|
1 What Is Foreign Policy Analysis? |
|
|
1 | (16) |
|
|
2 | (2) |
|
When a Policy Becomes Foreign |
|
|
4 | (3) |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
Levels of Analysis and the Evolution in FPA |
|
|
8 | (3) |
|
A Toolbox for Studying FPA |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
|
12 | (5) |
|
2 How to Identify and Assess a Foreign Policy? |
|
|
17 | (52) |
|
The Goals of Foreign Policy |
|
|
19 | (8) |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
|
21 | (2) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
Deducing the Goals Pursued |
|
|
24 | (3) |
|
|
27 | (5) |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
Mobilization and Exploitation |
|
|
30 | (2) |
|
Instruments of Foreign Policy |
|
|
32 | (9) |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
|
35 | (2) |
|
|
37 | (2) |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
The Process of Foreign Policy |
|
|
41 | (5) |
|
Segmentation in Six Phases |
|
|
41 | (3) |
|
A Linear, Cyclical or Chaotic Process |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
The Outcome of Foreign Policy |
|
|
46 | (6) |
|
|
46 | (2) |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
Historical Institutionalism |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
|
50 | (2) |
|
From the Puzzle to the Theoretical Explanations |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (16) |
|
3 Do Decision-Makers Matter? |
|
|
69 | (32) |
|
|
71 | (6) |
|
From Psychobiography to Statistics |
|
|
72 | (2) |
|
Middle Way: Affective Dimensions |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
Typologies Combining the Affective Dimensions |
|
|
75 | (2) |
|
|
77 | (9) |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
|
82 | (2) |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
|
86 | (5) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
|
88 | (2) |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
|
91 | (10) |
|
4 What Is the Influence of the Bureaucracy? |
|
|
101 | (26) |
|
|
102 | (4) |
|
Defining Management Styles |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
The Most Appropriate Management Style |
|
|
104 | (2) |
|
|
106 | (4) |
|
|
107 | (2) |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
|
110 | (4) |
|
Organizational Strategies |
|
|
110 | (2) |
|
|
112 | (2) |
|
|
114 | (6) |
|
One Game, Several Players |
|
|
114 | (2) |
|
Interactions Between the Players |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
Position of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
Bureaucratic Model and Its Critics |
|
|
118 | (2) |
|
|
120 | (7) |
|
5 To What Extent Is Foreign Policy Shaped by Institutions? |
|
|
127 | (40) |
|
Parliamentary and Electoral System |
|
|
128 | (6) |
|
Presidential and Parliamentary Regimes |
|
|
128 | (3) |
|
Parliamentarians and Their Preferences |
|
|
131 | (2) |
|
Political Cohabitation and Coalitions |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
Strong State and Weak State |
|
|
134 | (5) |
|
Determining the Relative Power of the State |
|
|
134 | (3) |
|
Power of the State and Its Foreign Policy |
|
|
137 | (2) |
|
Democratic Peace Proposition |
|
|
139 | (7) |
|
Observing the Democratic Peace |
|
|
139 | (2) |
|
Defining the Variables of the Democratic Peace |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
Peaceful Nature of Democracies |
|
|
142 | (2) |
|
Explaining the Democratic Peace Through Norms |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
Exchange of Information and Credibility |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
|
146 | (5) |
|
From Democracy to Free Trade |
|
|
147 | (2) |
|
From Free Trade to Peace and Vice Versa |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
Critics of the Liberal Peace |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
|
151 | (16) |
|
6 How Influential Are the Social Actors? |
|
|
167 | (50) |
|
|
167 | (9) |
|
The Almond--Lippmann Consensus and Its Critics |
|
|
168 | (3) |
|
Structure of Public Opinion |
|
|
171 | (2) |
|
Influence of Public Opinion |
|
|
173 | (2) |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
Influence of Leaders on Public Opinion |
|
|
176 | (6) |
|
|
177 | (2) |
|
Temptation of War as a Rallying Lever |
|
|
179 | (3) |
|
|
182 | (6) |
|
|
182 | (2) |
|
How Leaders Influence the Media? |
|
|
184 | (3) |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
|
188 | (7) |
|
How Interest Groups Influence Foreign Policy? |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
|
190 | (2) |
|
Case Studies and Generalizations |
|
|
192 | (3) |
|
|
195 | (5) |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
|
198 | (2) |
|
|
200 | (17) |
|
7 How Does Rationality Apply to FPA and What Are Its Limitations? |
|
|
217 | (38) |
|
|
217 | (9) |
|
From Micro-Economics to Foreign Policy |
|
|
218 | (2) |
|
Substitutability of Foreign Policies |
|
|
220 | (2) |
|
|
222 | (4) |
|
|
226 | (11) |
|
|
226 | (6) |
|
|
232 | (2) |
|
|
234 | (3) |
|
Rationality and Cognition |
|
|
237 | (8) |
|
|
237 | (5) |
|
|
242 | (3) |
|
|
245 | (10) |
|
8 What Part Does Culture Play in FPA? |
|
|
255 | (60) |
|
|
256 | (5) |
|
|
256 | (4) |
|
|
260 | (1) |
|
|
261 | (10) |
|
|
262 | (3) |
|
|
265 | (2) |
|
Foreign Policy as Identity Affirmation |
|
|
267 | (2) |
|
|
269 | (2) |
|
|
271 | (4) |
|
|
271 | (3) |
|
Roles as Foreign Policy Guides |
|
|
274 | (1) |
|
|
275 | (6) |
|
Women, Femininity and Feminism |
|
|
275 | (2) |
|
Nation and State in the Feminist Grammar |
|
|
277 | (1) |
|
Foreign States and Nations |
|
|
278 | (3) |
|
Organizational and Strategic Cultures |
|
|
281 | (8) |
|
Stability of Organizational Cultures |
|
|
281 | (3) |
|
Interactions between Organizational Cultures |
|
|
284 | (2) |
|
|
286 | (1) |
|
Strategic Cultures and Practices |
|
|
287 | (2) |
|
|
289 | (6) |
|
Discourse as a Field of Interaction |
|
|
289 | (3) |
|
Methods of Discourse Analysis |
|
|
292 | (3) |
|
|
295 | (20) |
|
9 Does the International Structure Explain Foreign Policy? |
|
|
315 | (26) |
|
|
317 | (6) |
|
Structural Shift in International Relations |
|
|
317 | (4) |
|
|
321 | (2) |
|
Can Structural Theories Inform Foreign Policy? |
|
|
323 | (4) |
|
Structural Assumptions and State Units |
|
|
324 | (3) |
|
Reconciling Agent and Structure |
|
|
327 | (6) |
|
|
328 | (2) |
|
|
330 | (3) |
|
|
333 | (8) |
|
10 What Are the Current Challenges to FPA? |
|
|
341 | (10) |
|
Challenge 1 Beyond Eclecticism |
|
|
342 | (2) |
|
Challenge 2 Beyond the American Framework |
|
|
344 | (1) |
|
Challenge 3 Beyond the State-Centric Prism |
|
|
345 | (2) |
|
Challenge 4 Beyond the Ivory Tower |
|
|
347 | (1) |
|
|
348 | (3) |
Bibliography |
|
351 | (2) |
Index |
|
353 | |