Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

El. knyga: Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes [Taylor & Francis e-book]

(University of Amsterdam and Wageningen University, the Netherlands), (University of Utah, USA)
  • Formatas: 200 pages, 2 Tables, black and white; 2 Line drawings, black and white; 1 Halftones, black and white
  • Serija: Routledge Series on Interpretive Methods
  • Išleidimo metai: 13-Dec-2011
  • Leidėjas: Routledge
  • ISBN-13: 9780203854907
  • Taylor & Francis e-book
  • Kaina: 180,03 €*
  • * this price gives unlimited concurrent access for unlimited time
  • Standartinė kaina: 257,19 €
  • Sutaupote 30%
  • Formatas: 200 pages, 2 Tables, black and white; 2 Line drawings, black and white; 1 Halftones, black and white
  • Serija: Routledge Series on Interpretive Methods
  • Išleidimo metai: 13-Dec-2011
  • Leidėjas: Routledge
  • ISBN-13: 9780203854907
Research design is fundamental to all scientific endeavors, at all levels and in all institutional settings. In many social science disciplines, however, scholars working in an interpretive-qualitative tradition get little guidance on this aspect of research from the positivist-centered training they receive. This book is an authoritative examination of the concepts and processes underlying the design of an interpretive research project. Such an approach to design starts with the recognition that researchers are inevitably embedded in the intersubjective social processes of the worlds they study.

In focusing on researchers theoretical, ontological, epistemological, and methods choices in designing research projects, Schwartz-Shea and Yanow set the stage for other volumes in the Routledge Series on Interpretive Methods. They also engage some very practical issues, such as ethics reviews and the structure of research proposals. This concise guide explores where research questions come from, criteria for evaluating research designs, how interpretive researchers engage with "world-making," context, systematicity and flexibility, reflexivity and positionality, and such contemporary issues as data archiving and the researchers body in the field.
List of Illustrations
xii
Acknowledgments xiii
Introduction 1(14)
A Sketch of the Book
9(6)
1 Wherefore Research Designs?
15(9)
Research Design: Why Is It Necessary?
18(1)
An Outline of a Research Proposal, Including the Research Design
19(5)
2 Ways of Knowing: Research Questions and Logics of Inquiry
24(21)
Where Do Research Questions Come From? The Role of Prior Knowledge
25(1)
Where Do Research Questions Come From? Abductive Ways of Knowing
26(8)
Where Do Research Questions Come From? The Role of Theory and the "Literature Review"
34(4)
Do Concepts "Emerge from the Field"? More on Theory and Theorizing
38(2)
Where Do Research Questions Come From? Ontological and Epistemological Presuppositions in Interpretive Research
40(4)
A Short Bibliography of Key Sources in Interpretive Social Science
44(1)
3 Starting from Meaning: Contextuality and Its Implications
45(9)
Contrasting Orientations toward Knowledge
46(3)
Contextuality and the Character of Concepts and Causality
49(4)
Concepts: Bottom-up In Situ Development
49(2)
But What of Hypothesizing? Constitutive Causality
51(2)
The Centrality of Context
53(1)
4 The Rhythms of Interpretive Research I: Getting Going
54(24)
Access: Choices of Settings, Actors, Events, Archives, and Materials
57(3)
Power and Research Relationships
60(3)
Researcher Roles: Six Degrees of Participation
63(3)
Access, Researcher Roles, and Positionality
66(2)
Access and Archives
68(1)
Access versus Case Selection
69(2)
Design Flexibility: Control and Requisite Researcher Skills
71(7)
Control and Positivist Research Design
71(1)
The Logics of Control and Interpretive Research
72(2)
Interpretive Researcher Competence and Skill
74(4)
5 The Rhythms of Interpretive Research II: Understanding and Generating Evidence
78(13)
The Character of Evidence: (Co-)Generated Data and "Truth"
79(4)
Forms of Evidence: Word-Data and Beyond
83(1)
Mapping for Exposure and Intertextuality
84(5)
Fieldnote Practices
89(2)
6 Designing for Trustworthiness: Knowledge Claims and Evaluations of Interpretive Research
91(24)
Understanding the Limitations of Positivist Standards for Interpretive Research: Validity, Reliability, and Replicability
92(3)
The Problems of "Bias" and "Researcher Presence": "Objectivity" and Contrasting Methodological Responses
95(4)
Researcher Sense-Making in an Abductive Logic of Inquiry: Reflexivity and Other Checks for Designing Trustworthy Research
99(10)
Checking Researcher Sense-Making through Reflexivity
100(4)
Checking Researcher Sense-Making during Data Generation and Analysis
104(2)
Checking Researcher Sense-Making through "Member-Checking"
106(1)
Doubt, Trustworthiness, and Explanatory Coherence
107(2)
"Researcher Contamination" and "Bias" Revisited
109(3)
Summing Up
112(3)
7 Design in Context: From the Human Side of Research to Writing Research Manuscripts
115(15)
The Body in the Field: Emotions, Sexuality, Wheelchairedness, and Other Human Realities
115(5)
Interpretive Research and Human Subjects Protections Review
120(4)
Data Archiving and Replicability
124(2)
Writing Research Designs and Manuscripts
126(4)
8 Speaking across Epistemic Communities
130(10)
Designing for "Mixed Methods" Research
130(5)
Crossing the Boundaries of Epistemic Communities: Proposal Review and Epistemic Communities' Tacit Knowledge
135(3)
Practicing Interpretive Research: Concluding Thoughts
138(2)
Notes 140(17)
References 157(22)
Index 179
Peregrine Schwartz-Shea is Professor of Political Science at the University of Utah.

Dvora Yanow is Guest Professor in the Communication, Philosophy, and Technology sub-department, Faculty of Social Sciences, at Wageningen University, The Netherlands. Together, they are co-editors of Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn. They also created the "Methods Café" at both the American Political Science Association and Western Political Science Association annual meetings and ran them for 12 years. Currently, they are researching Institutional Review Board (and other ethics review committee) policies and especially their relationships with field research.