'So many intriguing puzzles here. Why do governments provide services to those who cannot request them, such as the severely mentally ill? Why do countries with similar health systems or welfare states diverge when it comes to mental health policy? Perera's fascinating, one-of-a-kind analysis focusing on welfare state workers and public managers is a seminal contribution not just to the study of mental health but also to the comparative study of social policy.' Andrea Louise Campbell, Arthur and Ruth Sloan Professor of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology 'An incredibly important and original book. Perera persuasively shows that understanding the contemporary welfare state requires understanding the organization of its workforce in theorizing how different workermanagement relationships shape the politics of welfare. The result is a beautifully written and insightful take on the evolution of mental healthcare in advanced democracies, and one that opens a new lens on one of the most central, and largely unexamined, parts of the modern state.' Jane Gingrich, Professor of Social Policy, University of Oxford 'Masterfully marshaling comparative evidence and reasoning, Perera proves that because the mentally ill are a politically silent minority, and because more populous and economically powerful interest groups have little at stake, the agents, causal pathways, and outcomes in mental health policy deviate strikingly from patterns of change across countries in more extensively researched welfare state arenas.' Peter Swenson, Charlotte Marion Saden Professor of Political Science, Yale University
