Bradford offers a solid sense that Mailer could be unpleasant. * Publishers Weekly * British academic Bradford seems to thrive [ ...] when sniping, deriding perceived flaws of style and soul. * Kirkus Reviews * absorbing [ ] Bradford draws from myriad sources to craft an indelible portrait of the artist as a fascinating, never-boring man. * Booklist * ... the books very existence attests to a more complicated reality. It would be naļve to suppose that the renewed attention on Mailer has nothing to do with the scandals attached to his name. It would also be naļve to pretend that he was not a great American writer. * The New Yorker * ... if this lively biography ends up being a damning speech for the prosecution, well, pugilistic old Norman is simply receiving a dose of his own medicine. You can imagine Mailers ghost becoming suitably energised to rise from his sulphurous grave to box Bradfords lights out. * The Times * compulsively readable[ a] solid multifaceted critique of Mailer * The National Review * ... there are some interesting asides and neat apercus. * The SundayTelegraph * Tough Guy: The Life of Norman Mailer brings the life of an epic personality down to earth for a modern-day re-evaluation. Author Richard Bradford writes of Mailers storied life in a fair and objective manner, leaving the reader to judge Mailers words and actions [ ] Bradfords book is as fascinating and awe-inspiring as his subject * City Book Review * the story itself is so gripping (even jaw-dropping) * Readers Digest * the book [ does a] careful investigation into the subtle, emotional aspects of power between men. * New Statesman * Tough Guy adequately charts the controversies, the scandals, the successes, and the failures in literature and in life of its complicated subject * The Washington Independent Review of Books * A good illustration of the risks of elevating Mailer to sainthood is found in a new biography. Richard Bradfords Tough Guy: The Life of Norman Mailer is a slender volume that tends to summarize huge amounts of information in single pages Bradfords hasty approach has the advantage of plainly and clearly stating Mailers profound limitationshe has a gift for making Mailer look and sound preposterous and rightly so. * Washington Examiner * Bradfords book has all the personal info you want to know * Truthdig * Tough Guy is well-written and lurid, its subject a cautionary tale [ it] will hold your attention. * Pittsburg Post-Gazette * [ H]e has a penchant thats incredibly refreshing in the 21st century because its so rare: he sometimes allows himself to dislike his subjects. This makes Tough Guy a bracing reading experience his analyses are also superb Norman Mailer would certainly have sued Richard Bradford over this book, and that should stand as its strongest recommendation. * Open Letters Review * queasily compelling a colourful and bracing read memorably scathing * The Business Post Ireland * Tough Guy makes a sturdy case for Mailer as, if not a great guy, the author of era-defining books and a cultural force worth reckoning with... Veteran biographer Bradford reliably illuminates how Mailer's work reflected his life at the time Bradford is unsparing in his criticism of Mailer. * Shelf Awareness * Bradford is a fluent narrator and provides a useful refresher on the salient details of a long and interesting life. Tough Guy will satisfy salacious appetites as it explores Mailers relational dynamics and sexual proclivities, his alcohol and drug use, his penchant for fisticuffs. Efficient and gossipy, Tough Guy does ample justice to Mailer the charismatic self-marketer, one of the baddest of the bad boys of postwar American literature. * Art Fuse * ... told in forensic detail by Richard Bradford... * Oldie * This may be the best biography Mailer deserves: for after all the best possible things have been said about Mailer, its hard to feel he made the most of his talent. * The New Republic *
