Acknowledgments |
|
xi | |
Introduction |
|
xiii | |
|
From principles of standardisation to a scientific study of terminology |
|
|
1 | (38) |
|
Terminology, a scientific discipline? |
|
|
2 | (2) |
|
The principles of the Vienna school for Terminology |
|
|
4 | (12) |
|
The first principle: the onomasiological perspective |
|
|
4 | (2) |
|
The second principle: concepts are clear-cut |
|
|
6 | (2) |
|
The third principle: concepts and terminological definitions |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
The fourth principle: the univocity principle |
|
|
10 | (4) |
|
Fifth principle: the synchrony principle |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
The limits that are posed on unprejudiced research in Terminology |
|
|
16 | (2) |
|
Traditional Terminology and Objectivism |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
Traditional Terminology and Dogma |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
Traditional Terminology and Standardisation |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
Different schools of Terminology |
|
|
18 | (4) |
|
Recent criticism on traditional Terminology |
|
|
22 | (12) |
|
|
23 | (2) |
|
Peter Weissenhofer: relative definiteness and determinacy |
|
|
25 | (2) |
|
Britta Zawada and Piet Swanepoel |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
|
31 | (2) |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
Conclusion: Terminology needs to widen its scope |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
Towards sociocognitive Terminology |
|
|
34 | (3) |
|
|
37 | (2) |
|
New propositions for Terminology |
|
|
39 | (34) |
|
New propositions for an alternative Terminology |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
Conceptualisation and Categorisation |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
|
44 | (10) |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
The special language of the life sciences |
|
|
46 | (6) |
|
Document types and textual archives |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
|
54 | (12) |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
Postmodernism and hermeneutics |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
Relevance for the methodology of Terminology |
|
|
56 | (2) |
|
|
58 | (2) |
|
The objectivist model of traditional Terminology in view of the semantic triangle |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
The integrated model of modern Terminology |
|
|
60 | (6) |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (5) |
|
Questioning the traditional definition |
|
|
66 | (2) |
|
Questioning the isomorphism principle |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
Category extension and metaphorical models |
|
|
69 | (2) |
|
A diachronic study of a prototype-structured category |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
|
71 | (2) |
|
From traditional definitions of concepts to templates of units of understanding |
|
|
73 | (52) |
|
Definitions of intron, blotting and biotechnology |
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
First unit of understanding: the entity intron |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
Second unit of understanding: the activity blotting |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
Third unit of understanding: the collective category biotechnology |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
Definability in terms of intension and extension |
|
|
79 | (16) |
|
The concept's position in a logical or ontological concept system |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
|
81 | (2) |
|
|
83 | (3) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
Prototype structure of units of understanding |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
|
88 | (3) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
92 | (2) |
|
Results of our investigation |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
|
95 | (23) |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
Variation in the intracategorial understanding |
|
|
97 | (3) |
|
Variation in the intercategorial understanding |
|
|
100 | (6) |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
Structuring factors in texts about biotechnology |
|
|
107 | (4) |
|
The complex nature of understanding a category |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
The history of biotechnology |
|
|
112 | (3) |
|
Intracategorial aspects or facets of biotechnology |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
Intercategorial structuring |
|
|
116 | (2) |
|
|
118 | (7) |
|
|
118 | (3) |
|
Consequences for the principles of definitions in descriptive Terminology |
|
|
121 | (4) |
|
|
125 | (30) |
|
A natural development towards univocity |
|
|
133 | (5) |
|
|
138 | (15) |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
|
139 | (5) |
|
The naming of molecular cloning |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
The invention of polymerase chain reaction |
|
|
145 | (2) |
|
Shifts in the semantic structure |
|
|
147 | (2) |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
|
150 | (3) |
|
Conclusion. The consequences for terminography |
|
|
153 | (2) |
|
The impact of metaphorical models on categorisarion and naming |
|
|
155 | (64) |
|
A definition and an overview of the theories of metaphor |
|
|
159 | (4) |
|
Metaphor in traditional Terminology |
|
|
163 | (3) |
|
|
166 | (6) |
|
The pre-structuralist era |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
|
167 | (4) |
|
Metaphor in cognitivist-experientialist semantics |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
A structuralist and a cognitivist approach to metaphor in the special language of the life sciences |
|
|
172 | (10) |
|
Metaphor in the language of biotechnology: a structuralist descriptive approach |
|
|
172 | (2) |
|
A network of metaphor models |
|
|
174 | (7) |
|
The study of metaphor in a text corpus on the life sciences |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
Metaphorical naming: the traces in language of m-ICMs |
|
|
182 | (23) |
|
|
184 | (11) |
|
DNA is Information in an Atlas of Maps |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
Genetic and geographical mapping |
|
|
195 | (3) |
|
Lexicalisations based on the analogy |
|
|
198 | (5) |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
Creative and didactic metaphor |
|
|
205 | (6) |
|
Example of text type 2 and text type 3 |
|
|
205 | (3) |
|
Scientific and didactic metaphorisation |
|
|
208 | (3) |
|
The diachrony of understanding |
|
|
211 | (5) |
|
Aspects of the history of the disciplines of the life sciences |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
Social factors influence the development of the life sciences |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
Technological factors influence the development of the life sciences |
|
|
214 | (2) |
|
Cognitive factors influence the development of the life sciences |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
Towards guidelines for the description of metaphorical models and the resulting lexicalisations |
|
|
216 | (3) |
|
Towards new ways of terminology description |
|
|
219 | (20) |
|
Theoretical issues in sociocognitive Terminology |
|
|
222 | (8) |
|
New principles for Terminology |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
Principle one: units of understanding |
|
|
223 | (2) |
|
Principle two: understanding is sorting cognitive models |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
Intracategorial and intercategorial structures |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
Categories have prototype structure |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
Principle three: template representation |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
Principle four: functionality of synonymy and polysemy |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
Principle five: cognitive models are constantly in transition |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
|
227 | (2) |
|
New methods for terminological analysis |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
Prototype structure analysis |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
|
230 | (4) |
|
Procedure for terminographical analysis |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
Three key issues of terminographical analysis |
|
|
232 | (2) |
|
|
234 | (5) |
|
The limitations of this work |
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
Suggestions for further research |
|
|
235 | (4) |
Bibliography |
|
239 | (16) |
Index |
|
255 | |