Klientų aptarnavimas: +370 652 87781

Pagalba | Naujas vartotojas | Prisijungti

Tort Liability of Public Authorities in European Laws [Kietas viršelis]

Edited by Roberto Caranta (Professor of Administrative Law, University of Turin), Edited by Giacinto della Cananea (Professor of Administrative Law, Bocconi University)

Formatas: Hardback, 400 pages, aukštis x plotis x storis: 240x165x30 mm, weight: 760 g
Serija: The Common Core of European Administrative Law
Išleidimo metai: 15-Dec-2020
Leidėjas: Oxford University Press
ISBN-10: 0198867557
ISBN-13: 9780198867555

Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:

Constitutional & administrative law - (Šiuo metu turimos knygos: 1 prekės)
Comparative law - (Šiuo metu turimos knygos: 1 prekės)
Torts / Delicts

Kietas viršelis
Kaina: 171,55 €
Knygas pristatysime per 3-4 savaites.
Kiekis:
- - 1
  - 2
  - 3
  - 4
  - 5
  - 6
  - 7
  - 8
  - 9
  - 10
Įdėti į krepšelį
Pristatymas per 4-6 savaites
Įtraukti į pageidavimų sąrašą

Formatas: Hardback, 400 pages, aukštis x plotis x storis: 240x165x30 mm, weight: 760 g
Serija: The Common Core of European Administrative Law
Išleidimo metai: 15-Dec-2020
Leidėjas: Oxford University Press
ISBN-10: 0198867557
ISBN-13: 9780198867555

Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:

Constitutional & administrative law - (Šiuo metu turimos knygos: 1 prekės)
Comparative law - (Šiuo metu turimos knygos: 1 prekės)
Torts / Delicts

Pastovi nuoroda: https://www.kriso.lt/db/9780198867555.html

Raktažodžiai:

Government liability - Case studies - Europe

This series argues that there is a common administrative core to European legal systems that can be better understood in comparative terms. This volume examines government liability in tort, using case studies to explore different government responses.

Part I sets the stage for the project and the parameters followed by the scholars involved. Part II expands on the legal systems chosen for comparison, setting up their general tort procedures. Part III presents case studies from Austria, the European Union, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Romania, Spain, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. Each case study has a theoretical response detailing what would happen should that case occur within each country's borders. Part IV compares and contrasts the information provided in Part III. It examines both the commonalities and the distinctive traits of these legal systems, with a view to understand the nature of their 'common core'.

This volume is an essential tool for anyone involved in administrative and constitutional law and government liability in tort.

List of Abbreviations

xxiii

List of Contributors

xxxi

I THE `COMMON CORE' OF EUROPEAN ADMINISTRATIVE LAWS: AN INTRODUCTION

1 A `Common Core' Research On Government Liability In Tort: A Comparative Introduction

(20)

Giacinto della Cananea

I The nature and structure of the study

(1)

II A new comparative research

(2)

A A research for the advancement of knowledge

(1)

B Administrative law: a focus on process

(1)

C A diachronic and synchronic comparison

(1)

III Comparing government liability in tort

(5)

A Background: the importance of government liability in comparative studies

(1)

B A worst-case scenario?

(2)

C The European dimension of government liability

(1)

IV Issues in methodology

(6)

A A focus on administrative action: an evolutionary view

(2)

B The choice of legal systems

(2)

C The questionnaire and levels of analysis

(2)

V Implications for the study of the `common core' of European administrative laws

(5)

A A factual analysis

(1)

B Commonality and difference

(2)

C Divergences within convergence

(1)

VI The next steps

(1)

2 On The `Common Core Of European Administrative Laws' Methodology (And European Tort Laws)

(16)

Mauro Bussani

I Introduction

(1)

II European tort law

(4)

III And its scholars

(3)

IV The distinctiveness of the `Common Core' approach

(1)

V At the core of the `Common Core' method

(2)

VI The three-level responses

(1)

VII Caveats and promises

(5)

II THE LEGAL SYSTEMS SELECTED FOR COMPARISON: PRINCIPLES AND REMEDIES

3 Constitutional Foundations And The Design Of The Austrian Liability Of Public Bodies Act

(3)

Stefan Storr

Kathrin Bayer

Daniela Bereiter

Luca Mischensky

I Is there any formal constitutional provision concerning public authority liability?

(1)

II Is there any general requirement to bring an administrative appeal or a complaint before an ombudsman or other public agency before bringing an action for damages against public authorities?

(1)

III Are there different courts or other public agencies for the annulment of unlawful administrative decisions and for the award of damages?

(1)

4 The Eu Institutions Liability Between The Member States Principles And The Causality Standards Of The Eu Court Of Justice

(4)

Barbara Marchetti

I Is there any formal constitutional provision concerning public authority liability?

(1)

II Is there any general requirement to bring an administrative appeal or a complaint before an ombudsman or other public agency before bringing an action for damages against public authorities?

(1)

III Are there different courts or other public agencies for the annulment of unlawful administrative decisions and for the award of damages?

(2)

5 Government Liability In France: A Special Regime Under General Principles

(4)

Thomas Perroud

I Is there any formal constitutional provision concerning public authority liability?

(1)

II Is there any general requirement to bring an administrative appeal or a complaint before an ombudsman or other public agency before bringing an action for damages against public authorities?

(1)

III Are there different courts or other public agencies for the annulment of unlawful administrative decisions and for the award of damages?

(2)

6 The System Of Public Authority Liability In Germany

(5)

Ferdinand Wollenschlager

Johannes Stapf

I Is there any formal constitutional provision concerning public authority liability?

(2)

II Is there any general requirement to bring an administrative appeal or a complaint before an ombudsman or other public agency beforebringing an action for damages against public authorities?

(1)

III Are there different courts or other public agencies for the annulment of unlawful administrative decisions and for the award of damages?

(2)

7 Public Authority Liability In Hungary: Constitutional Principles And Judicial Remedies

(6)

Lilla Berkes

I Is there any formal constitutional provision concerning public authority liability?

(1)

II Is there any general requirement to bring an administrative appeal or a complaint before an ombudsman or other public agency before bringing an action for damages against public authorities?

(1)

III Are there different courts or other public agencies for the annulment of unlawful administrative decisions and for the award of damages?

(4)

8 The Liability Of Public Administration: A Special Regime Between Formal Requirements And Substantial Goals

(5)

Fulvio Cortese

I Is there any formal constitutional provision concerning public authority liability?

(3)

II Is there any general requirement to bring an administrative appeal or a complaint before an ombudsman or other public agency before bringing an action for damages against public authorities?

(1)

III Are there different courts or other public agencies for the annulment of unlawful administrative decisions and for the award of damages?

(1)

9 The Principles Governing Public Authority Liability In Poland

(3)

Marek Wierzbowski

Marek Grzywacz

Joanna Rog Dyrda

Katarzyna Ziolkowska

I Is there any formal constitutional provision concerning public authority liability?

(2)

II Is there any general requirement to bring an administrative appeal or a complaint before an ombudsman or other public agency before bringing an action for damages against public authorities?

(1)

III Are there different courts or other public agencies for the annulment of unlawful administrative decisions and for the award of damages?

(1)

10 Public Authority Liability In Romania

(4)

Roxana Vornicu

I Is there any formal constitutional provision concerning public authority liability?

(2)

II Is there any general requirement to carry out an administrative appeal or to bring a complaint before an ombudsman or another public agency before bringing an action for damages against public authorities?

(1)

III Are there different courts or other public agencies for the annulment of unlawful administrative decisions and for the award of damages?

(2)

11 Constitutional Foundations Of Government Liability In Spain

(4)

Eva Maria Nieto Garrido

I Is there any formal constitutional provision concerning public authority liability?

(1)

II Is there any general requirement to bring an administrative appeal or a complaint before an ombudsman or other public agency before bringing an action for damages against public authorities?

(1)

III Are there different courts or other public agencies for the annulment of unlawful administrative decisions and for the award of damages?

(2)

12 Constitutional Principles And Judicial Remedies In Switzerland

(3)

Thierry Tanquerel

I Is there any formal constitutional provision concerning public authority liability?

(1)

III Are there different courts or other public agencies for the annulment of unlawful administrative decisions and for the award of damages?

(2)

13 Public Authority Liability In The United Kingdom: A Common Law Perspective

(9)

Gordon Anthony

I Is there any formal constitutional provision concerning public authority liability?

(1)

II Is there any general requirement to carry an administrative appeal or to bring a complaint before an ombudsman or another public agency before bringing an action for damages against public authorities?

(1)

III Are there different courts or other public agencies for the annulment of unlawful administrative decisions and for the award of damages?

(5)

III CASES

The authors of the respective country reports in Cases 2-11 are the same as in Case 1 unless otherwise noted

14 Cases

(210)

I Questionnaire

(6)

A Case 1---the dismissal of a civil servant for improper conduct

(1)

B Case 2---an unjustified denial of licences for electronic communications

(1)

C Case 3---sanctions against a bank

(1)

D Case 4---the exclusion of a tenderer by the contracting authority

(1)

E Case 5---a delay in issuing a concession for the use of the waterfront

(1)

F Case 6---prohibiting fruit imports

(1)

G Case 7---a licence withdrawal inaudita altera parte

(1)

H Case 8---a licensed fisherman

(1)

I Case 9---suspending the sale of beauty creams

(1)

J Case 10---a negligent drug authority

(1)

K Case 11---a violent police officer

(2)

II Case 1---the dismissal of a civil servant for improper conduct

(31)

A Austria

(3)

Stefan Storr

Kathrin Bayer

Daniela Bereiter

Luca Mischensky

B European Union

(1)

Barbara Marchetti

C France

(3)

Thomas Perroud

D Germany

102

(6)

Ferdinand Wollenschlager

Johannes Stapf

E Hungary

108

(2)

Lilla Berkes

F Italy

110

(1)

Fulvio Cortese

G Poland

111

(5)

Aleksander Jakubowski

H Romania

116

(5)

Roxana Vornicu

I Spain

121

(1)

Eva Maria Nieto Garrido

J Switzerland

121

(1)

Thierry Tanquerel

K United Kingdom

122

(4)

Gordon Anthony

III Case 2---an unjustified denial of licences for electronic communications

126

(21)

A Austria

126

(1)

B European Union

127

(1)

C France

128

(2)

D Germany

130

(6)

E Hungary

136

(2)

F Italy

138

(1)

G Poland

139

(1)

Sebastian Wijas

H Romania

140

(2)

I Spain

142

(1)

J Switzerland

142

(1)

K United Kingdom

143

(4)

IV Case 3---sanctions against a bank

147

(17)

A Austria

147

(1)

B European Union

148

(1)

C France

148

(3)

D Germany

151

(2)

E Hungary

153

(2)

F Italy

155

(1)

G Poland

156

(2)

Dawid Ziotkowski

H Romania

158

(2)

I Spain

160

(1)

J Switzerland

160

(1)

K United Kingdom

161

(3)

V Case 4---the exclusion of a tenderer by the contracting authority

164

(23)

A Austria

164

(2)

B European Union

166

(1)

C France

167

(4)

D Germany

171

(5)

E Hungary

176

(1)

F Italy

177

(1)

G Poland

178

(2)

Dawid Ziolkowski

H Romania

180

(3)

I Spain

183

(1)

J Switzerland

184

(1)

K United Kingdom

185

(2)

VI Case 5---a delay in issuing a concession for the use of the waterfront

187

(14)

A Austria

187

(2)

B European Union

189

(1)

C France

190

(1)

D Germany

191

(2)

E Hungary

193

(1)

F Italy

194

(1)

G Poland

195

(1)

Sebastian Wijas

Marek Wierzbowski

H Romania

196

(1)

I Spain

197

(1)

J Switzerland

198

(1)

K United Kingdom

198

(3)

VII Case 6---prohibiting fruit imports

201

(16)

A Austria

201

(1)

B European Union

202

(1)

C France

203

(3)

D Germany

206

(3)

E Hungary

209

(1)

F Italy

210

(1)

G Poland

211

(2)

Katarzyna Chojecka

H Romania

213

(1)

I Spain

214

(1)

J Switzerland

214

(1)

K United Kingdom

215

(2)

VIII Case 7---a licence withdrawal inaudita altera parte

217

(19)

A Austria

217

(3)

B European Union

220

(1)

C France

220

(2)

D Germany

222

(2)

E Hungary

224

(1)

F Italy

225

(1)

G Poland

225

(3)

Lukas Dziamski

H Romania

228

(3)

I Spain

231

(1)

J Switzerland

232

(1)

K United Kingdom

233

(3)

IX Case 8---a licensed fisherman

236

(11)

A Austria

236

(1)

B European Union

237

(1)

C France

238

(1)

D Germany

239

(2)

E Hungary

241

(1)

F Italy

242

(1)

G Poland

243

(1)

Marek Wierzbowski

H Romania

243

(1)

I Spain

244

(1)

J Switzerland

244

(1)

K United Kingdom

245

(2)

X Case 9---suspending the sale of beauty creams

247

(12)

A Austria

247

(2)

B European Union

249

(1)

C France

250

(2)

D Germany

252

(1)

E Hungary

253

(1)

F Italy

254

(1)

G Poland

254

(2)

Lukas Dziamski

H Romania

256

(1)

I Spain

256

(1)

J Switzerland

256

(1)

K United Kingdom

257

(2)

XI Case 10---a negligent drug authority

259

(15)

A Austria

259

(1)

B European Union

260

(1)

C France

260

(3)

D Germany

263

(4)

E Hungary

267

(1)

F Italy

268

(1)

G Poland

268

(2)

Zbigniew Banaszczyk

Marek Wierzbowski

H Romania

270

(1)

I Spain

270

(1)

J Switzerland

270

(1)

K United Kingdom

271

(3)

XII Case 11---a violent police officer

274

(25)

A Austria

274

(1)

B European Union

275

(1)

C France

276

(3)

D Germany

279

(7)

E Hungary

286

(1)

F Italy

286

(1)

G Poland

287

(5)

Zofia Roguska

H Romania

292

(1)

I Spain

292

(1)

J Switzerland

293

(1)

K United Kingdom

293

(6)

IV COMPARATIVE ANALYSES

15 France, Italy, And Spain

299

(3)

Jean-Bernard Auby

I Comparison of general features

299

(1)

A Legal bases

299

(1)

1 Constitutions

299

(1)

2 Legislation

299

(1)

B Courts and procedures

299

(1)

1 Preliminary complaint before the administration or an ombudsman

299

(1)

2 Competent courts

300

(1)

C Other aspects

300

(1)

II Drawing from the case studies

300

(2)

A Conduct likely to give rise to administrative liability

300

(1)

1 The existence of a general concept of fault

300

(1)

2 Liability and unlawfulness

301

(1)

3 Liability without wrongdoing (strict liability)

301

(1)

B Some practical issues raised by the introduction of liability

301

(1)

1 Types of compensable damage

301

(1)

2 Nature of the remedy

301

(1)

16 France And The United Kingdom

302

(8)

Carol Harlow

I General context

302

(4)

A Is there any formal constitutional provision concerning public authority liability?

302

(1)

B Are there different courts or other public agencies for the annulment of unlawful administrative decisions and for the award of damages?

303

(3)

II Hypotheticals

306

(4)

17 Eu Law And Uk Law

310

(9)

Paul Craig

I General issues

310

(5)

A Is there any constitutional provision concerning public authority liability?

310

(3)

B Is there any general requirement to carry an administrative appeal or to bring a complaint before an ombudsman or another public agency before bringing an action for damages against public authorities?

313

(1)

C Are there different courts or other public agencies for the annulment of unlawful administrative decisions and for the award of damages?

314

(1)

II Hypotheticals

315

(4)

A The rules concerning procedural fairness and their application

315

(1)

B The rules concerning damages liability and their application

316

(3)

18 Austria, Germany, And Switzerland

319

(10)

Angela Ferrari Zumbini

Otto Pfersmann

I Introduction

319

(2)

A Background commonalities

319

(1)

B Background distinctive traits

320

(1)

II Constitutional provisions for public authority liability

321

(1)

III Dismissal without notice and hearing

322

(2)

IV A licence withdrawal inaudita altera parte

324

(1)

V Physical coercion: a violent police officer

325

(1)

VI Some cross-cut issues

325

(3)

A The distribution of competence between ordinary judges and administrative courts

325

(1)

B Liability for procedural errors or faults? do mere infringements of procedure always lead to government liability?

326

(1)

C Legal formants: constitution and legislation

327

(1)

VII Conclusion

328

(1)

19 Hungary, Poland, And Romania

329

(10)

Giacinto della Cananea

I Introduction

329

(1)

II Three post-1989 constitutions

329

(1)

III Same issues, same solutions?

330

(5)

A The State as employer

330

(1)

B The `negative' State

331

(2)

C The `positive' State

333

(1)

D Physical coercion

334

(1)

IV Assessing liability

335

(4)

A Legal formants

335

(1)

B Doctrines of essential procedural infringements'

336

(1)

C A shift away from immunity?

337

(2)

20 Concluding Remarks: Towards Convergence? The Road Beyond Institutional And Doctrinal Path-Dependence

339

(14)

Roberto Caranta

I Introduction

339

(2)

II Damages as a secondary remedy?

341

(2)

III More than illegality

343

(2)

IV Causation, discretion, and the role of courts

345

(4)

A Causation

345

(1)

B Discretion

346

(1)

C The role of courts

347

(2)

V Conclusions

349

(4)

Select Bibliography

353

(4)

Index

357

Giacinto della Cananea is a professor and leading authority on EU administrative law and comparative administrative law. His publications include five monographs, 20 edited volumes, and over 150 articles, book chapters, and comments to judicial decisions on national and EU administrative law, global administrative law, and public finances. He is a co-ordinator of ReNEUAL, and a member of the European Group of Public Law, the European Constitutional Law Network, the Societas Juris Public Europei, and the Dornburg Group of Administrative Law.

Roberto Caranta is a professor in the Law Department of the University of Turin (IT), and Director of the Master's Program on Public Procurement Management for Sustainable Development. He works on institutional issues of EU law, and specifically judicial review, environmental law, and public procurement law. He was the General rapporteur to the 2014 FIDE Congress in Copenhagen. He is an editor or co-editor of several texts including the European Procurement Law Series; Cost and EU Public Procurement Law:Life-Cycle Costing for Sustainability (2020); Transparency in EU Procurements (2019); and The Making of a New European Legal Culture: the Aarhus Convention (2018).

Tort Liability of Public Authorities in European Laws [Kietas viršelis]

Paskyra ir nustatymai

Paieška

Ieškoti duomenų bazėje

Patikslinti paiešką

Temos Temos anglų kalba

Pasirinkti pirkinių krepšelį