Foreword |
|
v | |
Acknowledgements |
|
vii | |
Abbreviations |
|
xv | |
|
|
xvii | |
|
Table of Legislation and Statutory Materials |
|
|
xxi | |
|
1 Introducing the CRPD: A New Approach to Equality and Non-Discrimination? |
|
|
1 | (34) |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
II Equality and Non-Discrimination: A New Approach for Disability Rights |
|
|
2 | (2) |
|
III The Complex and Intriguing Evolution of the Right to Equality in International Law |
|
|
4 | (20) |
|
A The Controversial `Sameness' Model |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
B Embracing the Symmetrical Approach at International Level |
|
|
6 | (2) |
|
C Is the Formal Approach Adequate to Combat Discrimination? |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
i The Shift Towards Substantive Equality: Acknowledging the Diversity |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
ii Substantive Equality Jurisprudence |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
iii Affirmative Actions as Special Measures to Achieve Equality |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
D Beyond Differences: Time to Recognise Social Barriers and Positive Duties |
|
|
12 | (2) |
|
E The Prohibition of Discrimination under the CRPD: A New Inclusive Model |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
i The Case of HM versus Sweden |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
ii The Substantive Content of the Non-Discrimination Requirement |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
F Defining the Concept of Multiple and Intersectional Discrimination |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
i The Unsatisfactory One-Dimensional Approach to Discrimination |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
ii Intersectional Equality under the CRPD: Women and Children with Disabilities |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
IV The CRPD's Model of Disability: From a Social Construct Towards a Human Rights Approach |
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
V Reconceptualising the Human Rights Dichotomy |
|
|
26 | (9) |
|
A Disability Rights are Universal and Indivisible: Do Civil and Political Rights also Demand Economic Resources? |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
B Disability Rights as (Quasi)-Justiciable Rights |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
i The Right to Control One's Own Financial Affairs |
|
|
30 | (2) |
|
ii Debunking the Argument of the `Progressive Realisation of Socio-Economic Rights' |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
iii The Peculiar Case of Accessibility: A Bridge between Civil-Political and Socio-Economic Rights? |
|
|
33 | (2) |
|
2 The New Role for Civil Society under the CRPD |
|
|
35 | (20) |
|
I The Rise of Civil Society in Global Governance |
|
|
35 | (4) |
|
A Participatory Democracy and Global Governance |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
B Opening Up the Decision-Making Process |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
C Ensuring Transparent Procedures |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
II Mainstreaming Disability in the International Agenda |
|
|
39 | (9) |
|
A `Nothing about us without us': A Commitment to Participatory Democracy |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
i The Participation of Persons with Disabilities in the Ad Hoc Committee |
|
|
40 | (2) |
|
ii The Working Group on the Convention: Mixing State Delegates and Stakeholders |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
iii Civil Society's Main Achievements |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
III Civil Society's Role in Implementing the CRPD at National Level |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
A Institutionalising Civil Society |
|
|
45 | (2) |
|
B Awareness-Raising: A Synergetic Action between States Parties and NGOs |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
IV Participatory Democracy in the EU: From the White Paper to the Lisbon Treaty |
|
|
48 | (7) |
|
A The Inclusive Process of the EUCFR's Adoption: The `Convention' Method |
|
|
50 | (2) |
|
B How to Improve EU Participatory Democracy? The Good Practice of the CRPD |
|
|
52 | (3) |
|
3 Ten Years after EU Accession to the CRPD: From Theory to Reality |
|
|
55 | (36) |
|
I An Overview of the Prohibition of Discrimination under EU Law |
|
|
55 | (3) |
|
A The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
B The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
II Disability Rights in the EU |
|
|
58 | (2) |
|
III The EU Anti-Discrimination Framework: Directive 2000778/EC |
|
|
60 | (3) |
|
A Exploring the Meaning of Direct Discrimination |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
B Introducing the Concept of Indirect Discrimination |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
C Reasonable Accommodation: The Paramount Obligation |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
IV Filling in the Gap: The Evolving Concept of Disability |
|
|
63 | (13) |
|
A The EU Approach to Disability |
|
|
63 | (2) |
|
i A First Controversial Approach of the CJEU |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
ii Chacon Navas: A Missed Opportunity |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
B An Intriguing Evolution: The Case of Ring and Skouboe Werge |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
ii Defining Disability and the Personal Scope of the Directive |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
iii Reasonable Accommodation as Adaptation of Working Hours? |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
iv Addressing Indirect Discrimination: Legitimate Aim, Necessity and Proportionality |
|
|
71 | (2) |
|
v A Significant, but Incomplete, Development for EU Equality Law |
|
|
73 | (3) |
|
C Obesity and Disability: The Case of Kaltofi v Municipality of Billund |
|
|
76 | (15) |
|
i The Prohibition of Discrimination on Grounds of Obesity |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
ii The Prohibition of Discrimination in the Labour Market: The CJEU's Minimalist Approach |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
iii Is Obesity a Disability under the Equality Framework Directive? |
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
iv Should Obesity be Considered a Disability? |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
D The Case of Daouidi: Clarifying the Long-Term Nature of the Impairment |
|
|
81 | (2) |
|
E Absence from Work on Grounds of Sickness: The Case of Ruiz Conejero |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
i Factual Background and CJEU Key Findings |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
ii Drawing the Line between Illness and Disability |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
F Defining Disability beyond the Labour Market: The Case of Glatzel |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
i The Problematic CJEU Assessment |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
ii The Role of the CRPD: A Confusing Approach |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
iii The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Narrow Interpretation |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
G Is the CJEU Still a Real Promoter of Disability Rights? |
|
|
89 | (2) |
|
4 The EU Legal Framework: Associative and Intersectional Discrimination |
|
|
91 | (20) |
|
I Discrimination by Association on Grounds of Disability |
|
|
91 | (6) |
|
A The Coleman Case: Factual Background |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
B The Advocate General's Opinion |
|
|
92 | (2) |
|
C Analysis of the Judgment: Who Falls under the Protection of Discrimination by Association? |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
D The Controversial Nature of Reasonable Accommodation |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
E Concluding Remarks: A Shift Towards Substantive Equality |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
II Why Does Multiple and Intersectional Discrimination Matter? |
|
|
97 | (2) |
|
III The Odar Case: Disability and Age Discrimination |
|
|
99 | (2) |
|
IV Surjit Singh Bedi v Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Collective Agreement and Intersectional Discrimination |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
V The Case of Z v A Government Department: Gender and Disability |
|
|
102 | (9) |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
B How to Deal with Multiple and Intersectional Discrimination under EU Law |
|
|
104 | (2) |
|
C The Failure to Apply the Human Rights Model of Disability |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
D The Complex Interplay between International Law and EU Law |
|
|
106 | (2) |
|
E The Incongruous CJEU Reasoning: Time for a Change |
|
|
108 | (3) |
|
5 EU Governance and the Framework for Monitoring the CRPD |
|
|
111 | (39) |
|
I Ratifying and Implementing the UN Convention: Winners and Losers in the EU Institutional Game |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
II The Negotiations of the CRPD and the EU |
|
|
112 | (4) |
|
A The Commission's Contribution to the Drafting of the CRPD |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
B Ensuring Coordination between Various EU Actors |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
C The Commission and the Union's External Policy Representation |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
III Monitoring the CRPD's Implementation: New Governance Mechanisms |
|
|
116 | (7) |
|
A The Experimentalist Paradigm |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
B The Open Method of Coordination (OMC) |
|
|
118 | (2) |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
D Coordination Mechanism between the EU and the Member States |
|
|
121 | (2) |
|
IV The EU Framework for Promoting, Protecting and Monitoring the CRPD |
|
|
123 | (27) |
|
A The Commission's Experimentalist Approach |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
B The European Parliament and the Protection of Disability Rights |
|
|
126 | (2) |
|
i The PETI's Main Tasks and Achievements |
|
|
128 | (2) |
|
ii The Disability Intergroup of the European Parliament |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
i The Ombudsman's Own Initiatives |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
ii The Ombudsman's Limited Mandate |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
D The Monitoring Role of the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights |
|
|
133 | (2) |
|
E The EDF's Challenge to Open Up the EU Decision-Making Process |
|
|
135 | (3) |
|
F Focal Point and Coordination Mechanism: Innovative or Inefficient Practices? |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
V Light and Shadow in the EU Independent Framework |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
A The Commission's Withdrawal from the Framework: What Next? |
|
|
139 | (2) |
|
B Is the European Parliament Marginalised? |
|
|
141 | (3) |
|
C Is the OMC Appropriate? |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
i An Overview of the Reporting Mechanism |
|
|
144 | (2) |
|
ii Enhancing the EU Independent Framework: Some Suggestions |
|
|
146 | (2) |
|
iii Proposal to Upgrade and Simplify the EU Independent Framework to Implement the CRPD |
|
|
148 | (2) |
|
6 Conclusion: Time to Unleash the CRPD's Full Potential |
|
|
150 | (12) |
|
I The EU Legal Framework: Main Findings |
|
|
150 | (8) |
|
A The Definition of Disability: A Missed Opportunity |
|
|
150 | (2) |
|
B The Legal Gaps in Addressing Multiple and Intersectional Discrimination |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
C Indirect Discrimination and Reasonable Accommodation: Towards a Better Judicial Interpretation? |
|
|
153 | (2) |
|
D The Inclusive Equality Paradigm under the CRPD |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
E The Complicated Relationship between the CRPD and the EU Legal System |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
F Key Recommendations for Improving the Interpretation of EU Equality Norms |
|
|
156 | (2) |
|
II EU Governance: Main Findings |
|
|
158 | (3) |
|
A The Importance of Reforming the EU Independent Framework |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
B Key Recommendations for Improving EU Governance Mechanisms |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
C Good Governance and Participatory Democracy: The CPRD's Positive Practice |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
III Time to Unleash the CRPD's Full Potential |
|
|
161 | (1) |
Bibliography |
|
162 | (11) |
Index |
|
173 | |