|
332 | (1) |
|
|
333 | (1) |
|
|
333 | (1) |
|
|
334 | (1) |
|
D The Basic Elements of a Medical Malpractice Claim |
|
|
334 | (1) |
|
|
334 | (1) |
|
|
335 | (4) |
|
|
339 | (1) |
|
|
339 | (3) |
|
|
342 | (3) |
|
1 Statutory Requirements in Informed Consent |
|
|
343 | (1) |
|
|
344 | (1) |
|
3 Scope of Informed Consent |
|
|
344 | (1) |
|
F Pleadings in Medical Malpractice Cases |
|
|
345 | (1) |
|
G Discovery Issues in Medical Malpractice Cases |
|
|
346 | (1) |
|
H Defenses to Medical Malpractice Claims |
|
|
347 | (1) |
|
|
347 | (1) |
|
2 Contributory Negligence of the Patient |
|
|
347 | (1) |
|
IV the chumley case: follow-up on medical malpractice issue |
|
|
348 | (1) |
|
|
348 | (3) |
|
|
349 | (1) |
|
|
349 | (1) |
|
1 Additional Proof of Breach Required |
|
|
349 | (1) |
|
|
350 | (1) |
|
|
350 | (1) |
|
D Defenses in Legal Malpractice Cases |
|
|
351 | (1) |
|
VI other types of professional malpractice |
|
|
351 | (1) |
|
Case Excerpt: Gretencord-Szobar v. Kokoszka |
|
|
352 | (4) |
|
|
356 | (1) |
|
|
357 | (1) |
|
Skills You Need in the Real World |
|
|
357 | (1) |
|
Ethical Issues for the Paralegal |
|
|
358 | (1) |
|
|
359 | (1) |
|
|
359 | (4) |
|
Practice Questions for Test Review |
|
|
363 | (4) |
|
|
367 | (30) |
|
|
367 | (1) |
|
|
367 | (1) |
|
I Mr. chumley and the insurance company |
|
|
368 | (1) |
|
|
368 | (1) |
|
III A brief history of insurance |
|
|
369 | (1) |
|
|
370 | (1) |
|
|
370 | (2) |
|
|
370 | (1) |
|
B State Laws Regarding Insurance Policies |
|
|
371 | (1) |
|
|
372 | (7) |
|
A Statutory Minimum Liability Coverage |
|
|
372 | (1) |
|
|
373 | (1) |
|
|
374 | (1) |
|
3 Uninsured Motorist Coverage |
|
|
374 | (1) |
|
4 Underinsured Motorist Coverage |
|
|
374 | (1) |
|
B Important Provisions in Typical Automobile Policies |
|
|
375 | (1) |
|
|
375 | (1) |
|
|
376 | (1) |
|
|
376 | (1) |
|
|
377 | (1) |
|
|
378 | (1) |
|
|
378 | (1) |
|
|
379 | (1) |
|
VII how insurance coverage affects ettlement |
|
|
379 | (5) |
|
A Discovery Issues with Insurance |
|
|
379 | (1) |
|
B Specialization among Personal Injury Attorneys |
|
|
380 | (1) |
|
|
380 | (1) |
|
2 Insurance Defense Firms |
|
|
381 | (1) |
|
3 Bringing the Two Sides Together |
|
|
381 | (1) |
|
|
381 | (2) |
|
|
383 | (1) |
|
Case Excerpt: State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Swartz |
|
|
384 | (3) |
|
|
387 | (1) |
|
|
387 | (1) |
|
Skills You Need in the Real World |
|
|
388 | (2) |
|
Ethical Issues for the Paralegal |
|
|
390 | (1) |
|
|
391 | (1) |
|
|
391 | (4) |
|
Practice Questions for Test Review |
|
|
395 | (2) |
|
14 Fraud, misrepresentation, and business torts |
|
|
397 | (32) |
|
|
397 | (1) |
|
|
397 | (1) |
|
|
398 | (1) |
|
|
398 | (1) |
|
|
399 | (4) |
|
|
400 | (1) |
|
B Alleging Fraud in the Complaint |
|
|
401 | (1) |
|
C Limitations on Fraud Actions |
|
|
401 | (1) |
|
|
401 | (2) |
|
IV negligent misrepresentation |
|
|
403 | (3) |
|
A The Restatement Position on Negligent Misrepresentation |
|
|
403 | (1) |
|
B Elements of Negligent Misrepresentation |
|
|
404 | (1) |
|
C Traditional Tort Analysis for Negligent Misrepresentation |
|
|
404 | (1) |
|
1 Duty and Breach of Duty |
|
|
404 | (1) |
|
|
404 | (1) |
|
|
405 | (1) |
|
D Opinions and Negligent Misrepresentation |
|
|
405 | (1) |
|
E Negligent Misrepresentation Versus Mistake |
|
|
406 | (1) |
|
F Pleading Negligent Misrepresentation |
|
|
406 | (1) |
|
G Defenses to Negligent Misrepresentation |
|
|
407 | (2) |
|
|
407 | (1) |
|
|
408 | (1) |
|
3 Statement Did Not Concern a Material Fact |
|
|
408 | (1) |
|
4 No Detrimental Reliance on the Statement |
|
|
408 | (1) |
|
|
408 | (1) |
|
|
408 | (1) |
|
H Defenses That Are Unavailable in Negligent Misrepresentation |
|
|
409 | (1) |
|
|
409 | (1) |
|
|
409 | (1) |
|
|
409 | (1) |
|
V Interference with contract |
|
|
410 | (2) |
|
A Elements of Interference with Contract |
|
|
410 | (2) |
|
VI Deceptive trade practices |
|
|
412 | (1) |
|
VII Consumer protection laws |
|
|
412 | (1) |
|
|
413 | (1) |
|
A Quid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment |
|
|
413 | (1) |
|
B Hostile Environment Sexual Harassment |
|
|
414 | (1) |
|
|
414 | (1) |
|
|
414 | (2) |
|
A The Basic Premise of Workers' Compensation |
|
|
414 | (1) |
|
B Bringing a Claim under Workers' Compensation |
|
|
415 | (1) |
|
C The Issues in Workers' Compensation |
|
|
415 | (1) |
|
D Assigning Monetary Values to Injuries |
|
|
415 | (1) |
|
XI Follow-up on the shareholder's suit |
|
|
416 | (1) |
|
Case Excerpt: Barnes v. Smith |
|
|
417 | (2) |
|
|
419 | (1) |
|
|
419 | (1) |
|
Skills You Need in the Real World |
|
|
420 | (2) |
|
Ethical Issues for the Paralegal |
|
|
422 | (1) |
|
|
422 | (1) |
|
|
422 | (4) |
|
Practice Questions for Test Review |
|
|
426 | (3) |
Appendix A Chumley Case -- Client Material/Documents |
|
429 | (4) |
Appendix B Chumley Case -- Correspondence |
|
433 | (4) |
Appendix C Chumley Case -- Pleadings |
|
437 | (8) |
Appendix D Chumley Case -- Discovery |
|
445 | (8) |
Appendix E Chumley Case -- Medical |
|
453 | (4) |
Appendix F Excerpt from MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. |
|
457 | (4) |
Appendix G Answers to Review Questions and Practice Test Questions |
|
461 | (44) |
Glossary |
|
505 | (4) |
Index |
|
509 | |