Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

El. knyga: Who Am I to Judge?: Judicial Craft versus Constitutional Theory

  • Formatas: 192 pages
  • Išleidimo metai: 25-Feb-2025
  • Leidėjas: Yale University Press
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780300281613
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
Who Am I to Judge?: Judicial Craft versus Constitutional TheoryDidesnis paveikslėlis
  • Formatas: 192 pages
  • Išleidimo metai: 25-Feb-2025
  • Leidėjas: Yale University Press
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780300281613
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:

DRM apribojimai

  • Kopijuoti:

    neleidžiama

  • Spausdinti:

    neleidžiama

  • El. knygos naudojimas:

    Skaitmeninių teisių valdymas (DRM)
    Leidykla pateikė šią knygą šifruota forma, o tai reiškia, kad norint ją atrakinti ir perskaityti reikia įdiegti nemokamą programinę įrangą. Norint skaityti šią el. knygą, turite susikurti Adobe ID . Daugiau informacijos  čia. El. knygą galima atsisiųsti į 6 įrenginius (vienas vartotojas su tuo pačiu Adobe ID).

    Reikalinga programinė įranga
    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą mobiliajame įrenginyje (telefone ar planšetiniame kompiuteryje), turite įdiegti šią nemokamą programėlę: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą asmeniniame arba „Mac“ kompiuteryje, Jums reikalinga  Adobe Digital Editions “ (tai nemokama programa, specialiai sukurta el. knygoms. Tai nėra tas pats, kas „Adobe Reader“, kurią tikriausiai jau turite savo kompiuteryje.)

    Negalite skaityti šios el. knygos naudodami „Amazon Kindle“.

A leading legal scholar asks a fundamental question: Do we need a theory of constitutional interpretation?
 
Do we need a theory of constitutional interpretation? It is a common argument among originalists that however objectionable you may find their theory, at least they have one, whereas their opponents do not have any theory at all. But as Mark Tushnet argues, for most of the Supreme Court’s history, including some of its most exceptional periods, the Court operated without a theory. In this book, Tushnet shows us what a constitutional theory actually is; what judges need from it and why they probably can’t get what they need; and the great harm that results when judges allow theory to dictate bad policy. It is not theory that matters, Tushnet argues. The vitally important, indispensable quality in a judge is good judgment.

A leading legal scholar asks a fundamental question: Do we need a theory of constitutional interpretation?

Recenzijos

Professor Tushnet has skillfully and straightforwardly called out the myth of originalism and the rabbit hole of judicial philosophies. For lawyer and non-lawyer alike, this book helps set the course to restore the legitimacy of our judiciary.Russ Feingold, president, American Constitution Society

Mark Tushnet, one of the nations most distinguished constitutional scholars, thinks constitutional theory is overrated. Debating who has the best theory, he explains, is far less important than paying attention to how judges actually judge. Despite its title, this book is a love letter to judgmentreasoned judgment expressed through sound judicial craft.Jack Balkin, Yale Law School

Mark Tushnet is William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law emeritus at Harvard Law School. He is the author of more than a dozen books, has edited eight others, and has written numerous articles on constitutional law and legal history.
Daugiau apie elektronines knygas Daugiau apie elektronines knygas
Pastovi nuoroda: https://www.kriso.lt/db/97803002816136e.html