|
|
x | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xi | |
Epigraphs |
|
xii | |
Introduction |
|
1 | (10) |
|
PART I Integrating Phenomenology with Cognitive Science |
|
|
11 | (126) |
|
1 The Concept of Phenomenology |
|
|
13 | (29) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
1.2 What Is Phenomenology |
|
|
14 | (9) |
|
1.2.1 Reduction and Variation as Phenomenological Methods |
|
|
14 | (4) |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
1.2.3 Static and Genetic Approaches |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
1.2.4 Phenomenological Psychology |
|
|
20 | (3) |
|
1.3 What Phenomenology Is Not |
|
|
23 | (8) |
|
1.3.1 Phenomenology Is Not Introspection |
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
1.3.2 Phenomenology Is Not About Qualia |
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
1.3.3 Phenomenology Is Not Anti-Naturalistic |
|
|
28 | (3) |
|
1.4 Why We Need Phenomenology in Explaining Consciousness |
|
|
31 | (5) |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
|
37 | (5) |
|
2 Naturalizing Phenomenology Reconsidered |
|
|
42 | (30) |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
2.2 Three Views on the Naturalization of Phenomenology |
|
|
44 | (5) |
|
|
49 | (3) |
|
2.4 A Question of Constraints |
|
|
52 | (14) |
|
2.4.1 Conceptual Constraints |
|
|
52 | (5) |
|
|
57 | (3) |
|
2.4.3 Neurophenomenology and Generative Passages |
|
|
60 | (3) |
|
2.4.4 Neurophenomenology and Homeomorphism |
|
|
63 | (3) |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (5) |
|
3 Models of Explanation in Cognitive Science |
|
|
72 | (65) |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
3.2 Scientific Explanation---Background |
|
|
73 | (2) |
|
3.3 Models of Explanation in Cognitive Science |
|
|
75 | (35) |
|
3.3.1 Deductive-Nomological Model of Explanation |
|
|
75 | (3) |
|
3.3.2 Personal Explanations |
|
|
78 | (5) |
|
3.3.3 Functional Explanations |
|
|
83 | (4) |
|
3.3.4 Dynamical Explanations |
|
|
87 | (7) |
|
3.3.5 Mechanistic Explanations |
|
|
94 | (16) |
|
3.4 Explanatory Integration of Cognitive Science |
|
|
110 | (8) |
|
3.4.1 Theoretical Reduction, Unification, and Integration |
|
|
111 | (3) |
|
3.4.2 Mechanistic Integration of Cognitive Science |
|
|
114 | (2) |
|
|
116 | (2) |
|
3.5 Is Phenomenology Explanatory? |
|
|
118 | (9) |
|
3.5.1 Types of Phenomenological Explanation |
|
|
119 | (5) |
|
3.5.2 Phenomenological Understanding |
|
|
124 | (3) |
|
3.6 Conclusion: Toward Integration of Phenomenology With Multilevel Mechanistic Explanation |
|
|
127 | (2) |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
|
129 | (8) |
|
PART II Phenomenology and Mechanism: In Search of Constraints |
|
|
137 | (64) |
|
4 Phenomenology and Functionalism |
|
|
139 | (28) |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
4.2 Husserlian Phenomenology and Computational Functionalism |
|
|
140 | (5) |
|
4.3 The Notion of Function and the Idea of Functional Phenomenology in Husserl |
|
|
145 | (3) |
|
4.4 Functional Analysis and Phenomenological Decomposition |
|
|
148 | (5) |
|
4.4.1 Phenomenological Decomposition |
|
|
150 | (3) |
|
4.5 Toward Functional-Mechanistic Naturalization |
|
|
153 | (9) |
|
4.5.1 Example 1: First-Person Perspective |
|
|
156 | (2) |
|
4.5.2 Example 2: Vision Studies |
|
|
158 | (4) |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
|
163 | (4) |
|
5 Phenomenology and Dynamical Modeling |
|
|
167 | (26) |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
5.2 Integrating the Dynamical and Mechanistic Frameworks |
|
|
167 | (4) |
|
5.3 Neurophenomenology and Dynamical Systems Theory |
|
|
171 | (3) |
|
5.4 Discovering the Dynamics of Experience---Epilepsy Study |
|
|
174 | (6) |
|
5.5 Micro-Phenomenology---Toward Diachronic Models of Experience |
|
|
180 | (4) |
|
5.6 Conclusion: Toward Phenomenologically Informed Dynamical Constraints |
|
|
184 | (4) |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
|
188 | (5) |
|
6 Conclusion: Toward Methodologically Guided Mutual Constraints |
|
|
193 | (8) |
|
6.1 Constraining Phenomenology |
|
|
195 | (4) |
|
|
199 | (2) |
Index |
|
201 | |