Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

El. knyga: What It Is Like To Perceive: Direct Realism and the Phenomenal Character of Perception

(Professor of Philosophy and Cognitive Science, University of Arizona)
  • Formatas: 352 pages
  • Išleidimo metai: 15-Jun-2018
  • Leidėjas: Oxford University Press Inc
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780190854775
  • Formatas: 352 pages
  • Išleidimo metai: 15-Jun-2018
  • Leidėjas: Oxford University Press Inc
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780190854775

DRM apribojimai

  • Kopijuoti:

    neleidžiama

  • Spausdinti:

    neleidžiama

  • El. knygos naudojimas:

    Skaitmeninių teisių valdymas (DRM)
    Leidykla pateikė šią knygą šifruota forma, o tai reiškia, kad norint ją atrakinti ir perskaityti reikia įdiegti nemokamą programinę įrangą. Norint skaityti šią el. knygą, turite susikurti Adobe ID . Daugiau informacijos  čia. El. knygą galima atsisiųsti į 6 įrenginius (vienas vartotojas su tuo pačiu Adobe ID).

    Reikalinga programinė įranga
    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą mobiliajame įrenginyje (telefone ar planšetiniame kompiuteryje), turite įdiegti šią nemokamą programėlę: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą asmeniniame arba „Mac“ kompiuteryje, Jums reikalinga  Adobe Digital Editions “ (tai nemokama programa, specialiai sukurta el. knygoms. Tai nėra tas pats, kas „Adobe Reader“, kurią tikriausiai jau turite savo kompiuteryje.)

    Negalite skaityti šios el. knygos naudodami „Amazon Kindle“.

Naturalistic cognitive science, when realistically rendered, rightly maintains that to think is to deploy contentful mental representations. Accordingly, conscious perception, memory, and anticipation are forms of cognition that, despite their introspectively manifest differences, may coincide in content. Sometimes we remember what we saw; other times we predict what we will see. Why, then, does what it is like consciously to perceive, differ so dramatically from what it is like merely to recall or anticipate the same? Why, if thought is just representation, does the phenomenal character of seeing a sunset differ so stunningly from the tepid character of recollecting or predicting the sun's descent?

J. Christopher Maloney argues that, unlike other cognitive modes, perception is in fact immediate, direct acquaintance with the object of thought. Although all mental representations carry content, the vehicles of perceptual representation are uniquely composed of the very objects represented. To perceive the setting sun is to use the sun and its properties to cast a peculiar cognitive vehicle of demonstrative representation. This vehicle's embedded referential term is identical with, and demonstrates, the sun itself. And the vehicle's self-attributive demonstrative predicate is itself forged from a property of that same remote star. So, in this sense, the perceiving mind is an extended mind. Perception is unbrokered cognition of what is real, exactly as it really is. Maloney's theory of perception will be of great interest in the philosophy of mind and cognitive science.


Recenzijos

Maloney's project is original, ambitious, and timely. His book is one of the first to elaborate a view about the metaphysical nature of perception that is explicitly predicated on a version of the extended mind hypothesis. It engages admirably with decades of conceptual arguments concerning the representational structure of perception and the prospects for direct (and naive) realism. * Lauren Olin, University of Missouri-St. Louis, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews * Maloney's theory is a valuable contribution to the philosophy of perception, admirable for its originality and for the breadth of philosophical and scientific work it synthesizes. Along with his book's interest for specialists, its systematic presentation of issues and positions prominent in recent philosophy and psychology of perception provides advanced nonspecialists with a useful introduction to the field. * Justin Christy, Metascience *

Acknowledgments xi
Introduction xiii
1 What Is What It Is Like? xiii
1 Initial Assumptions xv
3 Intentionalism and Higher Order Theory xvi
4 Advertisement of Direct Realism xviii
5 The Hypothesis of the Extended Mind xxi
6 Disjunctivism Denied xxii
1 Intentionalism and Recurrent Cognitive Content
1(18)
1 What Is What It Is Like?
1(3)
2 Qualitative versus Subjective Character
4(2)
3 The Forks of Intentionalism: Reductive and Not
6(3)
4 Intentionalism's Doctrine of Nonrecurrent Perceptual Content
9(1)
4.1 Tense and the Doctrine of Nonrecurrent Perceptual Content
10(4)
4.2 The Rich Content Thesis and the Doctrine of Nonrecurrent Perceptual Content
14(1)
4.3 The Master Argument Bedeviling Intentionalism
15(4)
2 Intentionalism, Cognition, and Representation
19(1)
1 The Cognitive Face of Experience
19(3)
2 Representations and Propositions
22(4)
3 Minimal and Maximal Intentionalism
26(2)
4 Intentionalism and Perceptual Attitudes
28(2)
5 Getting the Given from the Gotten
30(4)
5.1 The Supervenience of Character on Content
34(3)
5.2 The Identification of Phenomenal Character with Perceptual Content
37(3)
3 Intentionalism's Troubles Begin
40(18)
1 Intentionalism's Puzzling Exportation of Phenomenal Character
40(2)
2 Two Questions for Intentionalism
42(2)
2.1 Coincident Perceptual Content but Divergent Phenomenal Character
44(1)
2.2 Perceptual Content
45(4)
3 Byrne's Argument for Minimal Intentionalism
49(2)
4 Objections to Byrne's Argument
51(7)
4.1 Recurrent Content and Attitude Proliferation
53(2)
4.2 Reasoning within Experience
55(3)
4 Intentionalism and Troubling Peculiar Perceptual Content
58(1)
1 Intentionalism and Troubling Peculiar Perceptual Content
58(2)
2 Plenitudinous versus Parsimonious Perceptual Content
60(1)
2.1 Attention and Smudge
61(5)
2.2 Mnemonic Amplification
66(1)
2.3 Memory Systems
67(2)
2.4 Idle Mnemonic Residue
69(2)
3 Fine-Grained Content
71(19)
3.1 Concepts as Constituents of Mental Representations
73(2)
3.2 Conceptual and Nonconceptual Content
75(1)
3.3 Nonconceptual Content as Immature Conceptual Content
76(10)
3.4 Poised Perceptual Content
86(4)
4 Fineness of Grain Reconsidered
90(1)
4.1 Cognitively Penetrable Perception
90(4)
4.2 Cognitive Penetration and Cognitive Rehearsal
94(1)
5 Sperling on Perception and Memory
95(6)
5.1 Sperling's Hypothesis and Intentionalism
101(2)
5.2 Sperling's Hypothesis Rejected
103(3)
5.3 Mnemonic Preservation
106(1)
5.4 Phillips on Postdiction
107(2)
5.5 Reply to Phillips
109(2)
5 Higher Order Theory
111(1)
1 Representations Represented
111(1)
1.1 Is Phenomenal Character Relational?
112(4)
1.2 Thinking about Perceiving
116(1)
2 Transparency and Higher Order Theory (HOT)
117(2)
3 Unconscious Perception
119(1)
3.1 Unconscious or Forgotten Experience?
120(1)
3.2 Unsuffered Phenomenal Character
121(5)
3.3 On Behalf of Mnemonic Lapse
126(1)
4 Unconscious Phenomenal Character
127(5)
5 Rosenthal's Rendition of Higher Order Theory
132(1)
5.1 First Order versus Higher Order Mental Representations
133(4)
5.2 Overt versus Covert HOT Production
137(5)
5.3 The Attractions of Rosenthal's Higher Order Theory
142(2)
6 Objections to Higher Order Theory
144(1)
6.1 Goldman against Relationally Determined Phenomenal Character
144(2)
6.2 Impossible Phenomenal Character
146(3)
6.3 Bogus Phenomenal Character
149(1)
6.4 Recurrent HOTs without Recurrent Phenomenal Character
150(2)
6 Dual Aspect Theory
152(1)
1 Carruthers on Consciousness
152(2)
1.1 The Dual Functions of Perception
154(2)
1.2 Dual Representation
156(2)
1.3 Unconscious Perception and the Unemployed Attitude Manager
158(1)
1.4 A Brief Interlude on Narrow-Content
159(7)
1.5 Narrow Dual Content of the Attitude Manager's Representations
166(2)
1.5.1 The Narrow-Content of HOT-RED
168(1)
1.5.2 The Narrow-Content of RED
168(1)
1.5.3 Sufferance of Phenomenal Character According to Dual-Content Theory
169(3)
2 Objections to Dual-Content Theory
172(1)
2.1 Cognitive Ambiguity
172(4)
2.2 Dual Narrow-Content for the Movement Manager
176(4)
2.3 Logical Structure and Phenomenal Character
180(2)
2.4 Disjunctive First Order Content
182(1)
2.5 Dissolved Dispositions and Persistent Phenomenal Character
183(2)
2.6 Actors in Representational Roles
185(3)
7 Direct Realism and the Extended Mind
188(1)
1 A Fresh Representationalist Theory of Phenomenal Character
188(4)
2 The Representational Theory of Mind Revisited and Revised
192(3)
3 Demonstrative Reference and the Hypothesis of the Extended Mind
195(3)
3.1 Demonstrative Reference in Perception
196(7)
3.2 Perceptual Demonstratives
203(2)
3.3 The Hypothesis of the Extended Mind
205(7)
4 The Phenomenal Character of Perceptual Experience According to Direct Realism
212(5)
5 Self-Representation
217(2)
6 Direct Realism Depicted
219(4)
7 Some Reasons Favorable to Direct Realism
223(5)
7.1 The Best Explanation of Phenomenal Character
224(2)
7.2 Phenomenal Character, Transparency, and Direct Realism
226(2)
8 Acquaintance and the Objective Character of Perception
228(5)
9 Phenomenal Similarity, Change Blindness, and Direct Realism
233(5)
10 Objections to Direct Realism
238(2)
8 Direct Realism and Illusion
240(1)
1 Illusion
240(1)
1.1 Conditions of Observation
241(6)
1.2 The Conjecture of Relative Property Identity
247(2)
1.3 Demonstrative Predication in Perception
249(4)
1.4 Inference, Conceptualization, and Recognition
253(1)
1.4.1 Rudimentary and Sophisticated Perceptual Conceptualization
253(2)
1.4.2 Inference and Perceptual Conceptualization
255(5)
2 Neo-Whorfian Perceptual Conceptualization
260(6)
2.1 Neo-Whorfian Conceptual Ascension
266(4)
2.2 Mitigating Perceptual Conceptualization
270(3)
2.3 How Conditions of Observation Mitigate Perceptual Conceptualization
273(4)
2.4 Logically Sophisticated Perceptual Conceptualization
277(4)
3 Aspect Alteration
281(6)
9 Direct Realism and Hallucination
287(1)
1 Hallucination and Thoughts about Nonexistents
287(1)
1.1 Fictivism
288(4)
1.2 Disjunctivism
292(3)
2 Problems for Fictivism and Disjunctivism
295(8)
2.1 Fictivism's Problems
295(2)
2.2 Disjunctivism's Problems
297(6)
3 Selective Eliminativism on Behalf of Direct Acquaintance
303(8)
3.1 Selective Eliminativism Advertised
305(4)
3.2 Selective Eliminativism and the Proper Conception of Hallucination
309(2)
4 Hallucination Properly Conceived
311(1)
4.1 Hallucination and a Scene's Census
311(4)
4.2 Macbeth's Dagger
315(3)
4.3 Veridical Hallucination
318(2)
4.4 E Pluribus Unum
320(4)
4.5 Perception and the Past
324(3)
5 Inverted and Absent Phenomenal Character
327(3)
6 Blindsight
330(1)
6.1 Blindsight and Internal Perceptual Representation
330(4)
6.2 Blindsight and Unacknowledged Awareness
334(1)
7 Subliminal Priming and Unconscious Perception
335(2)
Works Cited 337(18)
Index 355
J. Christopher Maloney is Professor of Philosophy and Cognitive Science at the University of Arizona. He began his career at Oakland University after completing his doctorate at Indiana University. His interests and publications center on foundational issues in the intersection of the philosophy of mind and cognitive science.