|
|
xxi | |
|
|
xxii | |
|
1 When Children Kill Children |
|
|
1 | (28) |
|
|
1 | (8) |
|
|
1 | (6) |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
|
9 | (10) |
|
|
11 | (5) |
|
English crime and politics |
|
|
16 | (2) |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
Addressing Penal Populism |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
|
21 | (2) |
|
|
23 | (6) |
|
2 Culture, Politics, and the Media in Norway and England |
|
|
29 | (24) |
|
Cultural and Historical Backdrop |
|
|
30 | (5) |
|
Child education and well-being |
|
|
31 | (2) |
|
Social solidarity and the welfare state |
|
|
33 | (2) |
|
Political Economy and Economic Conditions |
|
|
35 | (2) |
|
|
37 | (6) |
|
Consensus versus majoritarian democracy |
|
|
37 | (3) |
|
|
40 | (3) |
|
Media Markets and Cultures |
|
|
43 | (8) |
|
|
43 | (5) |
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
|
51 | (2) |
|
3 Crime and Punishment in Norway and England |
|
|
53 | (24) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
|
54 | (4) |
|
|
54 | (3) |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
|
58 | (9) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
Prison regimes and conditions |
|
|
60 | (3) |
|
|
63 | (2) |
|
|
65 | (2) |
|
|
67 | (5) |
|
The Nordic diversionary consensus |
|
|
67 | (2) |
|
|
69 | (3) |
|
Public Attitudes toward Crime and Punishment |
|
|
72 | (4) |
|
|
72 | (4) |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
4 The Constraints and Effects of Political Culture |
|
|
77 | (18) |
|
|
77 | (3) |
|
|
80 | (3) |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
The Constraints of Political Culture |
|
|
83 | (7) |
|
|
86 | (2) |
|
|
88 | (2) |
|
High-Profile Cases and the `Crisis-Reform Thesis' |
|
|
90 | (4) |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
5 The Constraints of Discourse |
|
|
95 | (22) |
|
Discourse and `Knowledge Utilization' |
|
|
97 | (2) |
|
|
99 | (8) |
|
|
102 | (3) |
|
The constraints of `interpretive repertoires' |
|
|
105 | (2) |
|
Discourse and sensibilities |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
Six Reasons to Study Discourse |
|
|
107 | (6) |
|
|
113 | (4) |
|
6 Media Constraints and the Formation of Political Opinions |
|
|
117 | (24) |
|
The Evolution of Political Communication Research |
|
|
118 | (3) |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
Claims-Making and the Dangers of Discourse Homogeneity |
|
|
121 | (7) |
|
Media Frames and Discursive Constraints |
|
|
128 | (7) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
|
131 | (2) |
|
|
133 | (2) |
|
The Formation of Political Opinions |
|
|
135 | (2) |
|
|
137 | (4) |
|
7 Contextualizing Tragedy |
|
|
141 | (48) |
|
|
142 | (7) |
|
Theoretical underpinnings |
|
|
143 | (2) |
|
|
145 | (2) |
|
|
147 | (2) |
|
|
149 | (3) |
|
|
152 | (3) |
|
Comparing the Legitimacy of Elite Experts |
|
|
155 | (9) |
|
|
159 | (2) |
|
The status of the `ologists' |
|
|
161 | (3) |
|
Child-on-Child Killings in Perspective |
|
|
164 | (3) |
|
Legitimating Claims and the Silent Opposition |
|
|
167 | (2) |
|
Comparing Frames, Themes, and Angles |
|
|
169 | (11) |
|
Marking off the discursive terrain |
|
|
169 | (4) |
|
Begotten, not made: evil and innocence |
|
|
173 | (7) |
|
Comparing Rhetorical Strategies: Rhetoric and Resonance |
|
|
180 | (4) |
|
The Suitability of Vehicles |
|
|
184 | (3) |
|
|
187 | (2) |
|
8 English Penal Policy Climates and Political Culture |
|
|
189 | (32) |
|
The Post-Bulger Case Penal Climate |
|
|
190 | (10) |
|
The merging of discourses |
|
|
190 | (3) |
|
The pressure to get tough fast |
|
|
193 | (5) |
|
|
198 | (2) |
|
The Evolution of English Penal Policy and Political Culture |
|
|
200 | (7) |
|
Insulated elite dominance |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
Populism and the public voice |
|
|
204 | (3) |
|
The Press, the Public, and Political Culture |
|
|
207 | (7) |
|
New Labour and the `red top' press |
|
|
207 | (3) |
|
The rise of the public voice |
|
|
210 | (4) |
|
New Labour, Old Testament? |
|
|
214 | (4) |
|
|
218 | (3) |
|
9 Political Culture, Legitimacy, and Penal Populism |
|
|
221 | (20) |
|
Policy Deliberation and Stability |
|
|
222 | (3) |
|
By-Products of Political Culture |
|
|
225 | (4) |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
|
227 | (2) |
|
Susceptibility to Penal Populism |
|
|
229 | (8) |
|
|
233 | (2) |
|
Zero-sum and variable-sum assumptions |
|
|
235 | (1) |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
|
237 | (4) |
|
10 Public Opinion versus Public Judgment |
|
|
241 | (30) |
|
Innovations in Public Opinion Assessment |
|
|
244 | (3) |
|
Effects of Mediated Proxies for Public Opinion |
|
|
247 | (11) |
|
`Evolving standards' and American capital punishment |
|
|
248 | (5) |
|
Public opinion and the James Bulger and Sarah Payne cases in Britain |
|
|
253 | (4) |
|
|
257 | (1) |
|
Coming to Public Judgment |
|
|
258 | (7) |
|
|
260 | (3) |
|
|
263 | (2) |
|
Auld, Halliday, and the Prospects of Public Education |
|
|
265 | (3) |
|
|
268 | (3) |
|
11 Effecting Penal Climate Change |
|
|
271 | (22) |
|
Penal Populism and Political Culture |
|
|
271 | (4) |
|
The Case against Re-Insulation |
|
|
275 | (3) |
|
`Communicative capacity' and state legitimacy |
|
|
275 | (2) |
|
No participation without public judgment |
|
|
277 | (1) |
|
|
278 | (3) |
|
|
281 | (3) |
|
|
284 | (2) |
|
Six Ways of Institutionalizing Deliberation |
|
|
286 | (5) |
|
|
291 | (2) |
References |
|
293 | (28) |
Index |
|
321 | |