Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Violent Language and Its Use in Religious Conflicts in Elizabethan England: Discourses on Values and Norms in the Marprelate Controversy (1588/89) New edition [Kietas viršelis]

Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:

Employing historical discourse analysis, this study analyses concepts of language in Elizabethan normative sources and the Marprelate controversy. It shows under which circumstances Elizabethans understood language as violence. It also shows that in theological controversy language concepts were used in legitimation and de-legitimation strategies.



Elizabethans saw eloquent language as the mark of the civilized gentleman. At the same time, they believed language to be able to harm, analogous to physical violence. Such concepts of language have important implications for the study of religious controversies of the time, in which the authors often attacked each other harshly via printed language. Employing historical discourse analysis, this study analyses Elizabethan concepts of violent language and shows under which circumstances Elizabethans understood language use as violence. In a second step, the main contributions in one of the most notorious theological controversies of the time, the Marprelate controversy, are analysed in terms of how these concepts of violent language were used as strategies of legitimation and de-legitimation.

Introduction 9(24)
1 The Religious Field and the Violence of Printed Theological Controversies in Elizabethan England
33(38)
1.1 The English Reformation
33(6)
1.2 Elizabethan Inner-Protestant Controversies
39(32)
1.2.1 Elizabethan Press Censorship
39(10)
1.2.2 The Vestments Controversy
49(4)
1.2.3 The Admonition Controversy
53(5)
1.2.4 The Marprelate Controversy
58(13)
2 Violent Language in Elizabethan Speech Ethics
71(52)
2.1 General Remarks
71(2)
2.2 Biblical Speech Ethics
73(13)
2.2.1 Violent Language in the Psalms
77(2)
2.2.2 Violent Language in the Book Sirach
79(2)
2.2.3 Violent Language in the Epistle of James
81(2)
2.2.4 The Sins of the Tongue
83(3)
2.3 Sixteenth-Century English Concepts of Language
86(14)
2.3.1 Renaissance Rhetoric
86(8)
2.3.2 Civility and Conduct
94(6)
2.4 Violent Language in Elizabethan Rhetoric and Letter Writing Manuals
100(9)
2.5 Violent Language in Two Elizabethan Conduct Manuals
109(11)
2.6 Conclusions
120(3)
3 Language and Violence in Forms of Legitimation and De-legitimation in the Marprelate Controversy
123(90)
3.1 Legitimacy, Legitimation and De-legitimation
123(8)
3.2 Forms of De-/Legitimation in Theological Controversies
131(19)
3.2.1 Forms of De-/Legitimation in the Admonition Controversy
131(6)
3.2.2 Forms of De-/Legitimation in the Marprelate Tracts
137(6)
3.2.3 Forms of De-/Legitimation in the Anti-Martinist Works
143(7)
3.3 Concepts of Language in the Marprelate Controversy
150(61)
3.3.1 Controversy as Physical
151(1)
3.3.1.1 Marprelate: Honour, Duel, War and Sport
151(11)
3.3.1.2 The Anti-Martinists: The Word as a Weapon, the Tongue as a Serpent
162(7)
3.3.1.3 Marprelate's Threats of Popularity and Print
169(5)
3.3.2 Explanations of Marprelate's Violent Language
174(1)
3.3.2.1 Language-Based Characterizations of Marprelate
174(15)
3.3.2.2 Violent Language as Satan's Working in the World
189(4)
3.3.2.3 Political Dangers of Violent Language
193(8)
3.3.3 Juxtaposing Controversy and Illegitimate Violence in the Last Marprelate Tract
201(10)
3.4 Conclusions
211(2)
Conclusion 213(6)
List of Table 219(2)
Bibliography 221
Sarah Ströer studied English Philology, History and Religious Studies at the Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität in Münster. She was a research assistant at the "Religion and Politics" Cluster of Excellence in Münster.